Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Vermont
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-25-2010, 09:35 AM
 
Location: Mammoth Lakes, CA
3,360 posts, read 8,386,514 times
Reputation: 8595

Advertisements

I'm about 10 years away from retirement and am a native Californian, still living in that state.

For 20 years I have spent every summer hiking in Vermont and spending a lot of time in VT, usually 5 weeks every summer. I've been in 49 states and Vermont has something very special to it. There are more beautiful states, but none that have that nostalgic feel to it as VT. I just feel at home in VT, always have. The general stores, the lack of crowds, the attitude of the people... I love it.

Anticipating eventual retirement, I've also spent Christmas break for two weeks in VT to see if I could handle the winter. No problem.

However, the property taxes are truly horrific. California has ridiculous property taxes, but nothing can approach Vermont! Because of the real estate crash, prices have declined dramatically in VT, but the property taxes remain crushingly oppressive.

For instance, there is a great house for $350,000 in beautiful Woodstock on an acre. The property taxes? $10,000! In Colorado, a home for the same price on 20 acres would be about $1,100. Every day I scour real estate listings all across the state, and every single house has property taxes through the roof, even in the Northeast Kingdom. Once in awhile, I find a house that has property taxes below $5,000, but usually the house is a shack that no one would want to live in.

Vermont would be a desirable retirement destination for many people, but the property tax situation is usurious. I accept that taxes are inevitable whenever we are, but it's tragic that countless good people are prevented from moving to VT or retiring there because the property tax bill would gobble up much of a fixed income. I will probably end up retiring to Colorada, simply because the property tax situation there is favorable. I would prefer Vermont, though.

Rant over.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-25-2010, 01:14 PM
 
Location: Vermont
5,439 posts, read 16,855,804 times
Reputation: 2651
I don't know Woodstock but our taxes are 1.6438% of the assessed value ... most of that goes to education it seems.
that would make the taxes on the 350k place, assuming its assessed at 350k for < $6000.


I see taxes on a 1 year old 1500 sq ft 3/2 house on 1 acre in Waitsfield at $4400.

$400k 2600 sq ft home on 4 acres taxes are $6500 - also almost new, just a few years old
Located just minutes from Waitsfield Village. This home has been beautifully renovated with new granite kitchen counters & custom cabinets, new hardwood floors, fresh paint & high performance Hardiplank siding. Kitchen stove is an industrial Imperial Range. Relax to the sounds of the babbling brook from the Sunroom. Full basement. Treehouse included!

Last edited by joe moving; 12-25-2010 at 01:23 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2010, 06:08 PM
 
23,590 posts, read 70,358,767 times
Reputation: 49221
Sounds about right to me?

Vermont is a small state. It has large expenses. A+B = ???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2010, 12:49 AM
 
Location: Longmont, CO
48 posts, read 245,144 times
Reputation: 78
Another thing to check is how recent that $10,000 number is. With the market having declined so much in the past couple years, it's possible you're seeing an old number. I too am originally from California and one thing that makes Vermont desirable to us is that services haven't been gutted to appease those that want lower taxes.

Just my 2¢...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2010, 03:26 AM
 
Location: on a dirt road in Waitsfield,Vermont
2,186 posts, read 6,822,169 times
Reputation: 1148
Real estate prices in Vermont have not crashed, especially when compared to like places like Nevada, CA or FL. Property taxes depend on assessed valuation( based on the town's most recent townwide valuation) and vary from town to town so places like Woodstock, Burlington area, Stowe do have higher property taxes. Several places in the MRV in the $300,000 range with property taxes in the $2000/3000 range/yr and after a year if you make less than $90,000/year you get a rebate cutting your taxes by as much as 50%, depending on your income.

Bottomline, the more expensive the house, the more you pay. More due diligence and you will find towns with a lower town tax rate(the state part of the tax is the same in every town) and the property tax is much lower than the examples you have posted. A place with 10 acres will have alot higher taxes than a place on 1 acre.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2010, 06:02 AM
 
Location: The Woods
18,356 posts, read 26,481,472 times
Reputation: 11349
The taxes on a relative's cabin in the NEK with 10 acres is a little under $1,000. It's possible to find sort of affordable property taxes in VT, but most of the state does indeed have absurd taxes. NH property taxes are often even worse, believe it or not.

However, regarding the post above about VT not cutting services to lower taxes...that can't go on forever. The biggest part is the schools. Many schools refused to even cut when the legislature requested it. Shumlin said he will use some federal money to basically bail them out, but that is a temporary bandaid. They need to cut, and cut drastically...we can't have so many separate districts and so much wasteful spending. I saw a clip the other day from some school board meeting and one member was explaining why he voted for some massive spending...he was going on and on about how the school needed this and that....all stuff my school never had....and not needed at all (and I say that as an ex-teacher)...this is the problem...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2010, 10:10 AM
 
Location: Western views of Mansfield/Camels Hump!
2,062 posts, read 3,960,464 times
Reputation: 1265
Also, looking in towns like Woodstock or Stowe, taxes are going to be significantly higher than towns where there is no tourist/second home base....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2010, 12:45 PM
 
Location: Mammoth Lakes, CA
3,360 posts, read 8,386,514 times
Reputation: 8595
I am basing my statement that real estate prices has crashed in Vermont on the fact that home prices have fallen dramatically in the places I am looking at: southern Vermont, roughly from Brattleboro on up to Woodstock. Also Stratton Mountain.

In 2005, I came close to buying a second home in Stratton Mountain for $400,000. That exact same house is on the market now for $219,000. And home prices in Woodstock have fallen dramatically since 2004-05 as well.

It's just so sad that I love Vermont so much, but just refuse to pay property taxes up the yazoo.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2010, 12:51 PM
 
Location: Mammoth Lakes, CA
3,360 posts, read 8,386,514 times
Reputation: 8595
Here's an example of high property taxes I ran across this morning. Here's a home in Queechee for $499,000 and the yearly property taxes are... (gulp)... $13,740. MY GOD!

Real Estate Woodstock Vermont - Williamson Group - Woodstock VT Homes
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2010, 02:07 PM
 
Location: The Woods
18,356 posts, read 26,481,472 times
Reputation: 11349
Queechee Gorge is beautiful, but I couldn't be paid to live there...Woodstock, Queechee, Stowe...all tourist towns. Some of the touristy towns are nice (I like Weston, I couldn't stand Woodstock or Queechee) but you will have higher taxes there...and there are some touristy towns with high taxes even in the NEK...

I do agree with the fact that real estate has crashed in VT with few exceptions. I've seen many properties just sitting on the market, some for over 2 years, through multiple, drastic price reductions...but the prices aren't low enough yet to find a buyer. I know of areas where road and after road is full of properties for sale, nothing selling. The market was always a bit slower in the NEK but even in Central and Southern VT it's that way now.

If you're intent on Southern-Central Vermont, look in Rutland County outside of Rutland City...towns like Hubbardton, Tinmouth, Ira, Danby, Wallingford, and some others, will be a little more affordable than around Brattleboro...just stay away from "mcmansions" and "developments" featuring all sorts of restrictions, those will be where you'll get worse taxes, etc. And stay off the main highways. It's amazing sometimes how a crummy dirt road can make the real estate slightly less expensive...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Vermont
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top