City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
31.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Trapnell Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida: | 45 |
Hillsborough County: | 42 |
Plant City: | 38 |
Trapnell Elementary School: | 31 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (813) 757-9313 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 29
School number: 4481
School type: Elementary
District Name: HILLSBOROUGH
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (813) 757-9129
Principal: Rhonda Pulling
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status:
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 12
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 62
Senate District: 10
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 61% |
State average from 963 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 63% |
State average from 963 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 87% |
State average from 963 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 25% |
State average from 962 schools: | 53% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 53% |
State average from 963 schools: | 64% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 62% |
State average from 963 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 44% |
State average from 963 schools: | 58% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 61% |
State average from 963 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)TRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 456 |
State average from 963 schools: | 543 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 963 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: C
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 119999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 87% |
State average from 963 schools: | 58% |
Minority RateTRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 76% |
State average from 963 schools: | 47% |
Region: 4
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 232 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 232 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 66
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 208
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 207
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 58% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 206
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 205
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 72 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 72 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 69% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 70% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 135 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 135 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 49% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 112
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 111
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 110
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 193 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 193 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 53
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientTRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 51% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 170
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 169
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 168
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 167
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 105 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 105 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 46% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 86
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 32% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 36% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 71% |
State average from 959 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in MathTRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 61% |
State average from 959 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 97% |
State average from 959 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 29% |
State average from 959 schools: | 52% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 71% |
State average from 959 schools: | 67% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 67% |
State average from 959 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 63% |
State average from 959 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 70% |
State average from 959 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 529 |
State average from 959 schools: | 560 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 959 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 85% |
State average from 959 schools: | 54% |
Minority RateHere: | 72% |
State average from 959 schools: | 46% |
Region: 4
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 225 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 225 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 73
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 62% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 197
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 195
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 53% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 197
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 195
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 73% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 62
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 68% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 62
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 121 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 121 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 102
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 101
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 45% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 102
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 101
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 185 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 185 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 57% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 159
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 157
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 49% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 159
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 157
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 104 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 104 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 49% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 86
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 43% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 86
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 23% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 21% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 65% |
State average from 954 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 68% |
State average from 954 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 86% |
State average from 954 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 22% |
State average from 954 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 60% |
State average from 954 schools: | 65% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 65% |
State average from 954 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 70% |
State average from 954 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 55% |
State average from 954 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 491 |
State average from 954 schools: | 544 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 954 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 79% |
State average from 954 schools: | 51% |
Minority RateHere: | 71% |
State average from 954 schools: | 45% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 224 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 224 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 200
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 199
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 200
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 200
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 68% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 62
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 71% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 62
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 120 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 120 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 45% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 102
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 53% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 102
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 175 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 175 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 89% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 48% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 155
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 154
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 56% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 155
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 155
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 101 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 101 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 39% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 49% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 20% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 33% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 64% |
State average from 862 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 70% |
State average from 862 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 69% |
State average from 862 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 32% |
State average from 862 schools: | 43% |
Making Reading GainsTRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 60% |
State average from 862 schools: | 70% |
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math GainsHere: | 66% |
State average from 862 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 61% |
State average from 862 schools: | 66% |
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathTRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 53% |
State average from 862 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere: | 475 |
State average from 862 schools: | 539 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 862 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 81% |
State average from 865 schools: | 58% |
Minority RateTRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 66% |
State average from 865 schools: | 56% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 239 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 239 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 91% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 74
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 216
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 58% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 216
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 70% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 64% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 135 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 135 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientTRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 47% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 117
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 117
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 190 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 190 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 89% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientTRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 45% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 170
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 52% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 170
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 110 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 40% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 51% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 20% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 20% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 69% |
State average from 848 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 69% |
State average from 848 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingTRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 72% |
State average from 848 schools: | 79% |
Making Reading GainsTRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 61% |
State average from 848 schools: | 62% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 72% |
State average from 848 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 67% |
State average from 848 schools: | 61% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere: | 410 |
State average from 848 schools: | 413 |
Percent TestedHere: | 99% |
State average from 848 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 81% |
State average from 848 schools: | 58% |
Minority RateHere: | 67% |
State average from 848 schools: | 55% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 246 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 249 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 77% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 71
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 58% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 219
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 58% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 223
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 82 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 74% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 76
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 67% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 79
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 129 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 130 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 76% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 33
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 46% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 112
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 51% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 113
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 193 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 195 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 70% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 53
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 49% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 166
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 51% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 169
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 113 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 114 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 42% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 98
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 51% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 99
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 29% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 45
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 32% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 47
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 63% |
State average from 834 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 55% |
State average from 834 schools: | 67% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 83% |
State average from 834 schools: | 79% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 61% |
State average from 834 schools: | 66% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 63% |
State average from 834 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 54% |
State average from 834 schools: | 60% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere: | 379 |
State average from 834 schools: | 412 |
Percent TestedTRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 100% |
State average from 834 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 81% |
State average from 834 schools: | 60% |
Minority RateHere: | 62% |
State average from 832 schools: | 54% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1265 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 294 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 23% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2TRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 20% |
State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 31% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 23% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 57% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1459 |
State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 299 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 29% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 16% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 33% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 19% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 55% |
State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17TRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 18 |
State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1506 |
State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 284 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 24% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 24% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 31% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 19% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 51% |
State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 290 |
State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 29% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 48% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 20% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 23% |
State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13TRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 8 |
State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1371 |
State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500TRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 315 |
State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2TRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 22% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 28% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 31% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5TRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 5% |
State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 63% |
State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1424 |
State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 293 |
State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 23% |
State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 22% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3TRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 38% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 11% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5TRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 5% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 55% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1609 |
State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500TRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 320 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 21% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 27% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 24% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 27% |
State average: | 28% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 51% |
State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12TRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7TRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1203 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 284 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1549 |
State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 314 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1537 |
State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 290 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 289 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1269 |
State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 293 |
State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1505 |
State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 311 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1545 |
State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500TRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 307 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 80
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Unscore - Combined: 3
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 91%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreTRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1248 |
State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 292 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1429 |
State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 294 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1477 |
State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500TRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 279 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 276 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1339 |
State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 308 |
State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1398 |
State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 287 |
State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1626 |
State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 324 |
State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 618 |
State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 641 |
State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Informational (max 18)TRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 11 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsTRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 67 |
State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 653 |
State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Median NPRTRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 60 |
State average: | 71 |
Functional (max 18)TRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 12 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)TRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 9 |
State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)TRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 13 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 65
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 282 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 52%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 46%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1223 |
State average: | 1342 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 287 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1319 |
State average from 1875 schools: | 1542 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 275 |
State average: | 313 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1360 |
State average: | 1546 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1277 |
State average: | 1397 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 83
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1539 |
State average from 1873 schools: | 1629 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 290 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1545 |
State average: | 1632 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1482 |
State average: | 1532 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 63
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 286 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1309 |
State average: | 1413 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 302 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1439 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 1525 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 296 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1490 |
State average: | 1528 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1322 |
State average: | 1414 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 167
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1629 |
State average from 1872 schools: | 1647 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 325 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1626 |
State average: | 1649 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1512 |
State average: | 1519 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 114
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 79
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 615 |
State average from 1891 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR: 45
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 85
Mean Scale ScoreTRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 624 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 642 |
Median NPR: 45
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 73
Mean Scale ScoreTRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 657 |
State average from 1870 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR: 64
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 80
Mean Scale ScoreTRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 614 |
State average from 1891 schools: | 632 |
Median NPR: 54
Number Sense (max 14): 9
Operations (max 11): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 85
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 645 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 652 |
Median NPR: 70
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 72
Mean Scale ScoreTRAPNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 654 |
State average from 1870 schools: | 663 |
Median NPR: 67
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 84
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 266 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 36%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 61%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 37%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Plant City, FL
- Trapnell Elementary School in Plant City, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: