City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 48.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Withlachoochee Technical Insti School (18.7 miles): | 96 |
| Sumter Alternative School (8.6 miles): | 63 |
| Wildwood Middle School: | 48 |
| Citrus County Renaissance Center School (18.7 miles): | 42 |
| Milestones Community Of Lake County, Inc. School (15.5 miles): | 33 |
| South Sumter Middle School (17.0 miles): | 27 |
| Milestones Community Of Lake County, Inc. School (15.5 miles): | 24 |
| Life Stream Academy School (8.8 miles): | 0 |
Wildwood Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Sumter County: | 47 |
| Wildwood: | 34 |
| Wildwood Middle School: | 48 |
1
Carlota Tyson
Dec 9, 2017 @ 3:15 pm
What year was this building built? What year was it first available to students?
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 60
School number: 82
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: SUMTER
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (352) 748-7639
Principal: Charles Sullivan
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 5
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 42
Senate District: 20
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 612 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 612 schools: | 51% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 64% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 612 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 555 |
| State average from 613 schools: | 545 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 30% |
| State average from 614 schools: | 56% |
Minority Rate
Region: 4| Here: | 37% |
| State average from 614 schools: | 49% |
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 479 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 480 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 140
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 454
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 455
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 286 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 287 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 86
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 270
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 271
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 123 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 123 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 118
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 118
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 158 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 159 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 144
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 145
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 82
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 82
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 92% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 49% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 533 |
| State average from 613 schools: | 553 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 52% |
Minority Rate
Region: 4| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 48% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 309 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 309 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 98
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 285
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 286
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 163 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 51
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 147
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 148
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 119 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 119 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 112
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 42% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 112
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 225 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 225 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 205
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 206
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 22% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 603 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 603 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 97% |
| State average from 603 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 69% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 65% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 564 |
| State average from 602 schools: | 543 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 604 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 71% |
| State average from 605 schools: | 49% |
Minority Rate
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 49% |
| State average from 605 schools: | 48% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 330 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 329 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 102
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 299
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 297
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 170 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 169 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 156
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 66% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 155
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 130 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 130 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 120
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 232 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 231 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 208
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 206
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 21% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 16% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 56% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 91% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 37% |
| State average from 538 schools: | 44% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 61% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
| Here: | 476 |
| State average from 539 schools: | 523 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 541 schools: | 49% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 542 schools: | 53% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 372 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 370 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 184 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 183 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 160 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 160 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 32% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 33% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 259 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 257 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 42% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 22% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 19% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 63% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 89% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 72% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 395 |
| State average from 526 schools: | 425 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 99% |
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 525 schools: | 50% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 52% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 271 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 271 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 43% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 123 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 123 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 95% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 129 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 129 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 27% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 33% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 198 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 198 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 86% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 36% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (97%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 26% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 21% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 44% |
| State average from 505 schools: | 59% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 505 schools: | 60% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 72% |
| State average from 506 schools: | 83% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 505 schools: | 61% |
Making Math Gains
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 73% |
| State average from 505 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 505 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 379 |
| State average from 506 schools: | 397 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 506 schools: | 99% |
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 506 schools: | 51% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 506 schools: | 50% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1541 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 340 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 7% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 8% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 26% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 43% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 85% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 19 |
| State average: | 17 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1666 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 334 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 79% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 21 |
| State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1709 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 321 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 76% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 3 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 10 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1860 |
| State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 338 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 81% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1948 |
| State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 344 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 84% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 18 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2028 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 340 |
| State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 41% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 3% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 80% |
| State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 19 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 332 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 10% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 4% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 54% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 355 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 47% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 2% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 73% |
| State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 10 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1511 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 346 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 84% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1572 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 327 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 8% |
| State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 21% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 68% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1679 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 335 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 30% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 57% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1767 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 332 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 65% |
| State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1909 |
| State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 336 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 6% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 14% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 42% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 80% |
| State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2002 |
| State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 347 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 2% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 10% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 89% |
| State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 5 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1442 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%| Here: | 323 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1655 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 08%| Here: | 332 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1716 |
| State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%| Here: | 322 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1656 |
| State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%| Here: | 301 |
| State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1748 |
| State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%| Here: | 306 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1869 |
| State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%| Here: | 306 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| Here: | 325 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%| Here: | 301 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1445 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%| Here: | 331 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1558 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| Here: | 323 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1678 |
| State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%| Here: | 335 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1602 |
| State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 293 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1789 |
| State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| Here: | 306 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1854 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%| Here: | 310 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 170
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Unscore - Combined: 1| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 105
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%| Here: | 5 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 11%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 11%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 94%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1382 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%| Here: | 313 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1615 |
| State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| Here: | 325 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1640 |
| State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 308 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1658 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%| Here: | 302 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1758 |
| State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 307 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1884 |
| State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%| Here: | 310 |
| State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 305 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%| Here: | 309 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1359 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%| Here: | 313 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1516 |
| State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| Here: | 314 |
| State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1662 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%| Here: | 332 |
| State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1622 |
| State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%| Here: | 298 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1783 |
| State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%| Here: | 305 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1900 |
| State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%| Here: | 321 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 178 |
| State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 634 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 62 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 157 |
| State average: | 97 |
Mean Scale Score
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 656 |
| State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 73 |
| State average: | 69 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 153 |
| State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 672 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 76 |
| State average: | 71 |
Literary (max 18)
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 107 |
| State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 651 |
| State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 44 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 11 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 104 |
| State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 671 |
| State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 57 |
| State average: | 66 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 11 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 12 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 101 |
| State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 682 |
| State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 59 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 12 |
| State average: | 12 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 10 |
Strategies (max 10)
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 155
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 19%| Here: | 288 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 46%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 61%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 108
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 14%| Here: | 315 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 60%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 12%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 91%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1577 |
| State average from 878 schools: | 1661 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%| Here: | 287 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1580 |
| State average: | 1663 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 18| Here: | 1562 |
| State average: | 1592 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1736 |
| State average from 808 schools: | 1746 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%| Here: | 303 |
| State average: | 305 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1750 |
| State average: | 1743 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 23| Here: | 1727 |
| State average: | 1668 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1785 |
| State average from 819 schools: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%| Here: | 289 |
| State average: | 294 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1791 |
| State average: | 1807 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 108| Here: | 1682 |
| State average: | 1738 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%| Here: | 292 |
| State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1536 |
| State average from 873 schools: | 1641 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%| Here: | 278 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1546 |
| State average: | 1645 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -30| Here: | 1576 |
| State average: | 1620 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1821 |
| State average from 804 schools: | 1777 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%| Here: | 314 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1829 |
| State average: | 1774 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 143| Here: | 1686 |
| State average: | 1645 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1828 |
| State average from 815 schools: | 1851 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%| Here: | 303 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1828 |
| State average: | 1845 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 83| Here: | 1746 |
| State average: | 1755 |
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 116
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 55| Here: | 661 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 671 |
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 116
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 60| Here: | 673 |
| State average from 796 schools: | 675 |
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 112
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 52| Here: | 674 |
| State average from 810 schools: | 685 |
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 117
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 53| Here: | 657 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 669 |
Number Sense (max 10): 5
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 116
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 73| WILDWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 688 |
| State average from 796 schools: | 685 |
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 112
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 63| Here: | 691 |
| State average from 810 schools: | 698 |
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 122
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 25%| Here: | 298 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 53%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 87%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.