University/Timber Creek High Relief School in Orlando, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 23.

445 WEST AMELIA ST
Orlando, FL 32801

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Oviedo High School (13.2 miles):

83
Lake Brantley High School (9.3 miles):

67
Gateway School (3.4 miles):

55
Timber Creek High School (14.5 miles):

42
Ocoee High School (11.0 miles):

32
University/Timber Creek High Relief School:

23
Wekiva High School (8.2 miles):

15
Pace Center For Girls School (3.3 miles):

6
Ae Yop School (6.2 miles):

0
University/Timber Creek High Relief School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Orange County:

44
Orlando:

42
This School:

23

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (407) 317-3200 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 48
School number: 1801
School type: Senior High
District Name: ORANGE
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

55%
State average from 451 schools:

62%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

58%
State average from 451 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 452 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

29%
State average from 451 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

56%
State average from 452 schools:

58%
Making Math Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 449 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

60%
State average from 452 schools:

52%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

69%
State average from 452 schools:

67%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

484
State average from 452 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 450 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: Pending

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

67%
State average from 454 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

45%
State average from 454 schools:

47%
Region: 4

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 807 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 807 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 292
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 762
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 732

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 762
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 733
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 436 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 437 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 161
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 418
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 396

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 419
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 398
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 96 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 93
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 93
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 248 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 247 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 89
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 224
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 220

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 223
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 219
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 557 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 556 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 181
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 525
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 503

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 523
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 503
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 121 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 121 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 143 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 143 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 134
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 132

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 135
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 131
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

56%
State average from 443 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

62%
State average from 440 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 443 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

39%
State average from 443 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 441 schools:

59%
Making Math Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 442 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

62%
State average from 442 schools:

56%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

62%
State average from 441 schools:

66%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

501
State average from 441 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 448 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

64%
State average from 446 schools:

46%
Minority Rate
Here:

44%
State average from 451 schools:

45%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 862 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 861 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 344
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 803
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 768

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 802
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 767
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 456 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 454 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 192
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 434
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 417

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 432
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 416
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 127 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 127 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 118
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 109

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 117
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 256 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 257 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 95
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 230
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 224

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 232
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 226
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 583 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 584 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 222
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 537
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 513

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 538
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 514
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 115 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 114 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 104
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 103

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 104
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 103
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 175 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 171 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 68
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 166
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 157

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 162
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 153
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

55%
State average from 425 schools:

61%
Meeting High Standards in Math
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

62%
State average from 425 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 425 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

32%
State average from 425 schools:

45%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

57%
State average from 425 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 425 schools:

74%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

52%
State average from 425 schools:

55%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 425 schools:

71%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

484
State average from 425 schools:

526
Percent Tested
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

99%
State average from 425 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

62%
State average from 425 schools:

42%
Minority Rate
Here:

43%
State average from 425 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 894 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 891 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 316
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 838
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 813

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 836
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 809
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 510 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 506 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 198
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 491
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 475

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 489
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 472
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 109 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 109 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 99
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 97
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 254 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 254 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 80
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 228
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 222

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 228
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 222
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 577 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 576 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 190
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 532
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 515

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 532
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 513
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 111 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 109 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 98
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 97
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 96
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 180 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 178 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 161
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 158

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 161
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 156
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

973
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

216
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

58%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

32%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

25%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

4
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

1
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1653
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

24%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

57%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1727
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

23%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

52%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1837
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

49%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1947
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

19%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

32%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

49%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1902
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

52%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

37%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

24%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

32%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

38%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

34%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

4%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

28%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

8
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

280
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

54%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

17%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

1%
State average:

5%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

19%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1299
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

264
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

50%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

33%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1594
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

36%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

12%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

35%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

1689
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

41%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

35%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

4
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1857
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

40%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

57%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1910
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

17%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

3%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

59%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1970
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

76%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

28%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

63%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1054
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

259
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

986
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

218
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 03
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 08
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 06
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1614
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1719
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1879
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1890
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1866
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1159
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

269
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1195
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

240
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1569
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

286
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1680
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

279
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1870
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

1910
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1956
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 74%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 195
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 177
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 81%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

913
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

236
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1145
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

245
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1620
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1745
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1830
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1857
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1892
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

294
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

286
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1120
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

261
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1324
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1559
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1754
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1859
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1893
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

1945
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

14
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

576
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

15
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

8
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

8
State average:

97

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

5
State average:

101

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

165
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

665
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

57
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

193
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

677
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

64
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

12
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

149
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

686
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

63
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

13
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

179
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

683
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

51
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

151
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

695
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

54
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

14
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 165
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

294
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 51%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 87%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 171
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

294
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 54%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
UNIVERSITY/TIMBER CREEK HIGH SCHOOL RELIEF:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Orlando, FL
  5. University/Timber Creek High Relief School in Orlando, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.