Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-13-2023, 07:42 PM
 
3,438 posts, read 4,456,961 times
Reputation: 3683

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by elnina View Post
Not going into the laws and technicalities - maybe building a new city from scratch isn't totally bad idea. It would be a great way of testing if we actually could live in a city that is not totally car dependent, plastered with concrete parking lots and big box supermarkets, sustainable and environmental friendly.
Not sure what's his idea about planning the city, but it could be a resident choice to live in such city or not.
No one would be "made" to live there if that means "suffering" of any kind.

Like any other "master planned" development, one lives under rule by corporation controlled by the developer - which is not a "yesteryear" product. Perhaps the investors here will do something different but the developer will likely impose all sorts of restrictions to control how people are "permitted" to utilize their property. Not sure what you are trying to say about "resident choice". Your choice would be whether to live there or elsewhere. If you are a "resident" then you would not have a choice other than to choose to no longer be a resident by moving elsewhere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-13-2023, 09:25 PM
 
Location: Tricity, PL
61,743 posts, read 87,194,708 times
Reputation: 131741
Right, but without at least some rules people who initially agree to live in such "yesterday city" will turn it to "today city" in no time, and this expensive concept will become futile.
People living in HOA communities also make their informed choice and most love the rules.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2023, 05:04 AM
 
3,438 posts, read 4,456,961 times
Reputation: 3683
Quote:
Originally Posted by elnina View Post
Right, but without at least some rules people who initially agree to live in such "yesterday city" will turn it to "today city" in no time, and this expensive concept will become futile.
People living in HOA communities also make their informed choice and most love the rules.

Utter nonsense. The choice in much of the US is not "whether HOA" but rather "which HOA". The only persons that "love the rules" are those that profit from them financially or via ego - i.e., HOA board members and HOA vendors. You have zero evidence to support your statement. The large number of HOA cases on court dockets indicates a considerable departure from the image you want to portray. If you want to have ordinances then you can adopt constitutionally compliant ones thru elected officials.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2024, 01:50 AM
 
Location: Tricity, PL
61,743 posts, read 87,194,708 times
Reputation: 131741
Now this:
Saudi Arabia has announced plans to construct a mind-bending 'upside down skyscraper' as part of its rapid development of NEOM.

More detailed description here: (with video and many pictures)
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...city-NEOM.html

In short:
That ultra-luxury upside-down skyscraper' built INSIDE a 1,500ft mountain and accessed through an underground canal is a part of trillion-pound plans for futuristic city NEOM.

Upon arrival, visitors would emerge into a cavernous space built within the mountain, surrounded by all manner of facilities, including decadent hotels and apartments, retail spaces, and 'leisure and entertainment zones'.

The upper floors of the construction will be replete with lush gardens and viewing platforms from which visitors can enjoy the breathtaking landscapes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2024, 11:44 AM
 
8,869 posts, read 6,882,561 times
Reputation: 8689
Seems like it would be cheaper to build it from the ground up.

The logistics sound off-the-charts difficult.

The structure...how stable is it? What about after you dig out giant caverns? Or do you literally have to spent another bil to hold the "sky" up?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2024, 09:54 PM
 
Location: Tricity, PL
61,743 posts, read 87,194,708 times
Reputation: 131741
Sure, but I think they just want to shock the world with their innovations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2024, 12:28 AM
 
3,438 posts, read 4,456,961 times
Reputation: 3683
Atlantis.


Noticed the architectural renderings omitted the barriers that would inherently be required to protect against falls from all of those ledges
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2024, 06:59 AM
 
Location: In Little Ping's Maple Dictatorship
335 posts, read 154,985 times
Reputation: 880
Quote:
Originally Posted by elnina View Post
Saudi Arabia announced its plans to build a desert linear city, called The Line, (a vertical city) on a scale never seen before in human history. Centered around a main high-speed transportation network, The Line’s street-less, car-less design was touted as the future of human habitation.

The city - stretching from the Red City to the city of Tabuk 110 miles (177km) away - along with its estimated 9 million inhabitants would be entirely car-less, and instead be tied together by a high-speed rail system that could travel from one end of The Line to the other in just 20 minutes.
The city was designed to only be 200 meters (656 feet) wide, but 500 meters (1,640 feet) tall and 170 kilometers (105 miles) long. Vertical layering of homes, offices, green spaces, and public schools as well as year-round climate control of all indoor and outdoor spaces will create a high quality of life.
It sounds like they took their inspiration from an ant hill.

No thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2024, 01:44 PM
 
Location: Sunnybrook Farm
4,542 posts, read 2,687,302 times
Reputation: 13090
Well, I guess if you rule an absolute monarchy with vast sums of money, you can do whatever damn fool thing you want.

Not very interesting, honestly. It's just the modern equivalent of the Egyptian Pyramids.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2024, 03:05 PM
 
Location: Howard County, Maryland
16,560 posts, read 10,643,864 times
Reputation: 36576
I can see at least one advantage of building a city inside a mountain. It's got to be a lot cooler (as in, lower temperature) than being outside in a hot climate like Saudi Arabia's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top