Tonopah Elementary School in Tonopah, Nevada (NV) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Nevada) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 33.

Address:

1220 Idaho Circle
Tonopah, NV 89049

Principal: Alvin Eiseman
Phone Number (Verify before using): (775) 482-6644
Fax Number (Verify before using): (775) 482-5717
Website: tonopah-ems.nye.k12.nv.us
Title I School: No
AYP School Designation: Adequate

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Tonopah Middle School (0.0 miles):	45
Tonopah Elementary School:	33
Silver Rim Elementary School (2.1 miles):	23

Tonopah Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Nevada:	43
Nye County:	33
Tonopah:	36
Tonopah Elementary School:	33

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Adequate Yearly Progress

English Language Arts

School English Language Arts AYP Designation: Adequate

Participation

All Students:	100.0%
White:	100.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:	100.0%

Percent Proficient

White:	72.5%
All Students:	69.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:	66.7%

Math

School Math AYP Designation: Adequate

Participation

All Students:	100.0%
White:	100.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:	100.0%

Percent Proficient

White:	58.6%
All Students:	55.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:	50.9%

Average Daily Attendance

School Average Daily Attendance AYP Designation: Adequate

Black:	96.0%
American Indian:	96.0%
Pacific Islander:	94.3%
All Students:	93.9%
Individual Education Plan Students:	93.5%
White:	92.9%
Hispanic:	92.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:	92.3%

Discuss this school with others on our active Nevada Forum

Nevada Writing Examination Grade 4

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Tonopah Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	15	-6.3%	1.9%	26.7%	13.8%	40.0%	44.7%	20.0%	34.4%	13.3%	7.1%
White	11	-3.2%	11.0%	18.2%	8.6%	45.5%	40.8%	18.2%	40.7%	18.2%	10.0%
Select school year: 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective	Students Results
All Students	16	-2.5%	12.1%	25.0%	16.2%	50.0%	44.1%	25.0%	32.9%	0.0%	6.7%
White	13	-4.4%	20.5%	23.1%	10.5%	53.8%	41.4%	23.1%	38.8%	0.0%	9.2%
Select school year: 2004/2005 2003/2004

Nevada Writing Examination Grade 5

Students Tested: 26

Here:	100.0%
State:	99.9%

Studets Results in 2010/2011

Developing

This School:	15.4%
Nevada:	7.3%

Approaches Standard

This School:	61.5%
State:	47.5%

Meets Standard

Here:	23.1%
Nevada:	40.7%

Tonopah Elementary School Results

Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective

All Students

This School:	-40.7%
State:	-18.6%

Male

This School:	-53.8%
State:	-26.3%

Female

Here:	-32.6%
State:	-10.3%

White

Here:	-43.0%
State:	-10.3%

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Tonopah Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	26	-40.7%	-18.6%	15.4%	7.3%	61.5%	47.5%	23.1%	40.7%	0.0%	4.5%
Male	10	-53.8%	-26.3%	10.0%	10.2%	80.0%	52.3%	10.0%	34.5%	0.0%	3.0%
Female	16	-32.6%	-10.3%	18.8%	4.2%	50.0%	42.3%	31.3%	47.3%	0.0%	6.2%
White	24	-43.0%	-10.3%	12.5%	5.2%	66.7%	41.3%	20.8%	47.0%	0.0%	6.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective	Students Results
All Students	29	-43.1%	-17.2%	17.2%	7.7%	62.1%	45.7%	20.7%	41.9%	0.0%	4.7%
Male	15	-63.8%	-25.2%	13.3%	10.6%	86.7%	50.8%	0.0%	35.6%	0.0%	2.9%
Female	14	-20.9%	-8.8%	21.4%	4.7%	35.7%	40.3%	42.9%	48.5%	0.0%	6.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	20	-38.8%	-27.2%	15.0%	10.8%	60.0%	52.6%	25.0%	34.3%	0.0%	2.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective	Students Results
All Students	28	-16.0%	-4.9%	3.6%	8.9%	60.7%	44.3%	32.1%	40.4%	3.6%	6.4%
Male	11	-15.3%	-13.2%	9.1%	12.5%	54.5%	49.0%	36.4%	34.4%	0.0%	4.1%
Female	17	-16.4%	3.8%	0.0%	5.2%	64.7%	39.3%	29.4%	46.7%	5.9%	8.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	15	-18.4%	-15.5%	6.7%	12.6%	60.0%	51.2%	33.3%	33.2%	0.0%	3.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective	Students Results
All Students	37	-35.5%	-7.5%	18.9%	9.8%	64.9%	46.0%	16.2%	38.8%	0.0%	5.3%
Male	21	-37.4%	-15.5%	28.6%	13.3%	57.1%	50.5%	14.3%	32.8%	0.0%	3.3%
Female	16	-33.0%	0.9%	6.3%	6.2%	75.0%	41.3%	18.8%	45.1%	0.0%	7.4%
Individual Education Plan Students	10	-51.7%	-38.3%	30.0%	38.2%	70.0%	48.4%	0.0%	12.6%	0.0%	0.8%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective	Students Results
All Students	31	5.6%	8.1%	9.7%	10.3%	45.2%	42.0%	45.2%	40.1%	0.0%	7.6%
Male	15	-12.9%	-0.1%	13.3%	13.9%	60.0%	46.6%	26.7%	34.5%	0.0%	5.0%
Female	16	22.9%	16.8%	6.3%	6.5%	31.3%	37.1%	62.5%	46.1%	0.0%	10.4%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective	Students Results
All Students	32	-8.3%	5.3%	18.8%	11.1%	50.0%	44.0%	31.3%	38.4%	0.0%	6.5%
Male	14	-3.9%	-2.4%	28.6%	14.8%	35.7%	48.0%	35.7%	33.1%	0.0%	4.1%
Female	18	-11.8%	13.2%	11.1%	7.3%	61.1%	40.0%	27.8%	43.9%	0.0%	8.9%
White	24	-6.3%	14.8%	12.5%	7.1%	54.2%	38.5%	33.3%	45.3%	0.0%	9.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006

Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 3

Students Tested: 24

Tonopah Elementary School:	100.0%
Nevada:	99.8%

Studets Results in 2010/2011

Developing

This School:	8.3%
State:	10.3%

Approaches Standard

Here:	29.2%
Nevada:	20.3%

Meets Standard

This School:	37.5%
State:	31.9%

Exceeds Standard

Here:	25.0%
Nevada:	37.5%

Tonopah Elementary School Results

Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective

All Students

Here:	-3.4%
Nevada:	3.5%

Male

This School:	-8.8%
Nevada:	3.8%

Female

Here:	4.1%
State:	3.2%

White

Here:	-5.9%
State:	13.5%

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Tonopah Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	24	-3.4%	3.5%	8.3%	10.3%	29.2%	20.3%	37.5%	31.9%	25.0%	37.5%
Male	14	-8.8%	3.8%	14.3%	11.1%	28.6%	19.2%	28.6%	30.7%	28.6%	39.0%
Female	10	4.1%	3.2%	0.0%	9.5%	30.0%	21.5%	50.0%	33.1%	20.0%	36.0%
White	20	-5.9%	13.5%	5.0%	6.0%	35.0%	14.6%	30.0%	31.5%	30.0%	47.8%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	37	-14.5%	0.4%	10.8%	11.5%	37.8%	22.2%	24.3%	34.9%	27.0%	31.4%
Male	21	-13.5%	0.7%	9.5%	11.6%	38.1%	21.7%	28.6%	33.9%	23.8%	32.8%
Female	16	-15.9%	0.1%	12.5%	11.3%	37.5%	22.7%	18.8%	35.9%	31.3%	30.0%
White	31	-7.8%	9.8%	12.9%	6.9%	29.0%	17.5%	25.8%	35.9%	32.3%	39.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	12	-32.6%	-8.4%	25.0%	15.5%	41.7%	26.9%	8.3%	34.5%	25.0%	23.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	24	-2.1%	4.2%	8.3%	6.5%	37.5%	33.0%	37.5%	31.3%	16.7%	29.2%
Male	10	3.7%	6.0%	0.0%	6.6%	40.0%	31.0%	40.0%	31.3%	20.0%	31.1%
Female	14	-6.3%	2.2%	14.3%	6.4%	35.7%	35.1%	35.7%	31.3%	14.3%	27.2%
White	21	-3.9%	14.7%	9.5%	3.7%	38.1%	25.3%	33.3%	33.2%	19.0%	37.8%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	33	4.3%	3.6%	6.1%	8.3%	33.3%	31.7%	36.4%	35.6%	24.2%	24.4%
Male	19	1.6%	4.0%	5.3%	8.6%	36.8%	31.1%	36.8%	34.8%	21.1%	25.4%
Female	14	8.0%	3.3%	7.1%	8.0%	28.6%	32.4%	35.7%	36.3%	28.6%	23.2%
White	26	5.2%	13.8%	7.7%	5.0%	30.8%	24.9%	34.6%	37.5%	26.9%	32.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	20	-11.3%	-6.7%	10.0%	12.0%	45.0%	38.4%	35.0%	33.6%	10.0%	16.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	31	21.2%	12.4%	6.5%	8.8%	29.0%	35.5%	35.5%	33.7%	29.0%	22.1%
Male	15	30.0%	13.0%	0.0%	9.6%	26.7%	34.2%	46.7%	32.6%	26.7%	23.7%
Female	16	13.0%	11.9%	12.5%	8.0%	31.3%	36.9%	25.0%	34.8%	31.3%	20.3%
White	28	24.6%	23.4%	3.6%	5.0%	28.6%	28.3%	39.3%	36.8%	28.6%	30.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	11	11.2%	2.2%	9.1%	12.3%	36.4%	42.2%	27.3%	31.2%	27.3%	14.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	39	-17.2%	5.1%	17.9%	10.8%	53.8%	38.7%	28.2%	32.2%	0.0%	18.3%
Male	21	-16.8%	5.6%	9.5%	11.5%	61.9%	37.6%	28.6%	32.0%	0.0%	18.9%
Female	18	-17.6%	4.7%	27.8%	10.1%	44.4%	39.8%	27.8%	32.4%	0.0%	17.7%
White	36	-17.6%	17.4%	16.7%	6.0%	55.6%	31.2%	27.8%	37.2%	0.0%	25.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	12	-28.7%	-7.6%	25.0%	15.7%	58.3%	46.5%	16.7%	27.2%	0.0%	10.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	16	-7.9%	5.6%	0.0%	11.8%	62.5%	37.3%	37.5%	28.4%	0.0%	22.6%
Male	10	4.6%	7.5%	0.0%	11.9%	50.0%	35.2%	50.0%	28.2%	0.0%	24.6%
White	16	-7.9%	17.6%	0.0%	6.9%	62.5%	30.1%	37.5%	31.6%	0.0%	31.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	12	7.2%	10.4%	8.3%	12.3%	50.0%	42.7%	16.7%	24.5%	25.0%	20.4%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 4

Students Tested: 34

This School:	100.0%
Nevada:	99.8%

Studets Results in 2010/2011

Developing

This School:	8.8%
Nevada:	7.2%

Approaches Standard

This School:	32.4%
Nevada:	23.3%

Meets Standard

Here:	52.9%
State:	55.4%

Exceeds Standard

This School:	5.9%
Nevada:	14.1%

Tonopah Elementary School Results

Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective

All Students

This School:	-7.1%
Nevada:	3.6%

Male

This School:	-10.9%
Nevada:	3.2%

Female

This School:	-1.6%
State:	4.0%

White

Here:	0.8%
State:	12.5%

Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students

This School:	-15.9%
Nevada:	-4.5%

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Tonopah Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	34	-7.1%	3.6%	8.8%	7.2%	32.4%	23.3%	52.9%	55.4%	5.9%	14.1%
Male	20	-10.9%	3.2%	15.0%	7.7%	30.0%	23.3%	50.0%	55.0%	5.0%	14.1%
Female	14	-1.6%	4.0%	0.0%	6.6%	35.7%	23.4%	57.1%	55.9%	7.1%	14.1%
White	27	0.8%	12.5%	11.1%	4.2%	22.2%	17.5%	59.3%	58.9%	7.4%	19.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	10	-15.9%	-4.5%	10.0%	9.9%	40.0%	28.7%	50.0%	52.8%	0.0%	8.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	28	-8.8%	0.5%	7.1%	8.0%	35.7%	25.6%	53.6%	57.5%	3.6%	8.9%
Male	11	-2.3%	-0.3%	9.1%	8.5%	27.3%	25.9%	63.6%	56.2%	0.0%	9.5%
Female	17	-13.0%	1.3%	5.9%	7.5%	41.2%	25.2%	47.1%	58.9%	5.9%	8.4%
White	25	-5.9%	9.8%	8.0%	5.0%	32.0%	19.3%	56.0%	62.9%	4.0%	12.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	12	-24.2%	-9.1%	8.3%	11.4%	50.0%	31.9%	41.7%	51.8%	0.0%	5.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	31	-7.9%	8.0%	9.7%	8.1%	41.9%	27.6%	29.0%	32.4%	19.4%	31.9%
Male	17	2.5%	7.6%	5.9%	8.4%	35.3%	27.7%	29.4%	32.1%	29.4%	31.8%
Female	14	-20.6%	8.3%	14.3%	7.8%	50.0%	27.6%	28.6%	32.7%	7.1%	32.0%
White	25	-8.3%	17.0%	12.0%	4.9%	40.0%	21.8%	24.0%	32.9%	24.0%	40.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	18	-23.0%	-1.7%	16.7%	11.4%	50.0%	34.0%	16.7%	31.7%	16.7%	22.9%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	33	16.4%	9.9%	3.0%	9.3%	24.2%	24.5%	36.4%	38.7%	36.4%	27.4%
Male	14	15.1%	9.5%	7.1%	10.2%	21.4%	24.0%	35.7%	38.1%	35.7%	27.7%
Female	19	17.4%	10.3%	0.0%	8.4%	26.3%	25.1%	36.8%	39.4%	36.8%	27.2%
White	31	14.7%	19.0%	3.2%	5.7%	25.8%	19.0%	35.5%	39.8%	35.5%	35.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	16	-0.1%	-0.1%	6.3%	13.3%	37.5%	30.5%	37.5%	37.5%	18.8%	18.8%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	43	14.8%	21.0%	11.6%	9.9%	30.2%	25.8%	30.2%	35.6%	27.9%	28.7%
Male	24	23.4%	20.3%	16.7%	10.8%	16.7%	25.6%	45.8%	34.6%	20.8%	29.0%
Female	19	4.1%	21.8%	5.3%	8.9%	47.4%	26.0%	10.5%	36.7%	36.8%	28.4%
White	41	12.8%	31.5%	12.2%	5.3%	31.7%	19.8%	31.7%	37.3%	24.4%	37.5%
Individual Education Plan Students	13	-12.5%	-8.5%	15.4%	29.9%	53.8%	35.3%	7.7%	23.3%	23.1%	11.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	13	-12.5%	10.4%	23.1%	14.5%	46.2%	31.8%	15.4%	34.8%	15.4%	18.9%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007

Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 5

Students Tested: 28

Tonopah Elementary School:	100.0%
Nevada:	99.9%

Studets Results in 2010/2011

Developing

Here:	3.6%
State:	16.4%

Approaches Standard

This School:	10.7%
State:	14.5%

Meets Standard

Here:	85.7%
State:	64.0%

Tonopah Elementary School Results

Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective

All Students

This School:	19.8%
State:	3.3%

Male

Here:	24.1%
Nevada:	1.9%

Female

Here:	17.4%
Nevada:	4.8%

White

Here:	18.1%
State:	11.0%

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Tonopah Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	28	19.8%	3.3%	3.6%	16.4%	10.7%	14.5%	85.7%	64.0%	0.0%	5.2%
Male	10	24.1%	1.9%	0.0%	17.3%	10.0%	14.9%	90.0%	62.4%	0.0%	5.4%
Female	18	17.4%	4.8%	5.6%	15.3%	11.1%	14.0%	83.3%	65.8%	0.0%	4.8%
White	25	18.1%	11.0%	4.0%	10.7%	12.0%	12.3%	84.0%	70.0%	0.0%	6.9%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	31	-31.4%	0.6%	24.1%	16.2%	41.4%	17.3%	34.5%	60.4%	0.0%	6.1%
Male	15	-23.0%	-0.6%	0.0%	17.3%	57.1%	17.4%	42.9%	59.0%	0.0%	6.3%
Female	16	-39.2%	1.8%	46.7%	15.0%	26.7%	17.2%	26.7%	61.8%	0.0%	5.9%
White	25	-26.8%	9.3%	26.1%	10.8%	34.8%	14.0%	39.1%	66.7%	0.0%	8.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	22	-40.9%	-8.5%	25.0%	21.7%	50.0%	20.9%	25.0%	54.0%	0.0%	3.4%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	27	14.1%	5.9%	0.0%	4.0%	29.6%	33.8%	55.6%	45.7%	14.8%	16.5%
Male	11	-1.8%	4.7%	0.0%	4.8%	45.5%	34.2%	36.4%	44.8%	18.2%	16.3%
Female	16	24.9%	7.1%	0.0%	3.3%	18.8%	33.3%	68.8%	46.6%	12.5%	16.8%
White	24	18.7%	16.0%	0.0%	2.1%	25.0%	25.5%	58.3%	50.4%	16.7%	21.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	13	5.2%	-4.5%	0.0%	5.8%	38.5%	42.5%	53.8%	41.2%	7.7%	10.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	40	1.2%	5.3%	7.5%	5.9%	35.0%	32.5%	45.0%	48.4%	12.5%	13.2%
Male	23	4.6%	4.4%	8.7%	6.6%	30.4%	32.6%	56.5%	47.6%	4.3%	13.1%
Female	17	-3.4%	6.2%	5.9%	5.1%	41.2%	32.5%	29.4%	49.3%	23.5%	13.2%
White	36	2.0%	15.5%	8.3%	3.5%	33.3%	24.7%	44.4%	54.1%	13.9%	17.7%
Individual Education Plan Students	13	-40.9%	-30.4%	23.1%	23.7%	61.5%	50.4%	0.0%	22.5%	15.4%	3.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	15	-23.0%	-5.1%	13.3%	8.5%	53.3%	40.3%	33.3%	43.5%	0.0%	7.7%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	31	24.4%	15.1%	9.7%	6.7%	22.6%	34.8%	64.5%	46.9%	3.2%	11.6%
Male	15	10.0%	14.1%	13.3%	7.9%	33.3%	34.8%	53.3%	45.9%	0.0%	11.5%
Female	16	38.0%	16.3%	6.3%	5.5%	12.5%	34.9%	75.0%	47.9%	6.3%	11.7%
White	31	24.4%	26.5%	9.7%	3.7%	22.6%	26.6%	64.5%	53.6%	3.2%	16.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	10	6.7%	3.3%	20.0%	9.8%	30.0%	43.6%	40.0%	40.4%	10.0%	6.2%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	34	-4.2%	9.3%	5.9%	8.2%	52.9%	37.2%	41.2%	41.5%	0.0%	13.2%
Male	15	-12.1%	7.9%	13.3%	9.2%	53.3%	37.6%	33.3%	40.9%	0.0%	12.4%
Female	19	2.0%	10.7%	0.0%	7.2%	52.6%	36.7%	47.4%	42.0%	0.0%	14.1%
White	26	4.6%	20.8%	3.8%	5.0%	46.2%	28.9%	50.0%	47.7%	0.0%	18.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	18	-17.6%	5.1%	0.0%	9.2%	72.2%	40.3%	27.8%	38.1%	0.0%	12.4%
Female	11	-18.1%	6.7%	0.0%	7.5%	72.7%	40.4%	27.3%	39.3%	0.0%	12.7%
White	13	-14.6%	17.5%	0.0%	5.5%	69.2%	31.7%	30.8%	44.7%	0.0%	18.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	20	0.5%	15.2%	10.0%	8.4%	55.0%	41.9%	20.0%	39.7%	15.0%	10.0%
Female	11	11.0%	17.3%	0.0%	6.8%	54.5%	41.4%	18.2%	41.9%	27.3%	9.9%
White	19	-2.9%	26.1%	10.5%	5.2%	57.9%	34.2%	15.8%	46.3%	15.8%	14.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 3

Students Tested: 24

Tonopah Elementary School:	100.0%
Nevada:	99.8%

Studets Results in 2010/2011

Developing

Here:	8.3%
State:	21.5%

Approaches Standard

This School:	29.2%
Nevada:	20.2%

Meets Standard

This School:	41.7%
State:	32.6%

Exceeds Standard

This School:	20.8%
State:	25.7%

Tonopah Elementary School Results

Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective

All Students

This School:	-1.3%
State:	-5.5%

Male

This School:	-6.7%
Nevada:	-8.6%

Female

Here:	6.2%
Nevada:	-2.3%

White

Here:	1.2%
Nevada:	7.9%

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Tonopah Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	24	-1.3%	-5.5%	8.3%	21.5%	29.2%	20.2%	41.7%	32.6%	20.8%	25.7%
Male	14	-6.7%	-8.6%	14.3%	24.2%	28.6%	20.6%	35.7%	31.8%	21.4%	23.4%
Female	10	6.2%	-2.3%	0.0%	18.7%	30.0%	19.8%	50.0%	33.5%	20.0%	28.0%
White	20	1.2%	7.9%	5.0%	12.6%	30.0%	15.7%	40.0%	35.2%	25.0%	36.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 4

Students Tested: 34

Here:	100.0%
State:	99.9%

Studets Results in 2010/2011

Developing

This School:	14.7%
State:	15.9%

Approaches Standard

Here:	29.4%
Nevada:	19.3%

Meets Standard

This School:	47.1%
State:	46.3%

Exceeds Standard

This School:	8.8%
State:	18.5%

Tonopah Elementary School Results

Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective

All Students

This School:	-10.0%
Nevada:	-1.1%

Male

Here:	-20.9%
Nevada:	-5.4%

Female

This School:	5.5%
State:	3.4%

White

Here:	-2.9%
Nevada:	10.9%

Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students

This School:	-5.9%
State:	-11.4%

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Tonopah Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	34	-10.0%	-1.1%	14.7%	15.9%	29.4%	19.3%	47.1%	46.3%	8.8%	18.5%
Male	20	-20.9%	-5.4%	25.0%	19.0%	30.0%	20.5%	35.0%	44.7%	10.0%	15.9%
Female	14	5.5%	3.4%	0.0%	12.7%	28.6%	18.0%	64.3%	48.0%	7.1%	21.3%
White	27	-2.9%	10.9%	14.8%	9.1%	22.2%	14.1%	51.9%	50.0%	11.1%	26.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	10	-5.9%	-11.4%	10.0%	21.7%	30.0%	23.8%	50.0%	43.1%	10.0%	11.4%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007

Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 5

Students Tested: 28

Here:	100.0%
Nevada:	99.9%

Studets Results in 2010/2011

Developing

Here:	10.7%
Nevada:	17.2%

Approaches Standard

This School:	17.9%
State:	20.1%

Meets Standard

This School:	42.9%
State:	38.9%

Exceeds Standard

Here:	28.6%
Nevada:	23.8%

Tonopah Elementary School Results

Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective

All Students

This School:	5.5%
State:	-3.2%

Male

Here:	4.1%
State:	-7.4%

Female

Here:	6.3%
Nevada:	1.2%

White

Here:	6.1%
State:	9.3%

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Tonopah Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	28	5.5%	-3.2%	10.7%	17.2%	17.9%	20.1%	42.9%	38.9%	28.6%	23.8%
Male	10	4.1%	-7.4%	10.0%	20.7%	20.0%	20.7%	70.0%	37.3%	0.0%	21.2%
Female	18	6.3%	1.2%	11.1%	13.5%	16.7%	19.4%	27.8%	40.5%	44.4%	26.6%
White	25	6.1%	9.3%	12.0%	10.1%	16.0%	14.7%	40.0%	41.1%	32.0%	34.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Language Grade 4

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Tonopah Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Results
		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	32	25.0%	23.0%	34.4%	25.4%	25.0%	25.9%	15.6%	25.7%
Male	13	30.8%	27.8%	23.1%	26.6%	30.8%	24.3%	15.4%	21.3%
Female	19	21.1%	18.0%	42.1%	24.2%	21.1%	27.5%	15.8%	30.3%
White	30	23.3%	14.6%	33.3%	21.5%	26.7%	27.9%	16.7%	36.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	11	27.3%	33.1%	45.5%	29.8%	18.2%	23.3%	9.1%	13.7%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Mathematics Grade 4

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Tonopah Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Results
		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	32	12.9%	20.6%	19.4%	24.2%	38.7%	27.9%	29.0%	27.3%
Male	13	7.7%	21.9%	23.1%	23.0%	38.5%	26.4%	30.8%	28.7%
Female	19	16.7%	19.2%	16.7%	25.4%	38.9%	29.6%	27.8%	25.8%
White	30	13.8%	13.1%	13.8%	20.4%	41.4%	29.1%	31.0%	37.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	11	20.0%	28.9%	30.0%	27.9%	40.0%	26.7%	10.0%	16.4%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Results
		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	46	44.4%	20.8%	2.2%	24.4%	33.3%	27.4%	20.0%	27.3%
Male	25	40.0%	21.6%	0.0%	23.6%	44.0%	26.1%	16.0%	28.7%
Female	21	50.0%	20.0%	5.0%	25.3%	20.0%	28.7%	25.0%	26.0%
White	43	47.6%	12.7%	2.4%	20.2%	31.0%	28.8%	19.0%	38.3%
Individual Education Plan Students	12	75.0%	46.5%	0.0%	24.6%	16.7%	16.6%	8.3%	12.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	13	76.9%	29.7%	0.0%	29.1%	15.4%	25.5%	7.7%	15.7%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Results
		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	29	7.1%	21.4%	32.1%	24.6%	46.4%	26.9%	14.3%	27.0%
Male	15	0.0%	22.6%	35.7%	23.5%	57.1%	25.5%	7.1%	28.5%
Female	14	14.3%	20.3%	28.6%	25.7%	35.7%	28.5%	21.4%	25.6%
White	28	7.1%	13.0%	32.1%	20.8%	46.4%	28.9%	14.3%	37.3%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Results
		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	15	6.7%	22.1%	33.3%	25.2%	46.7%	27.2%	13.3%	25.5%
White	11	9.1%	14.4%	18.2%	21.2%	54.5%	29.3%	18.2%	35.0%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Results
		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	16	25.0%	25.0%	43.8%	23.9%	25.0%	26.7%	6.3%	24.5%
White	14	28.6%	16.8%	42.9%	20.8%	21.4%	28.5%	7.1%	34.0%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Reading Grade 4

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Tonopah Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Results
		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	32	12.5%	23.7%	34.4%	27.6%	12.5%	25.3%	40.6%	23.5%
Male	13	15.4%	25.9%	30.8%	27.8%	15.4%	24.1%	38.5%	22.2%
Female	19	10.5%	21.4%	36.8%	27.3%	10.5%	26.5%	42.1%	24.8%
White	30	13.3%	11.6%	30.0%	21.5%	13.3%	29.4%	43.3%	37.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	11	9.1%	35.4%	54.5%	32.7%	9.1%	21.0%	27.3%	10.9%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Science Grade 4

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Tonopah Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Results
		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	32	6.3%	19.9%	31.3%	26.8%	40.6%	31.5%	21.9%	21.8%
Male	13	7.7%	21.4%	30.8%	26.2%	38.5%	29.8%	23.1%	22.6%
Female	19	5.3%	18.2%	31.6%	27.6%	42.1%	33.3%	21.1%	20.9%
White	30	6.7%	11.8%	33.3%	19.6%	36.7%	34.4%	23.3%	34.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	11	0.0%	28.0%	54.5%	33.0%	27.3%	28.2%	18.2%	10.8%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AL	AZ	CA	CO	CT	DE	FL
GA	HI	IA	ID	IL	IN	KS
LA	MA	MD	MI	MN	MO	NC
NE	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	TN	TX	UT
VA	WA	WI	WV

AL	CA	CO	DC	DE	FL	GA
IA	ID	IL	IN	KS	KY	LA
MD	ME	MI	MN	NC	NE	NH
NJ	NV	NY	OH	OK	OR	PA
SC	TN	TX	UT	VA	WA	WI