Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 06-30-2020, 08:54 AM
 
Location: Sun City West, Arizona
50,840 posts, read 24,347,720 times
Reputation: 32967

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Futuremauian View Post
Your links provide some compelling evidence in support of Columbus!

Others on this thread vehemently disagree and think he was a monster.

Who to believe? Who to believe indeed?

Popcorn anyone?
Compelling evidence? Do you think there might be a bit of bias in an article published by the National Christopher Columbus Association?

 
Old 06-30-2020, 08:55 AM
 
Location: Sun City West, Arizona
50,840 posts, read 24,347,720 times
Reputation: 32967
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boompa11B View Post
The so-called "Civil War" was about tariffs and states rights and only tangentially about slavery. The politicians were as full of crap in 1861 as they are today.
Go back and read the actual articles of secession written by the Southern states.
 
Old 06-30-2020, 09:49 AM
 
Location: Lahaina, Hi.
6,384 posts, read 4,834,185 times
Reputation: 11326
Quote:
Originally Posted by phetaroi View Post
Compelling evidence? Do you think there might be a bit of bias in an article published by the National Christopher Columbus Association?
As opposed to the smear-job article cited in INDIAN COUNTRY TODAY? Could it possibly contain a "bit of bias" as well?
 
Old 06-30-2020, 10:06 AM
 
4,143 posts, read 1,877,676 times
Reputation: 5776
Quote:
Originally Posted by Futuremauian View Post
As opposed to the smear-job article cited in INDIAN COUNTRY TODAY? Could it possibly contain a "bit of bias" as well?
Do you seriously need for me to copy the list of sources used for that article and post them here for you? The list that I already provided you?

And yet, you did not ask for any sources for the article that supports your own point of view, nor show an equal skepticism for it. You are demonstrating your own bias. Additionaly, the unwarranted use of the word "smear-job" further betrays one's bias.

You really need to read the Helpful Guidelines (posted as a sticky at the top of this forum) so that you can learn what debate is. Either present your facts to back up your assertions or take your opinions to the Politics & Other Controversies forum. This is the Debate forum.

Last edited by Rachel NewYork; 06-30-2020 at 10:18 AM..
 
Old 06-30-2020, 10:16 AM
 
Location: Midwest
9,423 posts, read 11,176,605 times
Reputation: 17924
Quote:
Originally Posted by ukrkoz View Post
Speaking of Orwell. They are taking down HIS statue too. No one really knows why.
Because the founders of the hoped-for New Soviet Union despise all truth-tellers.
 
Old 06-30-2020, 10:21 AM
 
3,217 posts, read 2,360,306 times
Reputation: 2742
I've always wondered why Columbus gets more importance than others like Amerigo Vespucci for whom the continents of the western hemisphere are named? Columbus never set foot on the mainland, didn't even realize it was there. There's also evidence that the Norse visited before him.
 
Old 06-30-2020, 10:21 AM
 
Location: Lahaina, Hi.
6,384 posts, read 4,834,185 times
Reputation: 11326
Quote:
Originally Posted by NC~Mom View Post
Sure, you can call it a liberal, conservative thing, but in reality, it's showing racists they no longer have any power in America. It seems being a Liberal is being on the right side of history.
Tearing down statues doesn't do anything of the kind. It is an act of vindictiveness which only serves to increase the polarization of America.

Many believe the whipped up frenzy of mob violence is the result of outside influences seeking to destroy American strength. Russia, for example, has had a long history of disinformation campaigns.

Will destroying vestiges of America's history make past slavery go away? Of course not! If it did, we would all be in favor of it.

Trashing the memories of our past presidents for participating in activities that have now been deemed unacceptable helps no one. They were human, and humans make mistakes. All of us!
 
Old 06-30-2020, 10:25 AM
 
4,143 posts, read 1,877,676 times
Reputation: 5776
Quote:
Originally Posted by ukrkoz View Post
Speaking of Orwell. They are taking down HIS statue too. No one really knows why.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dwatted Wabbit View Post
Because the founders of the hoped-for New Soviet Union despise all truth-tellers.
Check out stories before posting them here. Posting unsubstantiated stories on the Great Debates forum that are actually news parodies or hoaxes (such as Orwell's statue) will result in a warning at the very least. At the most, it will be viewed as trolling. https://www.mediaite.com/news/no-a-g...g-journalists/
 
Old 06-30-2020, 10:44 AM
 
Location: The High Desert
16,093 posts, read 10,757,764 times
Reputation: 31499
Quote:
Originally Posted by phetaroi View Post
Compelling evidence? Do you think there might be a bit of bias in an article published by the National Christopher Columbus Association?
Right -- There are different voices but there is "a bit of bias" surrounding this entire topic. You can pick and choose your experts. Everybody has an opinion after 528 years but un-twisted facts are sparse. It is hard to know about one individual's intentions or actions after so many people have weighed in on the guy. Given only the facts that we know for certain, he did something worth remembering. A few less statues won't matter that much. He's dead and won't care.
 
Old 06-30-2020, 10:58 AM
 
Location: Sun City West, Arizona
50,840 posts, read 24,347,720 times
Reputation: 32967
Quote:
Originally Posted by Futuremauian View Post
As opposed to the smear-job article cited in INDIAN COUNTRY TODAY? Could it possibly contain a "bit of bias" as well?
Did I say the other article would have no bias? No, I did not. What I pointed out was that you act as if an article by a society that pushes the Columbus story is the bottom line.

I lived in the Washington, D.C. area for most of my life. And from time to time I would go to lectures -- free lectures -- at the Smithsonian (and other venues, as well). I imagine that there are quite a few people in the greater D.C. area who would support Columbus statues as you do. But if one of those free lectures on a Saturday was about Columbus, almost none of those supporters would go and listen to the lecture. When it comes right down to it, and you take the culture wars out of it, virtually no one gives a flying fart about Columbus.

He never even set foot on North American soil.

He "discovered" various Caribbean islands.

And your average Columbus statue lover couldn't pass a simple quiz about the man.

This is about culture wars and nothing else.

Last edited by phetaroi; 06-30-2020 at 12:03 PM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top