Carver Middle School in Orlando, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 12.

4500 W COLUMBIA ST
Orlando, FL 32811

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Lake Eola Charter School (3.8 miles):

98
Millennium Middle School (18.0 miles):

68
Silver Star Center School (4.1 miles):

59
Lakeview Middle School (10.5 miles):

52
Glenridge Middle School (7.1 miles):

39
Meadow Woods Middle School (12.0 miles):

23
Carver Middle School:

12
Excel School (3.1 miles):

9
New Beginnings Education Complex School (16.8 miles):

0
Carver Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Orange County:

44
Orlando:

42
Carver Middle School:

12

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (407) 296-5110 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 48
School number: 5871
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: ORANGE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (407) 296-6407
Principal: Wayne Green
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status:
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 3
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 39
Senate District: 19

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

49%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

45%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

86%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
CARVER MIDDLE:

17%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
CARVER MIDDLE:

62%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
CARVER MIDDLE:

63%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

64%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
CARVER MIDDLE:

454
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: C

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 119999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

93%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 3

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 783 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 781 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 225
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 711
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 687

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 708
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 684
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 709 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 707 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 203
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
CARVER MIDDLE:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 642
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 619

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 639
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 617
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 728 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 726 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 202
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 662
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 641

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 659
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 638
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 124 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 124 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 109
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 108

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 109
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 156 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 156 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
CARVER MIDDLE:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 140
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 137

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 141
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

43%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

42%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

95%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

13%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
CARVER MIDDLE:

65%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
CARVER MIDDLE:

81%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
CARVER MIDDLE:

473
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

89%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

98%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 792 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 790 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 217
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 692
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 664

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 688
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 658
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 714 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 712 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 197
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 622
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 596

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 618
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 590
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 703 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 699 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 182
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 618
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 595

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 613
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 588
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 112 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 114 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 98
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 98
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 99
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 167 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 166 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 48
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 151
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 146

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
CARVER MIDDLE:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 150
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 142
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

40%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

39%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

96%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

19%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

61%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
CARVER MIDDLE:

71%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

69%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

454
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

86%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

98%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 763 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 763 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 207
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 679
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 640

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 674
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 633
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 691 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 691 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 191
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 612
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 580

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
CARVER MIDDLE:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 607
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 574
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 657 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 657 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 165
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 587
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 551

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 582
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 545
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 77 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 77 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 170 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 170 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 150
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 142

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 146
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 136
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

40%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

39%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

96%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
CARVER MIDDLE:

13%
State average from 538 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

53%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
CARVER MIDDLE:

63%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

58%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

422
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

87%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

98%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 903 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 903 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 295
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 815
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 813
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 800 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 800 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 263
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 724
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
CARVER MIDDLE:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 722
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 68 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 68 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 788 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 788 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 246
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 710
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 708
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 108 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 108 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
CARVER MIDDLE:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 185 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 184 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 63
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 173
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 172
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

42%
State average from 526 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
CARVER MIDDLE:

42%
State average from 526 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
CARVER MIDDLE:

94%
State average from 526 schools:

89%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 526 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 526 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

64%
State average from 526 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

371
State average from 526 schools:

425
Percent Tested
Here:

97%
State average from 526 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

87%
State average from 525 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

98%
State average from 526 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 939 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 933 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 247
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 825
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 821
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 854 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 849 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 224
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 749
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 745
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (98%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 52

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 826 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 820 (96%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 198
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
CARVER MIDDLE:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 720
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
CARVER MIDDLE:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 717
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 81 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 81 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 77

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 78
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 189 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 185 (95%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 38
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 149
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 146
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

38%
State average from 505 schools:

59%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

41%
State average from 505 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

76%
State average from 506 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 505 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
CARVER MIDDLE:

69%
State average from 505 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

64%
State average from 505 schools:

66%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

350
State average from 506 schools:

397
Percent Tested
Here:

97%
State average from 506 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

85%
State average from 506 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

97%
State average from 506 schools:

50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1587
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

26%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
CARVER MIDDLE:

13%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

47%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1698
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

25%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

48%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1745
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

280
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

38%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

35%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
CARVER MIDDLE:

27%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CARVER MIDDLE:

265
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

55%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

13%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

14%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

7
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CARVER MIDDLE:

1568
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CARVER MIDDLE:

285
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

41%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
CARVER MIDDLE:

7%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

35%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
CARVER MIDDLE:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CARVER MIDDLE:

1677
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

37%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
CARVER MIDDLE:

2%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

36%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1792
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

30%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

37%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
CARVER MIDDLE:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1552
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1680
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1752
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

282
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

266
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CARVER MIDDLE:

1543
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

280
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1682
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

280
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CARVER MIDDLE:

1782
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 250
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 92%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1500
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1628
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1762
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CARVER MIDDLE:

284
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1473
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

263
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1712
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1807
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
CARVER MIDDLE:

279
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

649
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

43
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
CARVER MIDDLE:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
CARVER MIDDLE:

258
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

662
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
CARVER MIDDLE:

49
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
CARVER MIDDLE:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

227
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

676
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

54
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
CARVER MIDDLE:

12
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
CARVER MIDDLE:

11
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
CARVER MIDDLE:

9
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 230
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

279
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 36%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1507
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

274
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1507
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1443
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 64

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1661
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
CARVER MIDDLE:

1680
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1587
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 93

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1730
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1741
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1649
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 93

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

256
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1497
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

269
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1506
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
CARVER MIDDLE:

1510
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1693
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CARVER MIDDLE:

282
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1707
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1548
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 159

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1763
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1773
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1704
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 68

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 313
Mean Scale Score
Here:

655
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 48
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 259
Mean Scale Score
Here:

663
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 50
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 315
Mean Scale Score
Here:

673
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 50
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 314
Mean Scale Score
Here:

649
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 45
Number Sense (max 10): 5
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 262
Mean Scale Score
Here:

672
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 58
Number Sense (max 9): 4
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 316
Mean Scale Score
Here:

683
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 57
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 322
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

268
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 33%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 88%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 76%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Orlando, FL
  5. Carver Middle School in Orlando, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.