Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-20-2022, 09:23 PM
 
Location: Chicago
6,160 posts, read 5,705,622 times
Reputation: 6193

Advertisements

I'm sure we have all noticed that pickup trucks are getting taller and have much worse visibility from the front. Why is this being done and how is this legal? I thought there were laws about visibility and requirements for pedestrians.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-20-2022, 10:35 PM
 
17,597 posts, read 17,629,777 times
Reputation: 25655
Coworker has a full size truck and two young kids. I sent him a link to a video news story about visibility. Said he’s extra careful now. It isn’t just trucks with these visibility issues. Many crossover/SUVs also have forward blind spots that could result in hitting pedestrians, mostly children or people on bicycles.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2022, 10:45 PM
 
17,597 posts, read 17,629,777 times
Reputation: 25655
https://www.insidehook.com/article/v...getting-bigger

Pretty good article on why trucks have gotten huge
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2022, 10:49 PM
 
Location: San Antonio
1,710 posts, read 4,129,944 times
Reputation: 2718
I remember when pickup trucks were used mainly for work instead of a status symbol, a major selling point was having a low loading height. Trucks then were easy to load and easy to get into and out of. Now, the most a truck usually hauls today is maybe groceries for a week and the oversized ego of the owner. It is utterly ridiculous that the full sized pickup truck is the best selling vehicle in the United States.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2022, 03:13 AM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,326 posts, read 60,500,026 times
Reputation: 60911
I don't know about others, but Ford raised the F150 to get rid of the transmission hump in the back since so many are now Extended or Crew cabs with a rear seat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2022, 04:42 AM
 
Location: Brackenwood
9,971 posts, read 5,669,596 times
Reputation: 22120
The visibility factor is substantially mitigated by front and rear-view cameras and obstacle sensors. They don't do much at speed, but they're quite useful at driveway/parking-lot type speeds. The vehicle in your attached image has front-mounted sensors at a minimum; the kid is standing right in front of two of them. Even in a 20-year-old truck with a lower profile, you'd be hard-pressed to see that kid as close as she's she's standing to the front of the vehicle. So if I had to select a preferred risk mitigation factor in the situation illustrated below, I'll take the hiked-up truck with cameras and sensors over the 20-year-old truck without them.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2022, 04:54 AM
 
17,597 posts, read 17,629,777 times
Reputation: 25655
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bitey View Post
The visibility factor is substantially mitigated by front and rear-view cameras and obstacle sensors. They don't do much at speed, but they're quite useful at driveway/parking-lot type speeds. The vehicle in your attached image has front-mounted sensors at a minimum; the kid is standing right in front of two of them. Even in a 20-year-old truck with a lower profile, you'd be hard-pressed to see that kid as close as she's she's standing to the front of the vehicle. So if I had to select a preferred risk mitigation factor in the situation illustrated below, I'll take the hiked-up truck with cameras and sensors over the 20-year-old truck without them.
Fine if those cameras and censors aren’t obstructed or damaged.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2022, 05:01 AM
 
Location: Brackenwood
9,971 posts, read 5,669,596 times
Reputation: 22120
Quote:
Originally Posted by victimofGM View Post
Fine if those cameras and censors aren’t obstructed or damaged.
"Obstructed?" the entire point of them is to detect obstructions. In any case, where pedestrian safety is concerned I'll take a late-model truck or SUV with a 0.1% chance of having the camera AND sensors damaged over a 20-year-old one with no camera or sensors at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2022, 05:25 AM
 
Location: Chicago
6,160 posts, read 5,705,622 times
Reputation: 6193
Quote:
Originally Posted by outafocus View Post
I remember when pickup trucks were used mainly for work instead of a status symbol, a major selling point was having a low loading height. Trucks then were easy to load and easy to get into and out of. Now, the most a truck usually hauls today is maybe groceries for a week and the oversized ego of the owner. It is utterly ridiculous that the full sized pickup truck is the best selling vehicle in the United States.
They are used for work in rural states. In places like Montana, most of the trucks are beat up or have some kind of company or farm logo on the side. Here in Texas, you'll see these stupid lifted trucks that someone paid half the cost of the truck on modifications. Maybe an easy fix for the problem is a tax on these vehicles. It's amazing how 99% of the world functions just fine without pickup trucks and uses panel vans for most business purposes.

It's a shame we can't have a massive tax on these trucks to encourage people to buy more practical vehicles that are better for the environment and don't wear on roads as much.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bitey View Post
"Obstructed?" the entire point of them is to detect obstructions. In any case, where pedestrian safety is concerned I'll take a late-model truck or SUV with a 0.1% chance of having the camera AND sensors damaged over a 20-year-old one with no camera or sensors at all.
I've got a 1980 Mercedes 300D and the visibility is FAR better than my newer model Honda Civic. Yes, the backup camera is helpful when reversing in the Civic but with the Mercedes, I can clearly see out of all windows, including the rear ones. The rear window is almost at the same angle as a sunroof in the Civic but in the Mercedes it's not as steep so you can see out of it easier. I also also see over the hood and see pretty much anything in the front unless it's a small animal directly in front of the car.

With the truck in photo, I bet you can barely see anything out of that windshield because of how sloped it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2022, 05:31 AM
 
1,112 posts, read 606,309 times
Reputation: 3565
My buddy owns TWO huge GMC trucks. TBF, he is a contractor so he actually does need a "bigger" vehicle for work.

However, as an accountant I know that he's crazy carry the cost of 2 big expensive vehicles. One of them is on a ridiculously expensive lease.

I know for a fact that he bought them for his ego. He could have bought a cheap minivan and it would've served him just as well at easy 1/3 of the price.

Now he is crazy enough to consider leasing a NEW truck when his current lease is over. I told him that he is crazy as heck. Buy out the existing truck (which is in pristine condition) and you are golden for at least another decade or more with zero payments.

He told me that current trucks go for $80,000 and up! Are you nuts?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top