Conservative High schools without CRT (Oakland: low income, crimes, incomes)

[roadtrip75]

Originally Posted by jgn2013

Is CRT inherently racist?

Some people say that it simply teaches people about America's history without white-washing it and ignoring redlining, the Black Codes, Jim Crow, Native American issues, slavery etc.

CRT massively overemphasizes those issues. CRT has convinced people that redlining had a huge effect on today's racial disparities, but in actuality its effect is zero or near zero.

[AnsleyPark]

Originally Posted by Vizini

AnsleyPark: "That's really not the way it works on an individual level..." Let me introduce you to Marc Lamont Hill, a Ph.D, former analyst on CNN, and proponent of CRT. He posted this short video clip himself on Twitter saying all white people are inherently racist when asked the question. https://twitter.com/marclamonthill/s...574401?lang=en

Seriously? A 5 second clip is what you base your opinion on? The statement (taken out of context) of ONE person? See, your unbridled bias is showing here. Don't be afraid of CRT.

[EscAlaMike]

Originally Posted by AnsleyPark

Seriously? A 5 second clip is what you base your opinion on? The statement (taken out of context) of ONE person? See, your unbridled bias is showing here. Don't be afraid of CRT.

Out of context? LOL. He tweeted it himself. You obviously haven't studied CRT. I studied it in high school when it was clandestinely taught to me, and I studied it in college when it was directly and overtly taught to me.

[AnsleyPark]

Originally Posted by EscAlaMike

Out of context? LOL. He tweeted it himself. You obviously haven't studied CRT. I studied it in high school when it was clandestinely taught to me, and I studied it in college when it was directly and overtly taught to me.

sure....

[Vizini]

Well, AnsleyPark, if he didn't tweet it, who did? Just go to Marc Lamont Hill's Twitter page and scroll down to July of last year and you'll see it. Some things are very easy to find.

https://twitter.com/marclamonthill/s...83162665574401

[AnsleyPark]

Originally Posted by Vizini

Well, AnsleyPark, if he didn't tweet it, who did? Just go to Marc Lamont Hill's Twitter page and scroll down to July of last year and you'll see it. Some things are very easy to find.

https://twitter.com/marclamonthill/s...83162665574401

I really don't care who tweeted what and never brought that up as an issue. The continued contrivance is amusing at best. Later tater.

[Vizini]

AnsleyPark, you don't care... Hmm. Well, when I first posted that tweet, you said it was taken out of context. You cared enough to say that. But when it's easily proved that Lamont actually posted it himself, then you don't care. Try to get your story straight.

[AustinTraveler]

Originally Posted by Vizini

AnsleyPark, you don't care... Hmm. Well, when I first posted that tweet, you said it was taken out of context. You cared enough to say that. But when it's easily proved that Lamont actually posted it himself, then you don't care. Try to get your story straight.

Don't you have anyone else to play with? Go away.

[Vizini]

Why don't you tell AnsleyPark to go away. He's the one spouting nonsense.

[HarryWhom]

Go back a page and reread Pincho-toot posts. He nailed it, just the facts. Anybody with any amount of common sense would realize that you're comparing two people, Hill and Wheeler, at polar opposites. They work on the principle that "the squeaky wheel gets the grease."