Meadow Woods Middle School in Orlando, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 23.

1800 RHODE ISLAND WOOD
Orlando, FL 32824

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Lake Eola Charter School (12.1 miles):

98
Ae Lakeside School (9.7 miles):

66
Chain Of Lakes Middle School (12.8 miles):

57
Blankner School (10.0 miles):

46
Southwest Middle School (11.3 miles):

33
Meadow Woods Middle School:

23
Walker Middle School (6.4 miles):

16
Kissimmee Charter Academy School (3.5 miles):

9
Meadow Woods Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Orange County:

44
Orlando:

42
Meadow Woods Middle School:

23

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (407) 850-5180 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 48
School number: 1381
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: ORANGE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (407) 850-5190
Principal: Isom Rivers Jr.
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 8
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 49
Senate District: 19

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

56%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

81%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

39%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

69%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

75%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

520
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: B

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

81%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

91%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 3

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 177 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 177 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 57
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 169
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 152

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 169
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 152
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 99 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 99 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 90

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 90
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 151 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 151 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 143
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 127

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 143
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 127
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 177 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 177 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 57
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 169
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 152

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 169
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 152
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

60%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

55%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

89%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

34%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

69%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

65%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

494
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

74%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

90%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 186 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 186 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 61
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 174
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 162
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 174
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 161
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 111 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 111 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 151 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 151 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 140
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 128

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 140
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 128
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 186 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 186 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 61
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 174
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 162
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 174
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 161
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

61%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

57%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

89%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

30%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

70%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

67%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

505
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

73%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

89%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 180 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 180 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 61
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 165
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 151
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 166
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 151
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 101 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 101 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 94
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 94
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 86
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 147 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 147 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 53
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 137
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 127

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 138
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 127
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 180 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 180 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 61
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 165
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 151
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 166
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 151
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

59%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

57%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

87%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

36%
State average from 538 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

61%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

70%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

69%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

507
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

67%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

89%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1362 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1361 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 454
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1293
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1292
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 144 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 143 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 53
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 141
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 140
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 153 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 153 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 141
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 141
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 959 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 959 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 319
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 907
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 907
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 916 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 917 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 308
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 864
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 865
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 556 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 557 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 183
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 531
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 532
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 145 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 145 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 53
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 136
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 138
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

64%
State average from 526 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

60%
State average from 526 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

84%
State average from 526 schools:

89%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 526 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 526 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

77%
State average from 526 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

426
State average from 526 schools:

425
Percent Tested
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 526 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

59%
State average from 525 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

82%
State average from 526 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1883 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1883 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 581
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1812
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1811
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 338 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 338 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 111

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 330
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 330
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 242 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 242 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 76

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 228
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 227
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1164 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1164 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 345

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1118
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1118
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 91 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 91 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 30

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 90

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 90
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1121 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1122 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 327

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1066
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1065
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 595 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 595 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 186

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 572
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 571
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 223 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 222 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 76

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 214
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 214
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

56%
State average from 505 schools:

59%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

57%
State average from 505 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

78%
State average from 506 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 505 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 505 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

77%
State average from 505 schools:

66%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

405
State average from 506 schools:

397
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 506 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

60%
State average from 506 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

80%
State average from 506 schools:

50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1188
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

282
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

28%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

17%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

54%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1459
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

299
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

25%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

27%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

58%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1472
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

31%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

9%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

41%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

1
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1101
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

201
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

92%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

4%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

4%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

6
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

3
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1284
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

217
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

83%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

10%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

8%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

8%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

9
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1458
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

220
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

85%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

12%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

3%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

3%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

8
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1467
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

228
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

87%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

4%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

9%
State average:

26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

9%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

5
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

274
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

42%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

44%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

7%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

14%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

208
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

80%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

6%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

5
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

5
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

3
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

215
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

92%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

3
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1300
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

21%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

42%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

60%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1506
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

19%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

60%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1589
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

20%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

39%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

6%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

41%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1168
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

193
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

88%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

6%
State average:

29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

6%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

1
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

3
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1354
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

198
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

88%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

5%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

8%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

2
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1570
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

238
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

74%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

9%
State average:

38%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

9%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1626
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

214
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

74%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

1
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1645
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

241
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

18%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

79%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

7%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

7%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1187
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1469
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 02%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 04
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 09
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1537
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1071
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

196
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 86%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1334
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

226
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1432
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

215
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 89%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1466
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

228
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 91%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

194
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 94%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1331
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

307
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1471
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1561
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1184
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

196
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 88%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 1
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1416
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

214
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 83%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1569
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

238
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 83%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1670
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

227
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1550
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

217
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 92%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 1
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 1
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 110
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 32
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 31%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 33
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

2
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 6
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 15%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1210
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

285
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1390
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1421
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

269
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1127
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

206
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1295
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

219
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1508
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

231
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 87%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1453
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

226
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 88%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

280
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

206
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 89%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

205
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 96%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 2
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1328
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

306
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1427
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1576
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1136
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

185
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 92%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1506
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

236
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 86%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1572
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

238
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 74%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1635
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

217
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1660
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

244
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 86%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 1

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

119
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

612
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

42
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

103
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

636
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

55
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

93
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

648
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

55
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

36
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

608
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

12
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

8
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

29
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

621
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

16
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

3
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

39
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

630
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

15
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

4
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

51
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

641
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

15
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

4
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

3
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

21
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

629
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

6
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

5
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

7
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

3
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 100
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

277
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 46%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 69%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 41
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

183
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 93%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 7%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 6
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 41%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 21
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

186
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 86%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 14%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 2
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 2
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 6
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 29%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1610
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1642
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1558
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 84

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1733
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1762
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1678
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 84

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1819
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1838
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1730
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 108

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1593
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1619
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1627
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -8

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1770
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1787
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1632
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 155

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1839
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1859
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1761
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 99

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 457
Mean Scale Score
Here:

664
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 57
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 429
Mean Scale Score
Here:

673
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 59
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 469
Mean Scale Score
Here:

685
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 62
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 454
Mean Scale Score
Here:

659
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 55
Number Sense (max 10): 5
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 428
Mean Scale Score
Here:

682
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 67
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 468
Mean Scale Score
MEADOW WOODS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

695
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 67
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 471
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

270
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 32%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 80%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 65%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Orlando, FL
  5. Meadow Woods Middle School in Orlando, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.