Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Books
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-31-2015, 05:46 PM
 
Location: Southern Illinois
10,364 posts, read 20,788,709 times
Reputation: 15643

Advertisements

I was so thrilled this past weekend--after months of being overly busy, I finally got to sit down and enjoy a novel and had just picked up The Ladies of Missalonghi from the Goodwill so I settled in to read it. I enjoyed it very much and as I often do when I like a book, I looked it up on Amazon to see what others are saying about it. One of the reviewers mentioned that it was a complete rip-off of a book formerly written by L.M. Montgomery called The Blue Castle. I went ahead and ordered that one for my Kindle and read it right away, so I read the two back-to-back and I have to agree--it was a total rip-off. It was so close that it felt like she had to have had the book there with her to consult with for details! The only difference is that one is set in Australia and the other in Canada and fortunately, I liked Montgomery's version better. I remember how much I loved reading The Thorn Birds years ago, so this was a real disappointment.

I won't go into on this post, but I was also disappointed with The Education of Little Tree, though for different reasons. Anyone else ever lost faith in a beloved book or author?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-31-2015, 05:52 PM
 
Location: SoCal desert
8,091 posts, read 15,427,067 times
Reputation: 15038
Lois McMaster Bujold.

Love her science fiction with passion.
Hate her fantasy with vehemence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2015, 05:56 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
3,297 posts, read 3,021,473 times
Reputation: 12600
Stephen King. I loved his early books and I was always so excited when a new one came out. I hardly ever purchased hardcover books, but I would go out and buy his books in hardcover right away.

And then came The Tommyknockers. I started it off with that same feeling of tingly anticipation I had experienced each time, and for a while I tried to feel the same enthusiasm as before, but after several hundred pages I had to admit that this book seemed different, and not in a good way.

Somewhere along the line, he changed. The violence increased exponentially, and the lovingly detailed descriptions of everyday life and objects faded away. I kept reading his books for several years more, but for me, none came close to his earlier works, such as The Shining, The Stand and The Dead Zone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2015, 07:05 PM
 
Location: So Ca
26,717 posts, read 26,776,017 times
Reputation: 24775
Quote:
Originally Posted by irootoo View Post
Stephen King. none came close to his earlier works....
Did you read 11/22/63? That's the only one of King's I've ever read, but it was one of the most fascinating books I've read in a long time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2015, 07:12 PM
 
Location: Philaburbia
41,946 posts, read 75,144,160 times
Reputation: 66884
If you've read more than two or three books by Anne Rivers Siddons, you'll find she occasionally uses the same supporting characters, the same historical events, the same plots, subplots and sub-subplots, and in one instance in particular -- a scene in an Atlanta night club in both Peachtree Road and Downtown -- the same collection of paragraphs of description and dialogue, changing only the characters' names. I guess it's OK if you're plagiarizing yourself?

I enjoy some of her books for their soapy, Southern Gothic goodness, but after I read Downtown and recognized pages of dialogue from the earlier book, I started reading her stuff more for writing flaws than for the story itself.

Quote:
Originally Posted by irootoo View Post
Stephen King. I loved his early books and I was always so excited when a new one came out. I hardly ever purchased hardcover books, but I would go out and buy his books in hardcover right away.

And then came The Tommyknockers.
He disappointed me after Carrie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2015, 07:27 PM
 
Location: Southern Illinois
10,364 posts, read 20,788,709 times
Reputation: 15643
Quote:
Originally Posted by irootoo View Post
Stephen King. I loved his early books and I was always so excited when a new one came out. I hardly ever purchased hardcover books, but I would go out and buy his books in hardcover right away.

And then came The Tommyknockers. I started it off with that same feeling of tingly anticipation I had experienced each time, and for a while I tried to feel the same enthusiasm as before, but after several hundred pages I had to admit that this book seemed different, and not in a good way.

Somewhere along the line, he changed. The violence increased exponentially, and the lovingly detailed descriptions of everyday life and objects faded away. I kept reading his books for several years more, but for me, none came close to his earlier works, such as The Shining, The Stand and The Dead Zone.
Yes I used to read his books too and can't for the life of me remember what turned me off but something similar no doubt. Tried to read another later but his language was so harsh.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohiogirl81 View Post
If you've read more than two or three books by Anne Rivers Siddons, you'll find she occasionally uses the same supporting characters, the same historical events, the same plots, subplots and sub-subplots, and in one instance in particular -- a scene in an Atlanta night club in both Peachtree Road and Downtown -- the same collection of paragraphs of description and dialogue, changing only the characters' names. I guess it's OK if you're plagiarizing yourself?

I enjoy some of her books for their soapy, Southern Gothic goodness, but after I read Downtown and recognized pages of dialogue from the earlier book, I started reading her stuff more for writing flaws than for the story itself.
LOL, I was kind of thinking that it's OK if you plagiarize yourself but it does show quite a lot of laziness and she should realize that her fans are going to be reading very closely.

And fans are big--that's what got Colleen McCullough in trouble with her book--she hadn't counted on the many loyal fans of L.M. Montgomery who were searching far and wide to read every last one of her books. I'm wondering if LMM had sunk into near obscurity when CM wrote her book?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2015, 07:34 PM
 
Location: Southern Illinois
10,364 posts, read 20,788,709 times
Reputation: 15643
I just looked her up on wiki. She wrote Thorn Birds in 1977 and Ladies of Miss in 1987, so obviously she was a successful writer and LMM was not obscure at that time, though the book was. She def failed to take the fans into account. She died in January of this year at 77.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2015, 08:19 PM
 
Location: So Ca
26,717 posts, read 26,776,017 times
Reputation: 24775
Quote:
Originally Posted by stepka View Post
fans are big--that's what got Colleen McCullough in trouble with her book--she hadn't counted on the many loyal fans of L.M. Montgomery who were searching far and wide to read every last one of her books.
What trouble did McCullough have?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2015, 09:35 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
3,297 posts, read 3,021,473 times
Reputation: 12600
Quote:
Originally Posted by CA4Now View Post
Did you read 11/22/63? That's the only one of King's I've ever read, but it was one of the most fascinating books I've read in a long time.
Yes, it's funny, I loved the first part, thinking "OMG, it's the old Stephen King, the author I loved," and then the last part of the book just didn't have that same feel. And then I read that he said he had written the first part years earlier and then finished it at a later time. So something really changed in his style for me between the old stuff and the new.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2015, 09:58 PM
 
Location: Back in Dallas Texas where I belong!
269 posts, read 913,511 times
Reputation: 179
Janet Evanovich. We are 22 books in and it's the same book over and over. The characters never grow, I seriously think she has the first book on her computer and does a search to change out a few things. Sadly, it took me buying the first 18 books before I realized this. Now I get them at the library. They are easy, fun reads, just predictable carbon copies of her other books.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Books

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top