Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-05-2024, 10:49 AM
 
Location: We_tside PNW (Columbia Gorge) / CO / SA TX / Thailand
34,700 posts, read 58,012,579 times
Reputation: 46172

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by roodd279 View Post
We have the technology to assure AC is where is supposed to be while on the ground.

We do not. We have the technology to know where it is - but not to "assure" it is anywhere in particular, other than give the pilot directions, and hope he understands them. That's it. At all airports, and aircraft, everywhere. The only reason planes don't land on other planes every day is because the Pilot doesn't pull out into to traffic - there is no "remote" way to stop him or some other technology.
Very simple to add blinking lights / alarms / closed loop to ATC, that an aircraft has violated positional ATC clearance.

'lane departure warning'.... As is could be considered.

No, it would not STOP a crew from violating... But that feature is possible as well (but very restrictive and unlikely, yet).

This incident will add impetus to automated ATC of aircraft. Unlikely soon, but arriving eventually.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-05-2024, 11:15 AM
 
2,215 posts, read 1,321,801 times
Reputation: 3378
Could there be a language barrier? The Control Tower addressed the Coast Guard plane as "Number 1", and the latter repeated the instruction "as Number 1".
What was meant by "Number 1" ???
Why did not they use local Japanese language instead of the badly pronounced standardized aviation English? After all, the Coast Guard plane was on a domestic flight.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2024, 11:17 AM
 
Location: Elysium
12,385 posts, read 8,141,466 times
Reputation: 9194
Quote:
Originally Posted by orbiter View Post
Could there be a language barrier? The Control Tower addressed the Coast Guard plane as "Number 1", and the latter repeated the instruction "as Number 1".
What was meant by "Number 1" ???
Why did not they use local Japanese language instead of the badly pronounced standardized aviation English? After all, the Coast Guard plane was on a domestic flight.
Because English is language for all the aviators in the airspace
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2024, 11:21 AM
 
2,215 posts, read 1,321,801 times
Reputation: 3378
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taiko View Post
Because English is language for all the aviators in the airspace
I looked up some YouTube videos. In Shanghai, Beijing, the ATC communicated with their own in Mandarin. This is also the practice in some parts of Spain and France.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2024, 12:46 PM
 
4,022 posts, read 1,874,326 times
Reputation: 8647
Very simple to add blinking lights / alarms / closed loop to ATC, that an aircraft has violated positional ATC clearance.

Similar but not identical system was already in place. It was broken / inoperative.


There is no system of which you can conceive that cannot fail. This was one of those times.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2024, 01:28 AM
 
Location: NJ
23,862 posts, read 33,533,504 times
Reputation: 30764
It's amazing that everyone on the plane survived considering it burst into flames on impact. One article said there were 8 infants on the flight. Another article claims that two passengers lost their pets. It didn't sound like the pets were in the cabin.

They supposedly have both black boxes from the coast guard plane but not the other one.


Japan Airlines expects massive losses after deadly collision at Tokyo airport
Japan Airlines estimates the collision at Tokyo's Haneda airport will cost the company more than $100 million

Quote:
All 379 passengers aboard JAL flight 516 were safely evacuated before the jet was consumed by a fire that took more than six hours to extinguish.

But five of the six crew of the smaller aircraft were killed, with the pilot surviving but badly injured. The Coast Guard plane had been on its way to deliver aid to areas on Japan's west coast that were hit by an earthquake.

The incident is under investigation by Japanese transport authorities. Local media reports said police are looking into possible professional negligence in the case, Reuters reported

Japan Airlines estimated on Thursday the accident would result in an operating loss of about 15 billion yen ($105 million).

The company said the loss of the aircraft will be covered by insurance. The airline is also discussing compensation with individual passengers after two people said their pets died in the accident, JAL officials said.

U.S. insurer AIG was reportedly the lead insurer on a $130 million "all-risks" policy for the two-year old plane that was destroyed in the incident, according to Reuters.

Japanese safety experts search for voice data as workers clear plane debris from runway collision

Quote:
Transport safety officials searched for a voice recorder from the severely burned fuselage of a Japan Airlines plane, seeking crucial information on what caused a collision with a small coast guard plane on the runway at Tokyo’s Haneda airport.

On Saturday, heavy machinery worked for a second day to remove debris of the burned Airbus A320 for storage in a hangar to allow the runway to reopen. Transport Minister Tetsuo Saito said officials were aiming to reopen the runway Monday. Wreckage of the Japan Coast Guard plane had been cleared.

JTSB experts have so far secured both the flight and voice data recorders from the coast guard’s Bombardier Dash-8 and a flight data recorder from the JAL plane to find out what happened in the last few minutes before Tuesday’s fatal collision.

New details have also emerged from media footage at Haneda airport. NHK television reported footage from its monitoring camera set up at the Haneda airport showed that the coast guard plane moved on to the runway and stopped there for about 40 seconds before the collision.

In the footage, the coast guard aircraft is seen entering the runway from the C5 taxiway, then shortly after the passenger plane touches down right behind and rams into it, creating an orange fireball. The JAL airliner, covered with flames and spewing gray smoke, continues down the runway before coming to a stop.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2024, 06:34 AM
 
Location: Elysium
12,385 posts, read 8,141,466 times
Reputation: 9194
Quote:
Originally Posted by orbiter View Post
I looked up some YouTube videos. In Shanghai, Beijing, the ATC communicated with their own in Mandarin. This is also the practice in some parts of Spain and France.
Well at least until the accident in part caused by other international flight crews not understanding the internal communications of two or three parties and thus not get a heads up by listening in occurs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2024, 08:47 AM
 
46,946 posts, read 25,972,151 times
Reputation: 29440
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roselvr View Post
It's amazing that everyone on the plane survived considering it burst into flames on impact. One article said there were 8 infants on the flight.
A pilot friend of mine commented that apparently the passengers followed instructions to leave their stuff behind - and that he wasn't sure other nationalities would have been as disciplined. But it's a huge "Well done!" to the cabin crew in that flight, and I hope they get something nice in their next paycheck.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2024, 10:36 AM
 
Location: Elysium
12,385 posts, read 8,141,466 times
Reputation: 9194
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
A pilot friend of mine commented that apparently the passengers followed instructions to leave their stuff behind - and that he wasn't sure other nationalities would have been as disciplined. But it's a huge "Well done!" to the cabin crew in that flight, and I hope they get something nice in their next paycheck.
That really doesn't conform with Japanese culture
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2024, 05:52 AM
 
Location: Metro Washington DC
15,427 posts, read 25,801,824 times
Reputation: 10450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roselvr View Post
It's amazing that everyone on the plane survived considering it burst into flames on impact. One article said there were 8 infants on the flight. Another article claims that two passengers lost their pets. It didn't sound like the pets were in the cabin.

They supposedly have both black boxes from the coast guard plane but not the other one.
I’m wondering how many non-ambulatory disabled pax were on board and how they got out?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top