Transition Center School in Orlando, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 0.

6125 N ORANGE BLOSSOM TRAIL
Orlando, FL 32810

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Lake Eola Charter School (5.6 miles):

98
Lake Howell High School (9.7 miles):

68
Rosenwald Center School (6.1 miles):

60
South Creek Middle School (16.0 miles):

53
Legacy Charter School (8.1 miles):

40
Kissimmee Charter Academy School (19.8 miles):

25
Legacy High Charter School (8.1 miles):

12
Transition Center School:

0
Ae Yop School (4.2 miles):

0
Transition Center School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Orange County:

44
Orlando:

42
Transition Center School:

0

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (407) 992-0599 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 48
School number: 122
School type: Senior High
District Name: ORANGE
Grade range: GRADES 8 TO 12
Principal: Shirley Johnson-Delgado
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 3
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 38
Senate District: 19

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

74%
State average from 9 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

79%
State average from 9 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 9 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

38%
State average from 9 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

53%
State average from 9 schools:

57%
Making Math Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 9 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

42%
State average from 9 schools:

47%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

70%
State average from 9 schools:

60%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

524
State average from 9 schools:

507
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 9 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: B

Grade in 2009: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

80%
State average from 9 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

94%
State average from 9 schools:

56%
Region: 4

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 82 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 82 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 74

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 74
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 56 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 56 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
TRANSITION CENTER:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
TRANSITION CENTER:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

74%
State average from 9 schools:

65%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

76%
State average from 9 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

93%
State average from 9 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
TRANSITION CENTER:

52%
State average from 9 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 9 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
TRANSITION CENTER:

76%
State average from 9 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

77%
State average from 9 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
TRANSITION CENTER:

77%
State average from 9 schools:

65%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

598
State average from 9 schools:

539
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 9 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

81%
State average from 9 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

94%
State average from 9 schools:

55%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 81 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 81 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1533
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

338
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

5%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

43%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

33%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

14%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

90%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

19
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1557
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

41%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

22%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

69%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

19
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1582
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
TRANSITION CENTER:

21%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

41%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
TRANSITION CENTER:

14%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

59%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
TRANSITION CENTER:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
TRANSITION CENTER:

1763
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

12%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

26%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
TRANSITION CENTER:

12%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

74%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1867
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

27%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
TRANSITION CENTER:

16%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

70%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1481
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
TRANSITION CENTER:

231
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
TRANSITION CENTER:

64%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
TRANSITION CENTER:

14%
State average:

26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

14%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

7
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

21%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

41%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

38%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

8
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1653
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

376
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

5%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

14%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

48%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

29%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

90%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1642
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

343
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
TRANSITION CENTER:

3%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
TRANSITION CENTER:

38%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

38%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

88%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1637
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

17%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

21%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

28%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
TRANSITION CENTER:

52%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
TRANSITION CENTER:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
TRANSITION CENTER:

1751
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

22%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

24%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

14%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

59%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1871
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
TRANSITION CENTER:

14%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
TRANSITION CENTER:

29%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

74%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
TRANSITION CENTER:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1586
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

202
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

60%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

30%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

10%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

10%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
TRANSITION CENTER:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1396
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
TRANSITION CENTER:

1542
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1717
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1792
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
TRANSITION CENTER:

1499
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

343
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1569
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1773
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

355
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
TRANSITION CENTER:

1773
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1628
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

236
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 76%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 1
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 31
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 12
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 8
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 50%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Orlando, FL
  5. Transition Center School in Orlando, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.