City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 56.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Imagine Charter At Weston School (16.7 miles): | 98 |
| Spanish Lake Elementary School (13.7 miles): | 82 |
| Addison Mizner Elementary School (15.5 miles): | 64 |
| Walker Elementary (Magnet) School: | 56 |
| Colbert Elementary School (8.7 miles): | 52 |
| Whispering Pines Elementary School (19.1 miles): | 43 |
| Hollywood Hills Elementary School (7.1 miles): | 32 |
| Myrtle Grove Elementary School (14.5 miles): | 14 |
Walker Elementary (Magnet) School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Broward County: | 47 |
| Fort Lauderdale: | 46 |
| Walker Elementary (Magnet) School: | 56 |
1
olivia clark
Jul 23, 2012 @ 9:21 pm
what grade average did this school have in 2011-2012
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 6
School number: 321
School type: Elementary
District Name: BROWARD
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (754) 322-8840
Magnet School.
Principal: Eric Miller
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 23
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 93
Senate District: 29
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 733 schools: | 53% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 64% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 733 schools: | 67% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| WALKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (MAGNET): | 64% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 58% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| WALKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (MAGNET): | 78% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| WALKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (MAGNET): | 625 |
| State average from 734 schools: | 543 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 733 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 119999: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 6% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 57% |
Minority Rate
Region: 2| Here: | 4% |
| State average from 735 schools: | 46% |
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 975 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 975 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 327
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 905
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 905
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 843 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 843 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 286
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| WALKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (MAGNET): | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 786
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 786
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 115 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 115 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| WALKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (MAGNET): | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 108
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 735 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 51% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 67% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 735 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 735 schools: | 65% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| WALKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (MAGNET): | 71% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 617 |
| State average from 734 schools: | 557 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 1999: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 4% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 53% |
Minority Rate
Region: 2| Here: | 15% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 45% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (90%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 11% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 15% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (89%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (89%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (90%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 711 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 711 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 711 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 711 schools: | 47% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 711 schools: | 65% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 711 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 711 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 711 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 603 |
| State average from 711 schools: | 544 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 711 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 1999: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 4% |
| State average from 711 schools: | 50% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 14% |
| State average from 711 schools: | 44% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (78%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (78%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 9% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 21% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (77%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (78%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (79%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (82%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 23% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (78%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (78%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 9% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 21% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 652 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 652 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 652 schools: | 83% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| WALKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (MAGNET): | 10% |
| State average from 650 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 652 schools: | 72% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 652 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 652 schools: | 67% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| WALKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (MAGNET): | 65% |
| State average from 652 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
| Here: | 430 |
| State average from 652 schools: | 553 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES| WALKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (MAGNET): | 100% |
| State average from 652 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: D
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 655 schools: | 53% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 655 schools: | 55% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 361 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 361 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 356 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 356 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| WALKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (MAGNET): | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 315 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 315 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 643 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 643 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 643 schools: | 81% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 643 schools: | 63% |
Making Math Gains
| WALKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (MAGNET): | 59% |
| State average from 643 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 643 schools: | 61% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 379 |
| State average from 643 schools: | 420 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 643 schools: | 100% |
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: D
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 644 schools: | 54% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 644 schools: | 54% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 356 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 356 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 348 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 348 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| WALKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (MAGNET): | 55% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 298 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 298 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| WALKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (MAGNET): | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 24% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 17% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 631 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 631 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 631 schools: | 80% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 631 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 631 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 631 schools: | 60% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 372 |
| State average from 631 schools: | 417 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%| WALKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (MAGNET): | 100% |
| State average from 631 schools: | 100% |
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: D
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 631 schools: | 54% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 631 schools: | 52% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 103 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
| WALKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (MAGNET): | 4 |
| State average: | 97 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 101 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
| WALKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (MAGNET): | 7 |
| State average: | 190 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 201 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 192 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 273 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 237 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 3
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 1
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 4
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1096 |
| State average: | 1342 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%| Here: | 266 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1404 |
| State average from 1875 schools: | 1542 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%| Here: | 289 |
| State average: | 313 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 98%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1412 |
| State average: | 1546 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 129| Here: | 1283 |
| State average: | 1397 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1477 |
| State average from 1873 schools: | 1629 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%| WALKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (MAGNET): | 279 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 96%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1476 |
| State average: | 1632 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 32| Here: | 1444 |
| State average: | 1532 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%| Here: | 258 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1315 |
| State average: | 1413 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%| Here: | 303 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| WALKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (MAGNET): | 1426 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 1525 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%| Here: | 293 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 98%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| WALKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (MAGNET): | 1429 |
| State average: | 1528 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 117| WALKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (MAGNET): | 1312 |
| State average: | 1414 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1593 |
| State average from 1872 schools: | 1647 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%| Here: | 317 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1605 |
| State average: | 1649 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 67| Here: | 1537 |
| State average: | 1519 |
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 137
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 36| WALKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (MAGNET): | 604 |
| State average from 1891 schools: | 633 |
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 120
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 49| Here: | 629 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 642 |
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 105
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 63| Here: | 657 |
| State average from 1870 schools: | 667 |
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 136
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 50| WALKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (MAGNET): | 610 |
| State average from 1891 schools: | 632 |
Number Sense (max 14): 9
Operations (max 11): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 119
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 63| Here: | 635 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 652 |
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 105
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 68| Here: | 655 |
| State average from 1870 schools: | 663 |
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 118
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 25%| Here: | 279 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 47%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 2%| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 46%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 76%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 59%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.