City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
61.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Dr. Carlos J. Finlay Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida: | 45 |
Miami-Dade County: | 45 |
Miami: | 44 |
Dr. Carlos J. Finlay Elementary: | 61 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (305) 552-7122 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 5061
School type: Elementary
District Name: DADE
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 480-7652
Principal: Cecilia C Sanchez
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Year 1 in Need of Improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 25
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 119
Senate District: 38
School Web Address: http://cjfinlay.dadeschools.net/
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 90% |
State average from 963 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in MathDR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 87% |
State average from 963 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 93% |
State average from 963 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 60% |
State average from 962 schools: | 53% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 77% |
State average from 963 schools: | 64% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 77% |
State average from 963 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 72% |
State average from 963 schools: | 58% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 76% |
State average from 963 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 632 |
State average from 963 schools: | 543 |
Percent TestedDR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 100% |
State average from 963 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: N
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateDR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 80% |
State average from 963 schools: | 58% |
Minority RateDR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 97% |
State average from 963 schools: | 47% |
Region: 5
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 297 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 297 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 104
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 82% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 281
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 281
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 81% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 281
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 281
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 283 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 283 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 98
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 81% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 268
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 268
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 80% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 268
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 268
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 233 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 233 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 86
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 79% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 219
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 219
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 78% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 219
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 219
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 122 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 122 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 78% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 111
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 111
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 82% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 111
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 111
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 56 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 56 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 57% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingDR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 81% |
State average from 959 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 78% |
State average from 959 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 90% |
State average from 959 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 59% |
State average from 959 schools: | 52% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 73% |
State average from 959 schools: | 67% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 57% |
State average from 959 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 65% |
State average from 959 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 55% |
State average from 959 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 558 |
State average from 959 schools: | 560 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 959 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: N
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 78% |
State average from 959 schools: | 54% |
Minority RateHere: | 97% |
State average from 959 schools: | 46% |
Region: 5
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 337 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 337 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 103
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 74% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 314
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 312
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 75% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 314
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 312
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 320 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 320 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 98
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 73% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 297
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 295
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 73% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 297
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 295
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 259 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 259 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 75
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 72% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 238
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 236
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 72% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 238
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 236
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 132 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 132 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 64% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 116
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 115
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 73% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 116
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 115
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 48% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientDR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 76% |
State average from 954 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 77% |
State average from 954 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 91% |
State average from 954 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceDR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 51% |
State average from 954 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 71% |
State average from 954 schools: | 65% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 79% |
State average from 954 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 77% |
State average from 954 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathDR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 73% |
State average from 954 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 595 |
State average from 954 schools: | 544 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 954 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 74% |
State average from 954 schools: | 51% |
Minority RateDR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 97% |
State average from 954 schools: | 45% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 336 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 336 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 100
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 69% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 314
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 307
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 73% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 314
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 307
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 321 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 321 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 96
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 69% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 302
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 295
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 73% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 302
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 295
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 244 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 244 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 68
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 65% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 229
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 222
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 69% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 229
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 222
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 126 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 126 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientDR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 66% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 109
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 73% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 109
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 78% |
State average from 862 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in MathDR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 75% |
State average from 862 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 87% |
State average from 862 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 42% |
State average from 862 schools: | 43% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 74% |
State average from 862 schools: | 70% |
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math GainsHere: | 64% |
State average from 862 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingDR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 65% |
State average from 862 schools: | 66% |
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 67% |
State average from 862 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere: | 552 |
State average from 862 schools: | 539 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 862 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 71% |
State average from 865 schools: | 58% |
Minority RateHere: | 96% |
State average from 865 schools: | 56% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 316 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 317 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 97% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 101
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 67% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 306
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 65% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 307
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 300 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 301 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 97% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 96
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 66% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 290
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientDR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 64% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 291
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 232 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 233 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 96% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 74
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 62% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 223
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 224
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 138 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 138 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 97% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 51% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 134
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientDR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 134
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 44% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 36% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 84% |
State average from 848 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 85% |
State average from 848 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 95% |
State average from 848 schools: | 79% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 68% |
State average from 848 schools: | 62% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 70% |
State average from 848 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 74% |
State average from 848 schools: | 61% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsDR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 476 |
State average from 848 schools: | 413 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 848 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: N
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 74% |
State average from 848 schools: | 58% |
Minority RateHere: | 97% |
State average from 848 schools: | 55% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 312 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 312 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 83
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 74% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 293
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientDR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 72% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 293
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 299 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 299 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 91% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 78
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 73% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 282
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 71% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 282
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 234 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 234 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 65
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 71% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 216
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 69% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 216
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 128 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 128 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 61% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 115
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 62% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 115
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 44% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 57
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 28% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 57
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 79% |
State average from 834 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 80% |
State average from 834 schools: | 67% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 92% |
State average from 834 schools: | 79% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 69% |
State average from 834 schools: | 66% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 79% |
State average from 834 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 63% |
State average from 834 schools: | 60% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere: | 462 |
State average from 834 schools: | 412 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 834 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: N
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 76% |
State average from 834 schools: | 60% |
Minority RateDR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 96% |
State average from 832 schools: | 54% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1416 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 319 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 17% |
State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 37% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 33% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 75% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1677 |
State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 336 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 35% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 36% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 15% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 86% |
State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1644 |
State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 309 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 14% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 10% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 41% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 26% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 76% |
State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17DR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 16 |
State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 314 |
State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 20% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 29% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 37% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 51% |
State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12DR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 7 |
State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1599 |
State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 365 |
State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 29% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4DR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 46% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 20% |
State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 96% |
State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1631 |
State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 340 |
State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 19% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 34% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4DR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 28% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 15% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 77% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8DR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 7 |
State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7DR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 4 |
State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1741 |
State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 348 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 10% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 20% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 25% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 30% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 70% |
State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8DR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 7 |
State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1366 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 311 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1553 |
State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 315 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 08%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreDR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 1663 |
State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 312 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 318 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1519 |
State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 347 |
State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1517 |
State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 314 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1685 |
State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 337 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 110
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Unscore - Combined: 5
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 54%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1392 |
State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 315 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreDR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 1564 |
State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 317 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1588 |
State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 299 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 311 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1497 |
State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 343 |
State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1564 |
State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 325 |
State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1676 |
State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500DR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 335 |
State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 112 |
State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 637 |
State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)DR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 15 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)DR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 7 |
State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 652 |
State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Literary (max 18)DR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 14 |
State average: | 14 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 117 |
State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 664 |
State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 103
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 306 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 65%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 88%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1357 |
State average: | 1342 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500DR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 309 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1513 |
State average from 1875 schools: | 1542 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 308 |
State average: | 313 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007DR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 1561 |
State average: | 1546 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1406 |
State average: | 1397 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 155
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1607 |
State average from 1873 schools: | 1629 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 302 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1640 |
State average: | 1632 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006DR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 1492 |
State average: | 1532 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 148
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500DR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 286 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1425 |
State average: | 1413 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 327 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1483 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 1525 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 306 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1499 |
State average: | 1528 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006DR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 1430 |
State average: | 1414 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 69
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1685 |
State average from 1872 schools: | 1647 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 336 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1699 |
State average: | 1649 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1474 |
State average: | 1519 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 225
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 124
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 628 |
State average from 1891 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR: 57
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 102
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 636 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 642 |
Median NPR: 56
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 91
Mean Scale ScoreDR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 665 |
State average from 1870 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR: 70
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 124
Mean Scale ScoreDR. CARLOS J. FINLAY ELEMENTARY: | 631 |
State average from 1891 schools: | 632 |
Median NPR: 67
Number Sense (max 14): 10
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 102
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 643 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 652 |
Median NPR: 70
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 91
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 662 |
State average from 1870 schools: | 663 |
Median NPR: 72
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 102
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 295 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 49%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 84%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 58%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Miami, FL
- Dr. Carlos J. Finlay Elementary School in Miami, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: