Citrus County Renaissance Center School in Inverness, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 42.

221 S MONTGOMERY AVE
Inverness, FL 34452

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Withlachoochee Technical Insti School (0.2 miles):

96
Sumter Alternative School (18.9 miles):

63
Wildwood Middle School (18.7 miles):

48
Citrus County Renaissance Center School:

42
Citrus High School (0.5 miles):

39
Wildwood High School (19.0 miles):

32
Inverness Middle School (1.2 miles):

26
Excel Alternatives North School (19.2 miles):

21
West Street School (17.6 miles):

0
Citrus County Renaissance Center School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Citrus County:

51
Inverness:

45
Citrus County Renaissance Center:

42

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (352) 637-3636 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 9
School number: 321
School type: Senior High
District Name: CITRUS
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (352) 637-3538
Principal: David Cook
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 5
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 43
Senate District: 3

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

85%
State average from 133 schools:

66%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

89%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 133 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

73%
State average from 133 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 133 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
CITRUS COUNTY RENAISSANCE CENTER:

79%
State average from 132 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

64%
State average from 133 schools:

57%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

78%
State average from 133 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

625
State average from 133 schools:

522
Percent Tested
CITRUS COUNTY RENAISSANCE CENTER:

100%
State average from 132 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 119999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

6%
State average from 137 schools:

57%
Minority Rate
Here:

4%
State average from 137 schools:

53%
Region: 2

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 975 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 975 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 327
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 956
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 905

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 957
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 905
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 843 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 843 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 286
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
CITRUS COUNTY RENAISSANCE CENTER:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 831
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 786

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 832
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 786
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 115 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 115 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 108

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

85%
State average from 141 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

86%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

94%
State average from 139 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

71%
State average from 133 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 133 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 136 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 133 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 133 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

617
State average from 133 schools:

540
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 134 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

4%
State average from 132 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

15%
State average from 139 schools:

52%
Region: 2


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (90%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (89%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (89%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (90%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
CITRUS COUNTY RENAISSANCE CENTER:

85%
State average from 124 schools:

66%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

86%
State average from 124 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

96%
State average from 125 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

69%
State average from 122 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 122 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 122 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

58%
State average from 122 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

69%
State average from 122 schools:

70%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

603
State average from 122 schools:

535
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 124 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

4%
State average from 126 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

14%
State average from 125 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (78%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (78%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (77%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (78%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (79%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (82%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (78%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (78%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

7%
State average from 63 schools:

49%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

4%
State average from 63 schools:

55%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

85%
State average from 63 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

50%
State average from 63 schools:

37%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

17%
State average from 63 schools:

53%
Making Math Gains
Here:

42%
State average from 63 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
CITRUS COUNTY RENAISSANCE CENTER:

26%
State average from 63 schools:

55%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

47%
State average from 63 schools:

63%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

278
State average from 63 schools:

461
Percent Tested
Here:

88%
State average from 63 schools:

97%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: NO

Grade in 2007: P

Grade in 2006: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

65%
State average from 63 schools:

55%
Minority Rate
Here:

14%
State average from 63 schools:

55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 116 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 119 (90%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
CITRUS COUNTY RENAISSANCE CENTER:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

5%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

8%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 99 (87%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 102 (89%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
CITRUS COUNTY RENAISSANCE CENTER:

5%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 78 (89%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (91%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28 (85%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29 (88%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

14%
State average from 62 schools:

49%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

30%
State average from 62 schools:

55%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

86%
State average from 62 schools:

82%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

33%
State average from 62 schools:

57%
Making Math Gains
Here:

53%
State average from 62 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

37%
State average from 62 schools:

62%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

253
State average from 62 schools:

371
Percent Tested
CITRUS COUNTY RENAISSANCE CENTER:

92%
State average from 62 schools:

97%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: NO

Grade in 2006: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

71%
State average from 63 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

15%
State average from 63 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 74 (91%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 46
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 48
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (90%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 39
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
CITRUS COUNTY RENAISSANCE CENTER:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 41
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (89%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (91%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 34
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 36
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

5
State average:

103

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
CITRUS COUNTY RENAISSANCE CENTER:

4
State average:

97

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

3
State average:

101

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

7
State average:

190

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

4
State average:

201

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

2
State average:

192

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
CITRUS COUNTY RENAISSANCE CENTER:

7
State average:

273

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

4
State average:

237

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 3

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 1

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1467
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

252
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1448
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1521
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -74

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1528
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

235
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 76%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 74%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1534
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1581
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -47

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1592
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

251
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 73%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1598
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
CITRUS COUNTY RENAISSANCE CENTER:

1739
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -142

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
CITRUS COUNTY RENAISSANCE CENTER:

1495
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

220
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 93%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 47%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1474
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1504
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -30

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

228
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1533
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CITRUS COUNTY RENAISSANCE CENTER:

243
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1550
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1452
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 99

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1689
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CITRUS COUNTY RENAISSANCE CENTER:

268
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 74%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1710
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
CITRUS COUNTY RENAISSANCE CENTER:

1643
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 67

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1758
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

253
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 75%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1740
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1743
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -2

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
CITRUS COUNTY RENAISSANCE CENTER:

1785
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 63%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1802
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1745
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 58

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 26
Mean Scale Score
Here:

644
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 33
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 12): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 5
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 37
Mean Scale Score
Here:

646
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 26
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 7
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 10): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 10
Critical Analysis (max 14): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 41
Mean Scale Score
Here:

650
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 23
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 7
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 10): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 10
Critical Analysis (max 14): 6
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 13
Mean Scale Score
Here:

649
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 15
Literary (max 18): 8
Informational (max 18): 7
Functional (max 18): 8
Initial Understanding (max 10): 4
Interpretation (max 20): 9
Critical Analysis (max 14): 6
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 26
Mean Scale Score
Here:

650
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 38
Number Sense (max 9): 3
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 37
Mean Scale Score
Here:

671
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 43
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 41
Mean Scale Score
Here:

677
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 39
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 13
Mean Scale Score
Here:

677
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 21
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 3
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 31
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

192
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 81%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 10%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 7
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

2
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 32%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 19%

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 14
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

205
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 7%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

2
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 29%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 21%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Inverness, FL
  5. Citrus County Renaissance Center School in Inverness, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.