Corporate Academy North School in Miami, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 1.

5120 NW 24 AVE
Miami, FL 33142

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Mast Academy School (7.3 miles):

94
Somerset Arts Conservatory School (17.8 miles):

71
Mater Academy Charter High School (7.9 miles):

51
Thompson Academy School (12.3 miles):

33
South Miami Senior High School (8.2 miles):

20
School For Applied Technology (0.0 miles):

7
International Of Broward School (14.9 miles):

2
Corporate Academy North School:

1
Corporate Academy North School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Miami-Dade County:

45
Miami:

44
Corporate Academy North School:

1

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (305) 634-4650 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 8161
School type: Senior High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 637-1693
Principal: Doylene N Tarver
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Year 3 in Need of Improvement
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 17
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 109
Senate District: 39
School Web Address: http://can.dadeschools.net/

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

7%
State average from 443 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

18%
State average from 440 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
CORPORATE ACADEMY NORTH:

57%
State average from 443 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

33%
State average from 443 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

23%
State average from 441 schools:

59%
Making Math Gains
Here:

61%
State average from 442 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

23%
State average from 442 schools:

56%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

60%
State average from 441 schools:

66%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

282
State average from 441 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 448 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: F

Grade in 2007: P

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

80%
State average from 446 schools:

46%
Minority Rate
Here:

100%
State average from 451 schools:

45%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
CORPORATE ACADEMY NORTH:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 56 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
CORPORATE ACADEMY NORTH:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
CORPORATE ACADEMY NORTH:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 68 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

3%
State average from 370 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

17%
State average from 370 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
CORPORATE ACADEMY NORTH:

64%
State average from 370 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

30%
State average from 370 schools:

41%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

18%
State average from 370 schools:

52%
Making Math Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 370 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

17%
State average from 370 schools:

49%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

67%
State average from 370 schools:

67%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

275
State average from 370 schools:

482
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 370 schools:

97%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: P

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

65%
State average from 372 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
CORPORATE ACADEMY NORTH:

100%
State average from 372 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

4%
State average from 360 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

9%
State average from 361 schools:

68%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

51%
State average from 361 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

38%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Making Math Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 361 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

42%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

207
State average from 361 schools:

374
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 361 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: NO

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

64%
State average from 362 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

98%
State average from 362 schools:

47%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 40
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 46
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 44
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 35
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 39
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
CORPORATE ACADEMY NORTH:

8%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 38
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

5%
State average from 348 schools:

42%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

13%
State average from 348 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

75%
State average from 348 schools:

84%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

32%
State average from 348 schools:

51%
Making Math Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 348 schools:

73%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

37%
State average from 348 schools:

53%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

235
State average from 348 schools:

371
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 348 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: No%

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
CORPORATE ACADEMY NORTH:

67%
State average from 347 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

95%
State average from 348 schools:

45%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1613
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

255
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

77%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

7
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1740
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

266
State average:

302
Percent Passing
CORPORATE ACADEMY NORTH:

20%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

75%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
CORPORATE ACADEMY NORTH:

25%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

268
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

65%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

32%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

3%
State average:

30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
CORPORATE ACADEMY NORTH:

3%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1758
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

253
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

77%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

15%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
CORPORATE ACADEMY NORTH:

15%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1914
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CORPORATE ACADEMY NORTH:

306
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

65%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

40%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

15%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
CORPORATE ACADEMY NORTH:

55%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CORPORATE ACADEMY NORTH:

1700
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CORPORATE ACADEMY NORTH:

271
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 76%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1611
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

242
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 92%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CORPORATE ACADEMY NORTH:

223
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 93%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1724
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

243
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 1
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1819
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CORPORATE ACADEMY NORTH:

283
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 45
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 53%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1660
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

264
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1594
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

239
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 93%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

249
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 2%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CORPORATE ACADEMY NORTH:

1783
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

261
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1821
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

28
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

663
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

32
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
CORPORATE ACADEMY NORTH:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
CORPORATE ACADEMY NORTH:

8
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
CORPORATE ACADEMY NORTH:

47
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
CORPORATE ACADEMY NORTH:

684
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
CORPORATE ACADEMY NORTH:

42
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 45
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

238
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 9%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 6
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 51%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
CORPORATE ACADEMY NORTH:

1658
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

263
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 60%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1650
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1612
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 38

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1644
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

248
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 82%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 9
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1657
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1654
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 3

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

239
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1788
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

262
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 60%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1798
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1698
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 100

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1824
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 68%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1863
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1819
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 44

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 20
Mean Scale Score
Here:

658
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 27
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 14): 7
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 50
Mean Scale Score
CORPORATE ACADEMY NORTH:

670
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 29
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 20
Mean Scale Score
Here:

684
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 47
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 50
Mean Scale Score
Here:

686
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 32
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 48
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
CORPORATE ACADEMY NORTH:

249
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 13%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 67%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 46%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Miami, FL
  5. Corporate Academy North School in Miami, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.