Young Mens Academy For Academic And Civic Development At Miami Douglas Macarthur South Senior High School in Naranja, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 0.

13990 SW 264 ST
Naranja, FL 33032

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Herbert A. Ammons Middle School (5.5 miles):

98
Doral Performing Arts & Entertainment Academy School (19.4 miles):

80
Southwood Middle School (9.1 miles):

70
Hammocks Middle School (10.7 miles):

53
Paul W. Bell Middle School (17.3 miles):

45
Sunset Heights Charter (Inactive 10/02) School (16.6 miles):

33
Cutler Ridge Middle School (6.4 miles):

18
Young Mens Academy For Academic And Civic Development At Miami Douglas Macarthur South Senior High School:

0
Young Mens Academy For Academic And Civic Development At Miami Douglas Macarthur South Senior High School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Miami-Dade County:

45
Naranja:

0
This School:

0

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (305) 258-7200 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 7631
School type: Senior High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 258-7201
Principal: Cynthia K Valdes-Garcia
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Year 3 in Need of Improvement
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 18
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 118
Senate District: 39
School Web Address: http://macarthursouth.dadeschools.net/

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 110 (89%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 111 (88%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (86%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (85%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (91%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 101 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 102 (88%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (78%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (79%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 114 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 112 (91%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (89%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (87%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 97 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 95 (90%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (81%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (82%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 122 (87%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 126 (89%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (84%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (87%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (89%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (90%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 104 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 106 (89%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (79%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (82%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 76 (89%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 75 (89%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (86%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (88%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29 (88%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (87%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

4%
State average from 62 schools:

49%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

11%
State average from 62 schools:

55%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

81%
State average from 62 schools:

82%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

29%
State average from 62 schools:

57%
Making Math Gains
Here:

23%
State average from 62 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

33%
State average from 62 schools:

62%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

181
State average from 62 schools:

371
Percent Tested
Here:

90%
State average from 62 schools:

97%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: NO

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

68%
State average from 63 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

96%
State average from 63 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (90%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 24
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 43
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 43
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (93%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (85%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

2%
State average from 52 schools:

48%
Meeting High Standards in Math
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

25%
State average from 52 schools:

56%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

86%
State average from 53 schools:

79%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

35%
State average from 53 schools:

54%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 53 schools:

67%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

43%
State average from 53 schools:

59%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

262
State average from 53 schools:

362
Percent Tested
Here:

79%
State average from 53 schools:

97%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: No%

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: S

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

69%
State average from 53 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

92%
State average from 52 schools:

51%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

1179
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

215
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

63%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

13%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

13%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

7
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

1446
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

248
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

45%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

30%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

21%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

24%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

1559
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

241
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

59%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

34%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

6%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

6%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

10
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

4
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1644
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

261
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

71%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

14%
State average:

26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

14%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

8
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1393
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

201
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

8%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

92%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

8%
State average:

17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

8%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

8
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

220
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

73%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

7%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

7%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

5
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

5
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

227
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

92%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

4
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

3
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1311
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

226
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

81%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1498
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

234
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

65%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

10%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

10%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1709
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

273
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

55%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

38%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

30%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1712
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

240
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

59%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

18%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

18%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1633
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

238
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

17%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

75%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

8%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

8%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

2
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1362
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

248
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1360
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

231
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1554
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

240
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 74%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1625
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

257
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1343
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

192
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 94%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

206
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 91%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1449
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

222
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1624
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

252
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 65%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1776
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

259
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1820
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

283
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 1
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 31
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 3
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 55%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 18
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 56%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1298
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

237
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

1303
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

221
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1583
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

246
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1600
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

253
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 77%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1732
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

264
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

213
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 76%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 2%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

248
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1354
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

236
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 82%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1501
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

235
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 83%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1698
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1703
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

237
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1852
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

14
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

599
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

8
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

4
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

4
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

6
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

21
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

616
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

13
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

5
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

4
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

3
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

34
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

625
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

12
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

8
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

4
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

8
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

14
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

652
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

22
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

10
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

3
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

15
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

660
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

22
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

9
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

9
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

5
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 38
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

211
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 68%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 3%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 53%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 23
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

224
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 9%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 48%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1479
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

230
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 81%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 2%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 66%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1434
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

1612
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -178

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1510
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

223
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 85%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 5
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 8
Percent Matched to 2006: 71%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1514
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1558
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -45

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

197
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 95%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 2
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 3

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1681
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

231
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 63%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

1703
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1754
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -51

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1790
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 1
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 77%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1811
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SOUTH SENIOR HIGH:

1762
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 50

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 41
Mean Scale Score
Here:

636
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 13
Literary (max 18): 8
Informational (max 18): 6
Functional (max 18): 7
Initial Understanding (max 10): 4
Interpretation (max 20): 8
Critical Analysis (max 14): 5
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 38
Mean Scale Score
Here:

642
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 12
Literary (max 18): 8
Informational (max 18): 6
Functional (max 18): 8
Initial Understanding (max 10): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 8
Critical Analysis (max 14): 6
Strategies (max 10): 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 37
Mean Scale Score
Here:

665
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 27
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 34
Mean Scale Score
Here:

676
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 20
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 3
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 38
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

223
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 74%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 5%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 47%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 24%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.