Quote:
Originally Posted by newtovenice
They've all been in VERY affluent, suburban areas. Interesting, isn't it. Parkland is a VERY wealthy community. Sandy Hook was a wealthy community. Columbine was a .... well, you get the picture.
Never inner city, never poor and mostly white.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redguard57
It makes sense in a way. The inner city and poor districts already deal with violence in a number of ways that doesn't make the news at all.
When bad things happen to pretty, affluent people, the media and public tend to care more.
|
Inner city schools probably have shootings or other mayhem every day, it just doesn't make the news. A couple weeks ago my former system had a shooting related to an attempted robbery at dismissal and a gang related beat down and stabbing the next day at a different high school. Both were one day stories.
Back to the metal detectors. Some school systems have had them for decades, New York City and Detroit come to mind, but, like it or not, it all comes down to cost and risk assessment.
When they were considered for the rural, middle class school I taught at for 25 years the estimate was north of $300K to install them. Multiply that by 180 schools in the system. The decision at that time was to increase school based security officers.
We eventually started to limit access and lock all exterior doors and funnel everyone to the front entrance. That was problematic because we had so many (up to two dozen at one time) temporary classrooms which students were constantly going to.
And yes, over those 25 years I was at that school we confiscated our share of weapons, including guns. In almost every case the offender was reported by another student.