Tonopah Middle School in Tonopah, Nevada (NV) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Nevada) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 45.

Address:

1220 Idaho Circle
Tonopah, NV 89049

Principal: Alvin Eiseman
Phone Number (Verify before using): (775) 482-6644
Fax Number (Verify before using): (775) 482-5717
Website: tonopah-ems.nye.k12.nv.us
Title I School: No
AYP School Designation: In Need of Improvement (Year 1)

Special Programs:
Full-Day Kindergarten: No

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Tonopah Middle School:	45
Tonopah Elementary School (0.0 miles):	33
Silver Rim Elementary School (2.1 miles):	23

Tonopah Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Nevada:	43
Nye County:	33
Tonopah:	36
Tonopah Middle School:	45

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Adequate Yearly Progress

English Language Arts

School English Language Arts AYP Designation: Adequate

Participation

Individual Education Plan Students:	100.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:	100.0%
All Students:	98.8%
White:	98.7%

Percent Proficient

White:	63.4%
All Students:	59.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:	40.6%

Math

School Math AYP Designation: Adequate

Participation

Individual Education Plan Students:	100.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:	100.0%
All Students:	98.8%
White:	98.7%

Average Daily Attendance

School Average Daily Attendance AYP Designation: Adequate

Hispanic:	94.5%
Pacific Islander:	94.3%
Individual Education Plan Students:	93.8%
American Indian:	93.7%
All Students:	93.3%
White:	93.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:	91.3%
Limited English Proficiency Students:	83.0%

Discuss this school with others on our active Nevada Forum

Nevada Writing Examination Grade 8

Students Tested: 35

Here:	100.0%
Nevada:	99.4%

Studets Results in 2010/2011

Developing

Here:	2.9%
Nevada:	2.7%

Approaches Standard

This School:	42.9%
Nevada:	36.5%

Meets Standard

This School:	54.3%
State:	59.1%

Tonopah Middle School Results

Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective

All Students

This School:	-9.5%
Nevada:	-3.0%

Male

Here:	-16.7%
State:	-12.8%

Female

This School:	-2.7%
Nevada:	7.1%

White

Here:	-10.5%
Nevada:	7.3%

Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students

This School:	-13.8%
State:	-15.2%

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Tonopah Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	35	-9.5%	-3.0%	2.9%	2.7%	42.9%	36.5%	54.3%	59.1%	0.0%	1.7%
Male	17	-16.7%	-12.8%	5.9%	4.0%	47.1%	45.0%	47.1%	50.2%	0.0%	0.8%
Female	18	-2.7%	7.1%	0.0%	1.4%	38.9%	27.8%	61.1%	68.3%	0.0%	2.6%
White	30	-10.5%	7.3%	3.3%	1.6%	43.3%	27.3%	53.3%	68.6%	0.0%	2.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	10	-13.8%	-15.2%	10.0%	4.2%	40.0%	47.3%	50.0%	48.0%	0.0%	0.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective	Students Results
All Students	31	2.9%	-6.9%	6.7%	5.1%	26.7%	38.0%	66.7%	48.1%	0.0%	8.8%
Male	13	-25.3%	-15.7%	7.7%	7.5%	53.8%	44.4%	38.5%	42.3%	0.0%	5.8%
Female	18	24.4%	2.3%	5.9%	2.6%	5.9%	31.3%	88.2%	54.1%	0.0%	12.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	13	-33.0%	-18.2%	15.4%	7.5%	53.8%	46.9%	30.8%	41.3%	0.0%	4.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective	Students Results
All Students	43	4.8%	-1.3%	11.6%	5.7%	25.6%	37.7%	51.2%	47.3%	11.6%	9.4%
Male	20	-3.0%	-9.6%	20.0%	8.0%	25.0%	43.7%	50.0%	42.1%	5.0%	6.2%
Female	23	11.6%	7.1%	4.3%	3.3%	26.1%	31.6%	52.2%	52.6%	17.4%	12.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective	Students Results
All Students	33	2.6%	-2.1%	3.0%	6.2%	36.4%	37.8%	51.5%	46.1%	9.1%	9.8%
Male	13	-4.2%	-10.7%	7.7%	8.8%	38.5%	44.0%	46.2%	40.8%	7.7%	6.5%
Female	20	7.0%	7.3%	0.0%	3.5%	35.0%	31.2%	55.0%	52.0%	10.0%	13.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective	Students Results
All Students	42	43.7%	19.1%	0.0%	6.8%	16.7%	34.5%	73.8%	46.6%	9.5%	12.1%
Male	24	35.4%	11.1%	0.0%	9.2%	25.0%	40.1%	75.0%	42.2%	0.0%	8.6%
Female	18	54.8%	27.6%	0.0%	4.2%	5.6%	28.7%	72.2%	51.3%	22.2%	15.9%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective	Students Results
All Students	24	40.0%	15.7%	0.0%	5.7%	12.5%	31.1%	75.0%	47.9%	12.5%	15.3%
Male	17	40.7%	8.0%	0.0%	7.9%	11.8%	36.6%	76.5%	44.6%	11.8%	10.9%
White	22	38.9%	26.3%	0.0%	2.6%	13.6%	23.7%	72.7%	52.7%	13.6%	21.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	10	22.5%	2.1%	0.0%	9.6%	30.0%	40.9%	60.0%	42.0%	10.0%	7.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective	Students Results
All Students	38	31.4%	18.3%	0.0%	6.1%	21.1%	28.1%	65.8%	48.0%	13.2%	17.7%
Male	15	25.8%	10.3%	0.0%	7.9%	26.7%	34.3%	60.0%	45.3%	13.3%	12.5%
Female	23	35.1%	26.9%	0.0%	4.2%	17.4%	21.5%	69.6%	50.9%	13.0%	23.5%
White	33	31.3%	29.2%	0.0%	2.9%	21.2%	20.4%	63.6%	52.5%	15.2%	24.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective	Students Results
All Students	30	43.0%	27.7%	0.0%	9.8%	20.0%	25.5%	50.0%	45.9%	30.0%	18.9%
Male	15	36.3%	20.1%	0.0%	12.5%	26.7%	30.5%	46.7%	43.3%	26.7%	13.8%
Female	15	49.7%	36.0%	0.0%	7.0%	13.3%	20.1%	53.3%	48.7%	33.3%	24.3%
White	25	43.0%	37.6%	0.0%	6.6%	20.0%	18.8%	52.0%	49.5%	28.0%	25.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	10	23.0%	13.9%	0.0%	13.9%	40.0%	35.2%	50.0%	41.9%	10.0%	9.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 6

Students Tested: 30

Here:	93.3%
State:	99.8%

Studets Results in 2010/2011

Developing

Here:	10.7%
State:	10.0%

Approaches Standard

Here:	28.6%
State:	19.6%

Meets Standard

This School:	60.7%
State:	64.7%

Tonopah Middle School Results

Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective

All Students

Here:	-5.2%
Nevada:	4.5%

Male

Here:	-18.8%
Nevada:	3.1%

Female

This School:	15.9%
State:	5.9%

White

Here:	-0.7%
State:	14.3%

Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students

Here:	-19.7%
State:	-4.7%

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Tonopah Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	30	-5.2%	4.5%	10.7%	10.0%	28.6%	19.6%	60.7%	64.7%	0.0%	5.7%
Male	18	-18.8%	3.1%	11.8%	11.4%	41.2%	19.6%	47.1%	63.2%	0.0%	5.8%
Female	12	15.9%	5.9%	9.1%	8.6%	9.1%	19.6%	81.8%	66.2%	0.0%	5.6%
White	25	-0.7%	14.3%	8.7%	5.8%	26.1%	14.0%	65.2%	71.3%	0.0%	8.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	14	-19.7%	-4.7%	15.4%	14.2%	38.5%	24.6%	46.2%	58.6%	0.0%	2.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	25	-21.9%	-1.9%	16.0%	11.9%	40.0%	24.0%	40.0%	58.5%	4.0%	5.5%
Male	12	-32.6%	-3.0%	25.0%	13.4%	41.7%	23.7%	25.0%	57.1%	8.3%	5.8%
Female	13	-12.1%	-0.8%	7.7%	10.4%	38.5%	24.4%	53.8%	60.0%	0.0%	5.1%
White	22	-20.4%	10.0%	13.6%	7.0%	40.9%	17.1%	40.9%	67.5%	4.5%	8.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	13	-27.4%	-13.5%	15.4%	16.8%	46.2%	30.8%	30.8%	50.3%	7.7%	2.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	42	-2.3%	12.3%	14.3%	8.9%	33.3%	24.2%	31.0%	42.2%	21.4%	24.7%
Male	25	-2.7%	10.9%	16.0%	10.3%	32.0%	24.1%	32.0%	40.3%	20.0%	25.3%
Female	17	-1.7%	13.7%	11.8%	7.4%	35.3%	24.3%	29.4%	44.2%	23.5%	24.1%
White	38	-4.7%	23.0%	15.8%	5.0%	34.2%	17.3%	28.9%	43.0%	21.1%	34.6%
Individual Education Plan Students	14	-33.2%	-28.4%	35.7%	36.9%	42.9%	36.8%	14.3%	21.5%	7.1%	4.7%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	16	-4.7%	2.2%	12.5%	12.7%	37.5%	30.5%	31.3%	42.1%	18.8%	14.8%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	29	10.8%	7.6%	10.3%	12.5%	24.1%	25.2%	51.7%	39.5%	13.8%	22.8%
Male	11	9.0%	5.7%	0.0%	14.4%	36.4%	25.1%	54.5%	37.7%	9.1%	22.7%
Female	18	12.0%	9.6%	16.7%	10.4%	16.7%	25.3%	50.0%	41.4%	16.7%	22.9%
White	29	10.8%	19.4%	10.3%	7.1%	24.1%	18.9%	51.7%	42.0%	13.8%	32.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	35	22.4%	16.6%	11.4%	14.4%	22.9%	25.7%	57.1%	40.7%	8.6%	19.2%
Male	15	23.4%	14.8%	13.3%	16.7%	20.0%	25.2%	60.0%	38.5%	6.7%	19.6%
Female	20	21.7%	18.5%	10.0%	12.0%	25.0%	26.3%	55.0%	43.0%	10.0%	18.8%
White	29	32.6%	29.4%	6.9%	8.4%	17.2%	18.9%	65.5%	45.2%	10.3%	27.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007

Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 7

Students Tested: 22

Tonopah Middle School:	100.0%
Nevada:	99.6%

Studets Results in 2010/2011

Developing

This School:	13.6%
State:	11.4%

Approaches Standard

Here:	18.2%
State:	18.2%

Meets Standard

This School:	63.6%
State:	62.7%

Exceeds Standard

This School:	4.6%
Nevada:	7.7%

Tonopah Middle School Results

Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective

All Students

Here:	2.3%
State:	4.5%

Male

Here:	-5.9%
Nevada:	3.1%

Female

This School:	9.1%
State:	6.1%

White

This School:	9.1%
State:	15.0%

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Tonopah Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	22	2.3%	4.5%	13.6%	11.4%	18.2%	18.2%	63.6%	62.7%	4.6%	7.7%
Male	10	-5.9%	3.1%	10.0%	12.5%	30.0%	18.6%	60.0%	61.0%	0.0%	8.0%
Female	12	9.1%	6.1%	16.7%	10.2%	8.3%	17.8%	66.7%	64.5%	8.3%	7.5%
White	20	9.1%	15.0%	15.0%	6.3%	10.0%	12.9%	70.0%	69.2%	5.0%	11.7%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	37	-0.2%	-0.6%	11.4%	12.2%	22.9%	22.5%	62.9%	59.0%	2.9%	6.3%
Male	20	-2.7%	-0.9%	10.5%	13.1%	26.3%	22.0%	63.2%	58.3%	0.0%	6.7%
Female	17	2.9%	-0.2%	12.5%	11.3%	18.8%	23.0%	62.5%	59.8%	6.3%	5.9%
White	33	5.1%	11.3%	12.9%	6.7%	16.1%	16.1%	67.7%	67.8%	3.2%	9.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	15	-12.1%	-12.1%	23.1%	17.8%	23.1%	28.5%	46.2%	51.1%	7.7%	2.7%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	26	-4.7%	8.7%	15.4%	11.6%	34.6%	25.1%	38.5%	39.5%	11.5%	23.8%
Male	10	5.3%	6.4%	0.0%	13.6%	40.0%	25.3%	50.0%	37.7%	10.0%	23.4%
Female	16	-10.9%	11.0%	25.0%	9.5%	31.3%	24.9%	31.3%	41.5%	12.5%	24.2%
White	26	-4.7%	19.7%	15.4%	6.6%	34.6%	19.1%	38.5%	41.6%	11.5%	32.7%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	39	17.1%	4.5%	5.1%	14.3%	23.1%	26.5%	51.3%	38.2%	20.5%	20.9%
Male	17	4.2%	2.1%	0.0%	16.7%	41.2%	26.6%	47.1%	36.0%	11.8%	20.7%
Female	22	27.1%	6.9%	9.1%	11.9%	9.1%	26.5%	54.5%	40.5%	27.3%	21.1%
White	34	18.9%	16.3%	2.9%	8.7%	23.5%	20.3%	52.9%	41.7%	20.6%	29.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	10	5.3%	-8.5%	10.0%	20.3%	30.0%	33.5%	40.0%	34.9%	20.0%	11.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	36	6.7%	14.8%	11.1%	15.2%	38.9%	26.7%	41.7%	39.2%	8.3%	18.9%
Male	16	6.7%	12.1%	6.3%	18.1%	43.8%	26.5%	37.5%	36.1%	12.5%	19.3%
Female	20	6.7%	17.6%	15.0%	12.2%	35.0%	26.8%	45.0%	42.5%	5.0%	18.5%
White	33	8.2%	27.2%	9.1%	9.0%	39.4%	20.5%	42.4%	42.9%	9.1%	27.7%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007

Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 8

Students Tested: 36

Here:	97.2%
State:	99.6%

Studets Results in 2010/2011

Developing

This School:	11.4%
Nevada:	8.8%

Approaches Standard

Here:	37.1%
Nevada:	32.0%

Meets Standard

Here:	48.6%
Nevada:	55.0%

Exceeds Standard

Here:	2.9%
State:	4.2%

Tonopah Middle School Results

Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective

All Students

Here:	-14.5%
Nevada:	-6.7%

Male

This School:	-13.0%
State:	-8.8%

Female

This School:	-15.9%
State:	-4.6%

White

Here:	-12.6%
Nevada:	3.4%

Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students

This School:	-35.9%
Nevada:	-16.9%

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Tonopah Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	36	-14.5%	-6.7%	11.4%	8.8%	37.1%	32.0%	48.6%	55.0%	2.9%	4.2%
Male	18	-13.0%	-8.8%	11.8%	10.3%	35.3%	32.6%	52.9%	52.9%	0.0%	4.3%
Female	18	-15.9%	-4.6%	11.1%	7.2%	38.9%	31.4%	44.4%	57.2%	5.6%	4.2%
White	31	-12.6%	3.4%	13.3%	5.5%	33.3%	25.2%	50.0%	63.5%	3.3%	5.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	11	-35.9%	-16.9%	40.0%	12.1%	30.0%	39.0%	20.0%	47.0%	10.0%	2.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	30	-9.2%	-10.0%	3.3%	13.5%	40.0%	30.6%	53.3%	52.2%	3.3%	3.7%
Male	12	0.8%	-10.5%	0.0%	14.2%	33.3%	30.4%	66.7%	51.6%	0.0%	3.8%
Female	18	-15.9%	-9.5%	5.6%	12.8%	44.4%	30.8%	44.4%	52.8%	5.6%	3.6%
White	30	-9.2%	0.6%	3.3%	8.6%	40.0%	25.0%	53.3%	61.1%	3.3%	5.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	12	-15.9%	-22.1%	0.0%	19.4%	50.0%	36.8%	50.0%	42.3%	0.0%	1.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	44	9.0%	0.0%	6.8%	13.0%	29.5%	32.3%	52.3%	41.1%	11.4%	13.6%
Male	20	0.3%	0.1%	5.0%	14.0%	40.0%	31.2%	50.0%	40.3%	5.0%	14.5%
Female	24	16.2%	-0.1%	8.3%	12.1%	20.8%	33.4%	54.2%	41.8%	16.7%	12.7%
White	39	12.0%	12.4%	7.7%	7.1%	25.6%	25.9%	53.8%	47.6%	12.8%	19.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	33	-3.2%	-2.3%	12.1%	17.0%	36.4%	30.7%	48.5%	41.9%	3.0%	10.4%
Male	13	14.6%	-3.4%	0.0%	18.3%	30.8%	30.4%	61.5%	40.3%	7.7%	11.0%
Female	20	-14.7%	-1.2%	20.0%	15.5%	40.0%	31.1%	40.0%	43.6%	0.0%	9.8%
White	29	-2.9%	11.1%	10.3%	9.4%	37.9%	24.8%	48.3%	49.8%	3.4%	15.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	11	-18.3%	-15.8%	36.4%	24.2%	27.3%	36.9%	36.4%	34.9%	0.0%	4.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	40	16.7%	9.5%	10.0%	19.0%	30.0%	28.2%	50.0%	43.1%	10.0%	9.7%
Male	23	8.9%	8.9%	17.4%	20.6%	30.4%	27.2%	52.2%	41.8%	0.0%	10.4%
Female	17	27.3%	10.1%	0.0%	17.3%	29.4%	29.3%	47.1%	44.5%	23.5%	8.9%
White	34	21.4%	23.5%	2.9%	10.4%	32.4%	22.8%	52.9%	52.5%	11.8%	14.2%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	24	19.2%	7.2%	0.0%	16.4%	37.5%	33.2%	54.2%	39.8%	8.3%	10.7%
Male	17	21.4%	6.0%	0.0%	18.6%	35.3%	32.1%	52.9%	38.0%	11.8%	11.3%
White	22	20.3%	20.0%	0.0%	9.5%	36.4%	27.2%	54.5%	47.4%	9.1%	15.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	10	-3.3%	-8.4%	0.0%	24.3%	60.0%	40.8%	40.0%	30.9%	0.0%	4.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	37	13.5%	5.7%	8.1%	19.6%	35.1%	31.4%	54.1%	38.1%	2.7%	10.9%
Male	15	23.4%	5.1%	6.7%	22.1%	26.7%	29.5%	66.7%	36.7%	0.0%	11.7%
Female	22	6.7%	6.7%	9.1%	16.5%	40.9%	33.5%	45.5%	39.8%	4.5%	10.1%
White	34	15.5%	18.2%	2.9%	11.6%	38.2%	26.9%	55.9%	45.7%	2.9%	15.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	11	-6.9%	-9.6%	18.2%	28.9%	45.5%	37.4%	27.3%	29.4%	9.1%	4.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	30	34.7%	15.9%	16.7%	18.7%	16.7%	33.4%	53.3%	37.5%	13.3%	10.4%
Male	15	21.3%	15.0%	20.0%	21.4%	26.7%	31.5%	40.0%	35.7%	13.3%	11.3%
Female	15	48.0%	17.1%	13.3%	15.5%	6.7%	35.4%	66.7%	39.6%	13.3%	9.5%
White	26	37.2%	28.6%	11.5%	11.6%	19.2%	27.7%	53.8%	45.7%	15.4%	14.9%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 6

Students Tested: 30

This School:	93.3%
Nevada:	99.8%

Studets Results in 2010/2011

Developing

Here:	35.7%
State:	24.8%

Approaches Standard

This School:	17.9%
Nevada:	17.9%

Meets Standard

This School:	35.7%
State:	35.3%

Exceeds Standard

Here:	10.7%
State:	22.0%

Tonopah Middle School Results

Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective

All Students

This School:	-19.5%
Nevada:	-8.6%

Male

Here:	-30.6%
State:	-13.4%

Female

This School:	-2.3%
State:	-3.5%

White

Here:	-18.1%
Nevada:	3.9%

Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students

This School:	-35.1%
State:	-20.0%

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Tonopah Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	30	-19.5%	-8.6%	35.7%	24.8%	17.9%	17.9%	35.7%	35.3%	10.7%	22.0%
Male	18	-30.6%	-13.4%	47.1%	29.3%	17.7%	18.3%	23.5%	33.2%	11.8%	19.3%
Female	12	-2.3%	-3.5%	18.2%	20.1%	18.2%	17.5%	54.6%	37.6%	9.1%	24.9%
White	25	-18.1%	3.9%	34.8%	15.9%	17.4%	14.3%	34.8%	37.7%	13.0%	32.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	14	-35.1%	-20.0%	46.2%	33.1%	23.1%	21.0%	30.8%	32.8%	0.0%	13.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007

Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 7

Students Tested: 22

Tonopah Middle School:	100.0%
State:	99.6%

Studets Results in 2010/2011

Developing

This School:	22.7%
Nevada:	24.4%

Approaches Standard

Here:	18.2%
Nevada:	22.0%

Meets Standard

This School:	36.4%
Nevada:	35.3%

Exceeds Standard

This School:	22.7%
State:	18.4%

Tonopah Middle School Results

Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective

All Students

Here:	-6.8%
State:	-12.2%

Male

This School:	-25.9%
Nevada:	-19.0%

Female

Here:	9.1%
State:	-5.1%

White

Here:	-5.9%
State:	0.2%

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Tonopah Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	22	-6.8%	-12.2%	22.7%	24.4%	18.2%	22.0%	36.4%	35.3%	22.7%	18.4%
Male	10	-25.9%	-19.0%	30.0%	30.6%	30.0%	22.5%	30.0%	32.8%	10.0%	14.1%
Female	12	9.1%	-5.1%	16.7%	17.8%	8.3%	21.5%	41.7%	38.0%	33.3%	22.9%
White	20	-5.9%	0.2%	25.0%	16.0%	15.0%	17.9%	35.0%	39.5%	25.0%	26.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007

Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 8

Students Tested: 36

This School:	97.2%
Nevada:	99.5%

Studets Results in 2010/2011

Developing

Here:	22.9%
State:	27.6%

Approaches Standard

Here:	25.7%
State:	27.8%

Meets Standard

This School:	22.9%
Nevada:	26.6%

Exceeds Standard

This School:	28.6%
State:	18.0%

Tonopah Middle School Results

Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective

All Students

This School:	-14.5%
Nevada:	-21.3%

Male

Here:	-13.0%
Nevada:	-26.7%

Female

This School:	-15.9%
Nevada:	-15.6%

White

This School:	-12.6%
Nevada:	-9.3%

Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students

This School:	-25.9%
Nevada:	-32.6%

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Tonopah Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	36	-14.5%	-21.3%	22.9%	27.6%	25.7%	27.8%	22.9%	26.6%	28.6%	18.0%
Male	18	-13.0%	-26.7%	17.7%	33.0%	29.4%	27.8%	35.3%	24.4%	17.7%	14.8%
Female	18	-15.9%	-15.6%	27.8%	22.0%	22.2%	27.7%	11.1%	29.0%	38.9%	21.3%
White	31	-12.6%	-9.3%	26.7%	19.3%	20.0%	24.1%	20.0%	30.8%	33.3%	25.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	11	-25.9%	-32.6%	50.0%	36.1%	10.0%	30.6%	20.0%	22.8%	20.0%	10.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Language Grade 7

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Tonopah Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Results
		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	40	20.0%	33.9%	35.0%	26.4%	30.0%	22.4%	15.0%	17.3%
Male	18	27.8%	41.2%	44.4%	25.8%	22.2%	19.5%	5.6%	13.5%
Female	22	13.6%	26.5%	27.3%	26.9%	36.4%	25.4%	22.7%	21.1%
White	35	20.0%	22.4%	34.3%	25.8%	28.6%	27.5%	17.1%	24.3%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Mathematics Grade 7

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Tonopah Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Results
		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	40	20.0%	31.2%	27.5%	27.2%	35.0%	21.7%	17.5%	19.9%
Male	18	22.2%	33.7%	38.9%	25.9%	33.3%	20.3%	5.6%	20.2%
Female	22	18.2%	28.7%	18.2%	28.6%	36.4%	23.1%	27.3%	19.6%
White	35	17.1%	20.7%	28.6%	25.1%	37.1%	25.9%	17.1%	28.2%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Results
		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	38	26.3%	31.1%	28.9%	26.8%	28.9%	21.7%	15.8%	20.3%
Male	16	12.5%	33.8%	31.3%	25.6%	37.5%	19.9%	18.8%	20.8%
Female	22	36.4%	28.3%	27.3%	28.1%	22.7%	23.7%	13.6%	19.9%
White	34	26.5%	20.2%	29.4%	24.9%	29.4%	25.3%	14.7%	29.6%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Results
		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	44	24.4%	32.0%	26.8%	26.1%	29.3%	21.1%	19.5%	20.7%
Male	24	26.1%	35.1%	34.8%	24.6%	30.4%	19.2%	8.7%	21.1%
Female	20	22.2%	28.7%	16.7%	27.7%	27.8%	23.1%	33.3%	20.4%
White	37	14.3%	21.1%	28.6%	24.0%	34.3%	25.3%	22.9%	29.5%
Individual Education Plan Students	11	70.0%	75.4%	20.0%	16.9%	10.0%	5.2%	0.0%	2.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	14	30.8%	44.8%	15.4%	28.6%	46.2%	16.4%	7.7%	10.2%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Results
		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	26	4.0%	31.5%	48.0%	27.0%	28.0%	21.5%	20.0%	20.0%
Male	18	0.0%	34.6%	47.1%	25.2%	23.5%	20.3%	29.4%	19.9%
White	24	4.3%	21.1%	43.5%	25.5%	30.4%	25.4%	21.7%	28.1%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

	Students Tested	Students Results
		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	37	29.7%	34.3%	37.8%	25.4%	21.6%	21.3%	10.8%	19.0%
Male	15	33.3%	36.7%	26.7%	24.4%	26.7%	19.8%	13.3%	19.1%
Female	22	27.3%	31.6%	45.5%	26.6%	18.2%	22.8%	9.1%	19.0%
White	33	27.3%	24.8%	39.4%	23.9%	21.2%	25.0%	12.1%	26.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	12	41.7%	47.5%	25.0%	27.1%	16.7%	16.5%	16.7%	8.9%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Reading Grade 7

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Tonopah Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Results
		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	40	20.0%	33.9%	27.5%	27.7%	27.5%	21.6%	25.0%	16.9%
Male	18	27.8%	36.9%	33.3%	26.4%	22.2%	19.9%	16.7%	16.9%
Female	22	13.6%	30.8%	22.7%	29.0%	31.8%	23.3%	31.8%	16.9%
White	35	20.0%	19.5%	28.6%	26.4%	25.7%	27.4%	25.7%	26.7%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Science Grade 7

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Tonopah Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Results
		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	40	7.5%	29.2%	22.5%	28.5%	42.5%	22.2%	27.5%	20.1%
Male	18	5.6%	32.0%	27.8%	27.9%	38.9%	20.3%	27.8%	19.8%
Female	22	9.1%	26.3%	18.2%	29.1%	45.5%	24.2%	27.3%	20.4%
White	35	8.6%	17.2%	20.0%	24.9%	40.0%	26.9%	31.4%	31.0%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AL	AZ	CA	CO	CT	DE	FL
GA	HI	IA	ID	IL	IN	KS
LA	MA	MD	MI	MN	MO	NC
NE	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	TN	TX	UT
VA	WA	WI	WV

AL	CA	CO	DC	DE	FL	GA
IA	ID	IL	IN	KS	KY	LA
MD	ME	MI	MN	NC	NE	NH
NJ	NV	NY	OH	OK	OR	PA
SC	TN	TX	UT	VA	WA	WI