City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
36.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Touchdowns4life School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:| Florida: | 45 |
| Broward County: | 47 |
| Tamarac: | 43 |
| Touchdowns4life School: | 36 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (954) 726-8785 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 6
School number: 5335
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: BROWARD
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (954) 726-9590
Principal: Wayne Neunie
Regular charter school.
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 23
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 96
Senate District: 32
Percent Tested| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 100% |
Grade in 2010: I
Grade in 2009: B
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: C
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 614 schools: | 56% |
Minority Rate| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 80% |
| State average from 614 schools: | 49% |
Region: 5
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 85 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 85 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (92%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 28% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 92% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| Here: | 18% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 49% |
Making Reading Gains | Here: | 72% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading | Here: | 83% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)| Here: | 521 |
| State average from 613 schools: | 553 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: B
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: C
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 52% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 48% |
Region: 3
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 106 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 106 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 90
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 90
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 53% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 39% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 603 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 603 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 95% |
| State average from 603 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains | Here: | 62% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 65% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading | Here: | 60% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)| Here: | 523 |
| State average from 602 schools: | 543 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 604 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: C
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 605 schools: | 49% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 605 schools: | 48% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 112 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 112 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 91
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 91% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| Here: | 32% |
| State average from 538 schools: | 44% |
Making Reading Gains| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 61% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 57% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns| Here: | 522 |
| State average from 539 schools: | 523 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: C
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 34% |
| State average from 541 schools: | 49% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 542 schools: | 53% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 99 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 99 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 33% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 63% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 90% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 89% |
Making Reading Gains| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 61% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 72% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns| Here: | 371 |
| State average from 526 schools: | 425 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: C
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 40% |
| State average from 525 schools: | 50% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 52% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 78 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 78 (97%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 42% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (97%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1695 |
| State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 308 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 71% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1716 |
| State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 299 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 52% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 58% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1844 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 301 |
| State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 44% |
| State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 284 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 44% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 31% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1649 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 304 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 61% |
| State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1708 |
| State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 286 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 19% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 42% |
| State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1833 |
| State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 305 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 44% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 44% |
| State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 1652 |
| State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 301 |
| State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1805 |
| State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 316 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1883 |
| State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 309 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 295 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1612 |
| State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 296 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 1742 |
| State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 294 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1868 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 314 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 47
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 49%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 100%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1692 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 308 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1756 |
| State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 307 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1838 |
| State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 300 |
| State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 302 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1620 |
| State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 297 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1782 |
| State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 304 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1895 |
| State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 320 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 667 |
| State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Functional (max 18)| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 681 |
| State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Literary (max 18)| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 692 |
| State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Median NPR| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 68 |
| State average: | 63 |
Functional (max 18)| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 34
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 287 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 35%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 50%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 88%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1676 |
| State average from 878 schools: | 1661 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 305 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1675 |
| State average: | 1663 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1545 |
| State average: | 1592 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 130
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1793 |
| State average from 808 schools: | 1746 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 314 |
| State average: | 305 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 83%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1833 |
| State average: | 1743 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1672 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 162
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1866 |
| State average from 819 schools: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 306 |
| State average: | 294 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1855 |
| State average: | 1807 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1723 |
| State average: | 1738 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 132
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 300 |
| State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 1649 |
| State average from 873 schools: | 1641 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 304 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1650 |
| State average: | 1645 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1621 |
| State average: | 1620 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 29
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 1804 |
| State average from 804 schools: | 1777 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 310 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 83%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1822 |
| State average: | 1774 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 1665 |
| State average: | 1645 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 157
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1838 |
| State average from 815 schools: | 1851 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 306 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1844 |
| State average: | 1845 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1759 |
| State average: | 1755 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 85
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 38
Mean Scale Score| TOUCHDOWNS4LIFE: | 670 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR: 63
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 23
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 680 |
| State average from 796 schools: | 675 |
Median NPR: 66
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 37
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 699 |
| State average from 810 schools: | 685 |
Median NPR: 74
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 38
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 668 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 669 |
Median NPR: 64
Number Sense (max 10): 5
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 23
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 694 |
| State average from 796 schools: | 685 |
Median NPR: 76
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 38
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 700 |
| State average from 810 schools: | 698 |
Median NPR: 71
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 38
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 284 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 39%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 47%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 92%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 74%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Tamarac, FL
- Touchdowns4life School in Tamarac, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: