Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,551 posts, read 81,085,957 times
Reputation: 57734
Interesting how close they all were except for one. Still, I have bought 4 pickups since since 1973 and never considered MPG in my decision. My current 2017 F150 for example has the 5.0 Coyote V8 with 385 horsepower, and I went with it in order to tow our 6,000 lb. travel trailer. When not towing and no weight in the back, I can get 20 on the highway, 16 city. EPA when I bought it was 16/19 and on my previous 2007 Ranger, it was 15/20, not much better with only 207 Horsepower.
Interesting how close they all were except for one. Still, I have bought 4 pickups since since 1973 and never considered MPG in my decision. My current 2017 F150 for example has the 5.0 Coyote V8 with 385 horsepower, and I went with it in order to tow our 6,000 lb. travel trailer. When not towing and no weight in the back, I can get 20 on the highway, 16 city. EPA when I bought it was 16/19 and on my previous 2007 Ranger, it was 15/20, not much better with only 207 Horsepower.
The TFL guys also mentioned at one point that it's surprising how close the full-sized (1/2-ton) trucks are to the mid-sized trucks in fuel economy.
The top 3 trucks in the test - the Ridgeline, Tacoma and Ranger, all got about 26mpg, which was about 30% better than the worst truck in the test, which only got 20mpg on the mostly highway route.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.