City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 1.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Durbin Creek Elementary School (8.5 miles): | 84 |
| Wards Creek Elementary School (9.7 miles): | 78 |
| S. Bryan Jennings Elementary School (13.5 miles): | 67 |
| Tynes Elementary School (12.9 miles): | 61 |
| Mcrae Elementary School (18.4 miles): | 56 |
| Bank Of America Learning Academy School (16.1 miles): | 42 |
| Sadie T. Tillis Elementary School (16.5 miles): | 36 |
| Clay County Superintendent's Office School: | 1 |
Clay County Superintendent's Office School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Clay County: | 54 |
| Green Cove Springs: | 45 |
| This School: | 1 |
1
Carol Laub
Oct 4, 2011 @ 8:08 am
You have a principal at Keystone Heights Elementary, who is a very rude person I was in there this AM and there was a little boy I knew I made a comment he lived near me and he was something elese, the answer she gave me in front of a lot of people was Isn,t that calling the kettle black, I sure did not appreciate this comment.I feel she should not be there, because of her attitude, this is not the firs time.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 10
School number: 9001
School type: Other
District Name: CLAY
Grade range: UNASSIGNED
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (904) 284-6525
Principal: David Owens
The main educational program offered at the school: Superintendent's Office
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 3
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 20
Senate District: 7
School Web Address: http://www.clay.k12.fl.us/
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 8% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 33% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (90%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 42% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 37% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (91%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (88%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (81%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (79%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 38% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (84%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (82%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24 (77%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23 (76%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 56 (84%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (81%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1733 |
| State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%| Here: | 277 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1821 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%| Here: | 272 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 1
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 17
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Unscore - Combined: 6| Here: | 3 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 53%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1680 |
| State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%| Here: | 267 |
| State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1858 |
| State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%| Here: | 300 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1734 |
| State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%| Here: | 279 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1849 |
| State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%| Here: | 280 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 103 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 97 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 622 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR
| CLAY COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE: | 30 |
| State average: | 71 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| CLAY COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE: | 8 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| CLAY COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE: | 9 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
| CLAY COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE: | 8 |
| State average: | 190 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 1 |
| State average: | 201 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 192 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 273 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 1 |
| State average: | 237 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 3
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 12
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 58%| Here: | 217 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 42%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 8%| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 50%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 11
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 45%| Here: | 259 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 18%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 27%| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 55%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.