Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Parenting > Adoption
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-25-2007, 12:41 PM
 
Location: Michigan
29,391 posts, read 55,648,987 times
Reputation: 22044

Advertisements

DALLAS - A man who weighed 558 pounds when a Missouri judge prevented him from adopting a child he and his wife had taken into their home underwent gastric bypass surgery Friday in a bid to win the child back.

Gary Stocklaufer, a 34-year-old truck driver, and his wife claim a judge unfairly discriminated against them because of his weight in deciding to give 4-month-old Max to another couple for possible adoption. The infant from Arlington, who is related to the Stocklaufers, had lived with them since he was a week old.

Man has gastric surgery in adoption bid - Yahoo! News (broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-25-2007, 01:40 PM
 
4,610 posts, read 11,108,145 times
Reputation: 6832
I saw that story yesterday on the news. My heart goes out to him. I wish him well and a quick recovery. I hope he is able to adopt baby Max ASAP! I'm rooting for them both!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2007, 01:56 PM
 
Location: Missouri
6,044 posts, read 24,110,582 times
Reputation: 5183
I have mixed feelings about this. I would have concerns about a couple adopting a baby when one parents has a serious health problem (and weighing over 500 lbs is a serious health problem). However I do sympathize with the couple as they may very well be great parents and are probably attached to the baby by now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2007, 04:42 PM
 
Location: Burlington, VT
484 posts, read 1,945,900 times
Reputation: 267
I don't understand this. If smokers and diabetics can adopt, why nor morbidly obese people?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2007, 10:34 PM
 
Location: Union County, NC
2,115 posts, read 7,091,752 times
Reputation: 1141
Apparently, this couple was good enough to serve as "babysitters" until another couple became interested. In spite of the potential health problems cited, it is rarely ever in the best interest of a child to remove them from the only home they have ever known. To change this boy's caretakers at this stage is devastating. The psychological impact can be permanent. Let's go ahead and open the door to RAD and any number of other issues.

I am most impressed by the dramatic steps this man is taking in an effort to continue parenting this child. This is the sign of a loving father.

Sara
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2007, 07:54 PM
Status: "Spring is here!!!" (set 9 days ago)
 
16,489 posts, read 24,503,277 times
Reputation: 16345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatless Wonder View Post
I don't understand this. If smokers and diabetics can adopt, why nor morbidly obese people?
I agree. I worked in the adoption field for 5 years and it is a fact that morbid obestity can prevent couples from adopting in some cases. Some countries overseas have weight limits to be allowed to adopt from them. I have seen couples where one had cancer previously, where one was in a wheelchair permanently, where one was depressed, bipolar, on psychiatric medications, where one has diabetes or much worse and they passed their homestudies and either adopted or were able to in the future. Yes, obesity brings along with it health risks, but so do other things like diabetes. I hope this gentleman recovers well, loses his weight and is able to adopt. If he is willing to pay $20,000+ dollars to have this surgery, risk his life actually having the surgery and go through the recovery, he darn well deserves to adopt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2007, 09:50 PM
 
Location: Union County, NC
2,115 posts, read 7,091,752 times
Reputation: 1141
Quote:
Originally Posted by brokencrayola View Post
I agree. I worked in the adoption field for 5 years and it is a fact that morbid obestity can prevent couples from adopting in some cases. Some countries overseas have weight limits to be allowed to adopt from them. I have seen couples where one had cancer previously, where one was in a wheelchair permanently, where one was depressed, bipolar, on psychiatric medications, where one has diabetes or much worse and they passed their homestudies and either adopted or were able to in the future. Yes, obesity brings along with it health risks, but so do other things like diabetes. I hope this gentleman recovers well, loses his weight and is able to adopt. If he is willing to pay $20,000+ dollars to have this surgery, risk his life actually having the surgery and go through the recovery, he darn well deserves to adopt.
I don't disagree with your sentiment but I just wanted to note that he is being "gifted" the surgery.

Sara
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2007, 02:17 AM
Status: "Spring is here!!!" (set 9 days ago)
 
16,489 posts, read 24,503,277 times
Reputation: 16345
Well good for him, it is generally out of many people's budget and few insurance companies cover it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2007, 07:08 AM
 
Location: In the sunshine on a ship with a plank
3,413 posts, read 8,844,861 times
Reputation: 2263
I hope he gets the baby- he's definitely devoted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2007, 07:26 AM
Status: "Happy 2024" (set 12 days ago)
 
Location: Texas
8,672 posts, read 22,285,095 times
Reputation: 21370
Default Somehow related to baby...

Another factor in this case which was noted in the local news here is that this couple is somehow related to the baby. I don't know what the relationship is and I know that is not the "be all, end all" but I do think it should be given some consideration in favor of this couple keeping the baby.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Parenting > Adoption

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top