City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
78.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Youth Co-Op Charter School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:| Florida: | 45 |
| Miami-Dade County: | 45 |
| Hialeah Gardens: | 62 |
| Youth Co-Op Charter School: | 78 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (305) 819-8855 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 1020
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: DADE
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 819-8455
Principal: Maritza L Aragon
Regular charter school.
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Title 1 school not in need of improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 25
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 112
Senate District: 40
School Web Address: http://yccs.dadeschools.net/
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 54 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 54 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 54 schools: | 86% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 62% |
| State average from 54 schools: | 53% |
Making Reading Gains | YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 75% |
| State average from 54 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading | YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 79% |
| State average from 54 schools: | 61% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 54 schools: | 65% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)| Here: | 612 |
| State average from 54 schools: | 539 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 54 schools: | 60% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 54 schools: | 57% |
Region: 5
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 417 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 417 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 129
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 397
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 397
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 392 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 392 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 124
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 373
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 373
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 341 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 341 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 100
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 322
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 322
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 81% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 78% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 74% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 89% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 66% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 52% |
Making Reading Gains | Here: | 77% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 69% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading | YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 75% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)| Here: | 623 |
| State average from 52 schools: | 566 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 76% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 55% |
Minority Rate| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 97% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 52% |
Region: 5
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 439 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 439 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 153
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 411
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 411
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 410 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 410 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 143
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 384
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 384
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 334 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 334 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 118
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 315
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 315
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 82% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 84% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 51 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains | Here: | 71% |
| State average from 51 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 68% |
| State average from 51 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading | YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 66% |
| State average from 51 schools: | 61% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 51 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 580 |
| State average from 51 schools: | 545 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 51 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 72% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 53% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 52% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 453 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 453 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 151
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 446
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 446
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 419 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 419 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 139
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 412
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 412
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 327 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 327 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 110
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 322
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 322
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1381 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 313 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 23% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 23% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 69% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1590 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 321 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 46% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 77% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1685 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 316 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 81% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1829 |
| State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 333 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 43% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 84% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1860 |
| State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 327 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 43% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 75% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2024 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 339 |
| State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 79% |
| State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 328 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 13% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 4% |
| State average: | 4% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 50% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 344 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 57% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 70% |
| State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1470 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 337 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 80% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1577 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 328 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 46% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 81% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1691 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 338 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 63% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1849 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 351 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 82% |
| State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1838 |
| State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 318 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 65% |
| State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 1984 |
| State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 343 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 47% |
| State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 10% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 90% |
| State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1309 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 301 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1727 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 344 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 09%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1773 |
| State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 332 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1705 |
| State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 310 |
| State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1893 |
| State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 333 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2014 |
| State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 337 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 346 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 336 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1444 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 331 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1661 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 347 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1732 |
| State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 346 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1694 |
| State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 315 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1865 |
| State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 325 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1959 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 337 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 44
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 5 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 100%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 112
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 5 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 15%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 97%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1380 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 313 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1714 |
| State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 342 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 21
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1653 |
| State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 311 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1842 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 335 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1897 |
| State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 334 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2012 |
| State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 336 |
| State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 9
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 313 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 340 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 10
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1400 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 322 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1634 |
| State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 341 |
| State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1668 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 333 |
| State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1738 |
| State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 325 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1871 |
| State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 326 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1983 |
| State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 343 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 630 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Literary (max 18)| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 43 |
| State average: | 97 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 667 |
| State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Literary (max 18)| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 669 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students| Here: | 111 |
| State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 689 |
| State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Functional (max 18)| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students| Here: | 113 |
| State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 705 |
| State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Literary (max 18)| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students| Here: | 108 |
| State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 711 |
| State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Informational (max 18)| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 15 |
| State average: | 12 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 43
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 323 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 74%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined| YOUTH CO-OP CHARTER SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 47%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 88%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 108
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 335 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 72%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 99%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Hialeah Gardens, FL
- Youth Co-Op Charter School in Hialeah Gardens, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: