The Los Angeles Homeless Containment Thread (Sacramento: city limits, newspapers, status)

[2sleepy]

Originally Posted by CaliRestoration

Realistically, the best way to fix it is to find a way to put these people to work. Handouts, and entitlements have not fixed the problem and never will. All you will get is a situation like New York where taxpayers are now on the hook to house 60,000+ people a night.

Who wants to bet real cash that New Yorkers are going to be paying to house 70,000 people during Trump's second term?

I would bet cash that Trump doesn't serve a second term before I would bet that NY will quit housing their homeless because the requirement for them to do so is in their state constitution

Combating homelessness today - NY Daily News

[jm1982]

Originally Posted by TCROX

Anybody wanna guess how much crime in LA is NOT being reported???!!!
dirty jerry's army is now claiming turf many .many areas of LA and SO Cal.... only by removing them from the streets will we get a real chance to help everyone! I also wonder if LA area will be the real experiment of how to really ramp up the crime and steal the tax money..
https://www.sbsun.com/2018/04/09/pan...general-store/
dirty, dirty jerry
people still love him and want more of this- free housing, free everything to ALL ! So you harassed and sliced up some innocent shoppers- get back out there amigo!

I’m sure a ton of homeless crime is not reported . Or we don’t hear about it in the news .
Also many people realize the homeless are treated like a protected class above the law so they probably figure what’s the point of reporting .

[TCROX]

YES! They are a protected class, well put---after all.....they are the boots-on-the-ground for the left wing elite-
and .....funny how the environmentalists are DEAD silent on this whole thing.... no federal action on the Santa Ana river Wollystar or its habitat for instance and etc..
a LOT of law enforcement agencies that would gladly fine or imprison a hardworking taxpayer for violating some obscure environmental issue seem to be standing down big time for the dirty jerry's excon army and their buds

[TCROX]

Time to really take these next elections very seriously and reach out to conservative change candidates..we must save California and LA and not allow them to become a liberal owned cesspools like other dirty,crime-filled states and cities in the US

[CaliRestoration]

Originally Posted by 2sleepy

I would bet cash that Trump doesn't serve a second term before I would bet that NY will quit housing their homeless because the requirement for them to do so is in their state constitution

Combating homelessness today - NY Daily News

No one said New York would stop housing 60,000 homeless on taxpayer dime. The fact that it's in their constitution is even more laughable.

But since you brought it up, how much cash on the Trump bet? Would you be comfortable betting say $5,000 of that precious pension money?

[2sleepy]

Originally Posted by CaliRestoration

No one said New York would stop housing 60,000 homeless on taxpayer dime. The fact that it's in their constitution is even more laughable.

But since you brought it up, how much cash on the Trump bet? Would you be comfortable betting say $5,000 of that precious pension money?

Then I guess I misunderstood this, maybe you can explain exactly what you were talking about?

Originally Posted by CaliRestoration View Post
Realistically, the best way to fix it is to find a way to put these people to work. Handouts, and entitlements have not fixed the problem and never will. All you will get is a situation like New York where taxpayers are now on the hook to house 60,000+ people a night.

Who wants to bet real cash that New Yorkers are going to be paying to house 70,000 people during Trump's second term?

And I never said I would bet anything, try reading that again

[CaliRestoration]

Originally Posted by 2sleepy

Then I guess I misunderstood this, maybe you can explain exactly what you were talking about?

What aren't you getting?

And I never said I would bet anything, try reading that again

Yeah I wouldn't make that bet either.

[Finper]

Originally Posted by 2sleepy

Then I guess I misunderstood this, maybe you can explain exactly what you were talking about?



And I never said I would bet anything, try reading that again

He was asking you a question about the bet.....

[jm1982]

Originally Posted by TCROX

YES! They are a protected class, well put---after all.....they are the boots-on-the-ground for the left wing elite-
and .....funny how the environmentalists are DEAD silent on this whole thing.... no federal action on the Santa Ana river Wollystar or its habitat for instance and etc..
a LOT of law enforcement agencies that would gladly fine or imprison a hardworking taxpayer for violating some obscure environmental issue seem to be standing down big time for the dirty jerry's excon army and their buds

I guess used drug needles and human waste aren’t an environmental issue for them .

[jm1982]

2sleepy you showed your true colors when you said you didn’t want the homeless in your town .

If homeless just keep to themselves and don’t cause problems why don’t you want them in Sacramento?