City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
61.
Other nearby schools ratings:
The Palm Beach Academy For Learning School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida: | 45 |
Palm Beach County: | 45 |
Lake Worth: | 48 |
This School: | 61 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (561) 649-7505 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 50
School number: 3442
School type: Elementary
District Name: PALM BEACH
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (561) 732-3397
Principal: Louisa Legato
Regular charter school.
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 71% |
State average from 6 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 72% |
State average from 6 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 96% |
State average from 6 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 48% |
State average from 6 schools: | 45% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 67% |
State average from 6 schools: | 61% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 73% |
State average from 6 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 65% |
State average from 6 schools: | 60% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 68% |
State average from 6 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 560 |
State average from 6 schools: | 532 |
Percent TestedTHE PALM BEACH ACADEMY FOR LEARNING: | 100% |
State average from 6 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 61% |
State average from 6 schools: | 61% |
Minority RateHere: | 48% |
State average from 6 schools: | 58% |
Region: 4
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1418 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1419 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 477
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 64% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1337
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1310
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientTHE PALM BEACH ACADEMY FOR LEARNING: | 65% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1337
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1314
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 739 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 739 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 244
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientTHE PALM BEACH ACADEMY FOR LEARNING: | 74% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 714
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 700
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientTHE PALM BEACH ACADEMY FOR LEARNING: | 76% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 714
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 702
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 131 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 131 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientTHE PALM BEACH ACADEMY FOR LEARNING: | 47% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 124
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 122
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientTHE PALM BEACH ACADEMY FOR LEARNING: | 43% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 124
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 122
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 469 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 470 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 169
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 51% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 428
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 421
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 428
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 421
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 856 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 857 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 281
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 53% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 798
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 782
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 799
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 785
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 258 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 258 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 67
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 34% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 223
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 222
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 37% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 221
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 220
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 250 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 249 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 84
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 31% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 238
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 236
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 36% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 237
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 235
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 67% |
State average from 6 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 71% |
State average from 6 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 97% |
State average from 6 schools: | 91% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 44% |
State average from 6 schools: | 52% |
Making Reading Gains THE PALM BEACH ACADEMY FOR LEARNING: | 65% |
State average from 6 schools: | 65% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 67% |
State average from 6 schools: | 67% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 70% |
State average from 6 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 60% |
State average from 6 schools: | 64% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)THE PALM BEACH ACADEMY FOR LEARNING: | 541 |
State average from 6 schools: | 543 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 6 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 58% |
State average from 6 schools: | 57% |
Minority RateHere: | 47% |
State average from 6 schools: | 56% |
Region: 4
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 29% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 21% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 64% |
State average from 6 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 72% |
State average from 6 schools: | 78% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 98% |
State average from 6 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 41% |
State average from 6 schools: | 44% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 62% |
State average from 6 schools: | 69% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 76% |
State average from 6 schools: | 74% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 62% |
State average from 6 schools: | 67% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 71% |
State average from 6 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 546 |
State average from 6 schools: | 561 |
Percent TestedHere: | 99% |
State average from 6 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 53% |
State average from 6 schools: | 48% |
Minority RateHere: | 47% |
State average from 6 schools: | 40% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 561 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 561 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 170
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 82% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 545
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 526
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 83% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 544
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 526
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 358 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 358 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 109
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 351
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 338
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 85% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 351
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 339
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 95 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 95 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 68% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 86
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 74% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 102 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 102 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 52% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 98
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 91
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 61% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 91
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1680 |
State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 306 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 23% |
State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2THE PALM BEACH ACADEMY FOR LEARNING: | 16% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 29% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 25% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 61% |
State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1826 |
State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 320 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 13% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 19% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 36% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 22% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 68% |
State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1887 |
State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500THE PALM BEACH ACADEMY FOR LEARNING: | 310 |
State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 17% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 27% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 36% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 18% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 5THE PALM BEACH ACADEMY FOR LEARNING: | 2% |
State average: | 3% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 56% |
State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17THE PALM BEACH ACADEMY FOR LEARNING: | 16 |
State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 308 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 24% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 34% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 34% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 42% |
State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreTHE PALM BEACH ACADEMY FOR LEARNING: | 1687 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 313 |
State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 29% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 17% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 29% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 18% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveTHE PALM BEACH ACADEMY FOR LEARNING: | 54% |
State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1835 |
State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 317 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 18% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 17% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 33% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4THE PALM BEACH ACADEMY FOR LEARNING: | 24% |
State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 65% |
State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8THE PALM BEACH ACADEMY FOR LEARNING: | 6 |
State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1917 |
State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 326 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1THE PALM BEACH ACADEMY FOR LEARNING: | 10% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 21% |
State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 39% |
State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 22% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveTHE PALM BEACH ACADEMY FOR LEARNING: | 69% |
State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12THE PALM BEACH ACADEMY FOR LEARNING: | 6 |
State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1717 |
State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 312 |
State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1798 |
State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 315 |
State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1874 |
State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 307 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 304 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1694 |
State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500THE PALM BEACH ACADEMY FOR LEARNING: | 315 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1829 |
State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 316 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1904 |
State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 323 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 501
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 5 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 14%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 94%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1701 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 310 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1788 |
State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 313 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1863 |
State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 305 |
State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 296 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1708 |
State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 318 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1854 |
State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500THE PALM BEACH ACADEMY FOR LEARNING: | 322 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1921 |
State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 327 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 487 |
State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 675 |
State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 491 |
State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 687 |
State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)THE PALM BEACH ACADEMY FOR LEARNING: | 14 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of StudentsTHE PALM BEACH ACADEMY FOR LEARNING: | 493 |
State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 692 |
State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Median NPRTHE PALM BEACH ACADEMY FOR LEARNING: | 68 |
State average: | 63 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 488
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedTHE PALM BEACH ACADEMY FOR LEARNING: | 321 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 66%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 15%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 96%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Lake Worth, FL
- The Palm Beach Academy For Learning School in Lake Worth, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: