City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 33.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
4401 38TH AVE N
St Petersburg, FL 33713
St Petersburg, FL 33713
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Ptec - St Petersburg School (3.2 miles): | 98 |
| Bay Vista Fundamental Elementary School (7.0 miles): | 73 |
| Westshore Elementary School (10.9 miles): | 60 |
| Highland Lakes Elementary School (19.0 miles): | 50 |
| Westgate Elementary School (1.3 miles): | 39 |
| Alfred Adler Elementary School: | 33 |
| Pinellas Central Elementary School (4.3 miles): | 31 |
| Dropout Prevention School (9.6 miles): | 21 |
| Richardson Montessori Academy School (19.3 miles): | 0 |
Alfred Adler Elementary School rating compared to average state and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| St Petersburg: | 45 |
| Alfred Adler Elementary School: | 33 |
1
Greg DeCosmo
Mar 9, 2011 @ 6:18 pm
This information is incorrect please e-mail our school in order to correct the information you posted
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 52
School number: 7201
School type: Elementary
District Name: PINELLAS
Principal: Greg Decosmo
Regular charter school.
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 10
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 53
Senate District: 16
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 68% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| ALFRED ADLER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 36% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 51% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 65% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 73% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 501 |
| State average from 3 schools: | 551 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: Pending
Grade in 2009: B
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 60% |
Minority Rate
Region: 5| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 49% |
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1088 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1083 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 502
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 912
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 909
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 257 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 256 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 127
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 201
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 198
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 92 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 93 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 79
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 80
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 720 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 715 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 329
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 40% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 617
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 616
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 688 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 685 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient: 94%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 301
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 36% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 592
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 593
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 159 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 158 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient: 76%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 72
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient: 18%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient: 53%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 107
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 94 (95%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 94
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 61% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 61% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 92% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 33% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 64% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 65% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10| ALFRED ADLER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 70% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 519 |
| State average from 4 schools: | 528 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| ALFRED ADLER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 99% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: B
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 67% |
Minority Rate
Region: 5| ALFRED ADLER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 81% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 59% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1014 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1006 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient: 92%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 491
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 44% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 872
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 867
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 202 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 198 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient: 89%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 83
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 158
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 156
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 74 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 72 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 704 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 702 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient: 93%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 351
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 39% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 620
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 620
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 634 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 631 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 38% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 556
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 555
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 149 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 150 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient: 82%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 74
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient: 14%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 108
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient: 61%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 100 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient: 76%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 91
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 82
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading: 46%Meeting High Standards in Math: 74%
Meeting High Standards in Writing: 88%
Meeting High Standards in Science: 35%
Making Reading Gains : 60%
Making Math Gains: 80%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading : 57%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 73%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns): 523
Percent Tested: 99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 58%
Minority Rate: 82%
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1061 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1053 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| ALFRED ADLER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 40% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 914
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 911
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 184 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 183 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 85
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 154
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 152
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 98 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 96 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 90
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 743 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 738 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient: 91%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 310
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 650
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 650
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 649 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 644 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 32% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 566
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 566
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 182 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 180 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient: 78%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 68
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient: 13%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 159
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 127
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient: 46%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 160
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 127
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 123 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 123 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient: 88%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 10% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 99
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 21% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 101
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading: 35%Meeting High Standards in Math: 62%
Meeting High Standards in Writing: 74%
Meeting High Standards in Science: 28%
Making Reading Gains: 47%
Making Math Gains: 63%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 49%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 56%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns: 414
Percent Tested: 98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 44%
Minority Rate: 81%
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1091 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1064 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 30% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 193 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 190 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| ALFRED ADLER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 100 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 99 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient: 87%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 94
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 94
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 775 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 752 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient: 78%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 383
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient: 25%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 739
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient: 51%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 713
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 501 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 487 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient: 78%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 224
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient: 21%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 474
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient: 50%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 460
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 223 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 215 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient: 47%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 101
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient: 5%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 204
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient: 35%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 195
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 111 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 111 (95%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient: 57%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient: 5%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient: 10%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading: 37%Meeting High Standards in Math: 65%
Meeting High Standards in Writing: 83%
Making Reading Gains: 56%
Making Math Gains: 74%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 58%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns: 373
Percent Tested: 98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 49%
Minority Rate: 81%
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1138 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1121 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 32% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 222 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 220 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient: 92%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 103
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient: 56%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 211
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient: 73%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 211
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 74 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient: 82%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 39
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient: 25%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 71
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient: 56%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 70
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 823 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 809 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient: 84%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 405
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient: 27%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 789
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient: 53%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 771
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 540 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 529 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient: 84%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 251
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient: 27%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 526
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient: 54%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 514
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 269 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 261 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient: 64%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 123
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient: 15%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 255
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient: 43%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 246
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 121 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 120 (96%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient: 64%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 58
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient: 8%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 119
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient: 16%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 116
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading: 30%Meeting High Standards in Math: 58%
Meeting High Standards in Writing: 81%
Making Reading Gains: 45%
Making Math Gains: 68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 51%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns: 333
Percent Tested: 98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 49%
Minority Rate: 81%
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1949 |
| State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 317 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 12% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 47% |
| State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 11 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1992 |
| State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 312 |
| State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing
| Here: | 63% |
| State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 12% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| ALFRED ADLER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 40% |
| State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 15 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 296 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 5% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 1% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1959 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 312 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 68% |
| State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2018 |
| State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 332 |
| State average: | 326 |
Percent Passing
| Here: | 86% |
| State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 74% |
| State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1959 |
| State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%| Here: | 319 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1967 |
| State average: | 1921 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 57%| Here: | 307 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%| ALFRED ADLER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 288 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1974 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%| Here: | 317 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2019 |
| State average: | 1972 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 85%| Here: | 332 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 508
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Unscore - Combined: 1| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 81%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1910 |
| State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%| Here: | 310 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1947 |
| State average: | 1935 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 54%| Here: | 304 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%| Here: | 292 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| ALFRED ADLER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1944 |
| State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%| Here: | 308 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1992 |
| State average: | 1984 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 80%| Here: | 325 |
| State average: | 323 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 555 |
| State average: | 273 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 695 |
| State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 63 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| ALFRED ADLER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 11 |
| State average: | 11 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 11 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
| ALFRED ADLER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 494 |
| State average: | 237 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 713 |
| State average from 2096 schools: | 709 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 70 |
| State average: | 65 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 487
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 19%| Here: | 304 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 54%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 84%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1859 |
| State average from 612 schools: | 1849 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%| Here: | 300 |
| State average: | 298 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1865 |
| State average: | 1837 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 70| Here: | 1795 |
| State average: | 1779 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| ALFRED ADLER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1852 |
| State average from 573 schools: | 1879 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 43%| Here: | 286 |
| State average: | 291 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 11
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1884 |
| State average: | 1873 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -13| Here: | 1897 |
| State average: | 1876 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%| Here: | 287 |
| State average: | 295 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 7
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1894 |
| State average from 613 schools: | 1884 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%| Here: | 293 |
| State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1899 |
| State average: | 1869 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 44| Here: | 1855 |
| State average: | 1821 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1933 |
| State average from 581 schools: | 1950 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 71%| Here: | 311 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1941 |
| State average: | 1939 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
| Here: | 1940 |
| State average: | 1901 |
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 561
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 57| Here: | 689 |
| State average from 597 schools: | 696 |
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 552
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 47| ALFRED ADLER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 689 |
| State average from 575 schools: | 695 |
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 561
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 66| Here: | 705 |
| State average from 597 schools: | 708 |
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 8
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 552
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 54| Here: | 705 |
| State average from 575 schools: | 710 |
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 538
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 35%| Here: | 276 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 37%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 5%| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 68%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 53%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.