The Charter Of Fort Pierce School in Fort Pierce, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 2.

4300 OKEECHOBEE RD
Fort Pierce, FL 34947

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Data House School (3.2 miles):

89
Indian River Charter High School (15.0 miles):

61
Martin County High School (19.4 miles):

49
Dale Cassens Educational Center School (2.2 miles):

42
Northport K-8 School (7.2 miles):

34
Spectrum Junior/Senior High School (18.1 miles):

23
Dan Mccarty Middle School (2.2 miles):

16
The Charter Of Fort Pierce School:

2
The Charter Of Fort Pierce School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
St. Lucie County:

39
Fort Pierce:

40
The Charter Of Fort Pierce School:

2

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (772) 323-7047 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 56
School number: 702
School type: Senior High
District Name: ST. LUCIE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 12
Principal: Diane Allerdyce
Regular charter school.
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 23
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 80
Senate District: 26
School Web Address: www.charterschooloffortpierce.org

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

31%
State average from 141 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

15%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 139 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

41%
State average from 133 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

46%
State average from 133 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
THE CHARTER SCHOOL OF FORT PIERCE:

48%
State average from 136 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

37%
State average from 133 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

63%
State average from 133 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

373
State average from 133 schools:

540
Percent Tested
THE CHARTER SCHOOL OF FORT PIERCE:

100%
State average from 134 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: F

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

80%
State average from 132 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

80%
State average from 139 schools:

52%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 79 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Results


2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1446
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

264
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1604
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1611
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

252
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1703
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

272
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

239
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 68%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1342
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

233
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 68%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1570
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

252
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1696
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1756
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

253
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 18
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 6
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 50%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Fort Pierce, FL
  5. The Charter Of Fort Pierce School in Fort Pierce, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.