Dr John Long Middle School in Wesley Chapel, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 65.

2025 MANSFIELD BLVD
Wesley Chapel, FL 33543

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Terrace Community Middle School (8.7 miles):

92
Walker Middle School (16.4 miles):

74
Dr John Long Middle School:

65
Hill Middle School (14.9 miles):

58
Buchanan Middle School (11.0 miles):

44
Adams Middle School (13.1 miles):

32
Raymond B. Stewart Middle School (9.6 miles):

16
Carl Sagan Academy School (13.2 miles):

4
Dr John Long Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Pasco County:

43
Wesley Chapel:

48
Dr John Long Middle School:

65

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (813) 346-6200 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 51
School number: 86
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: PASCO
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (813) 346-6291
Principal: Elizabeth Brown
School Web Address: WWW.PASCO.K12.FL.US

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

80%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

79%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

57%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

80%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

71%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

76%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

605
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

35%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

45%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 4

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1705 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1705 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 542
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1625
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1562

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1627
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1560
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 937 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 937 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 288
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 904
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 868

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 904
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 866
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 179 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 179 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 170
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 160

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 170
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 159
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 402 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 402 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 144
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 374
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 363

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 375
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 363
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 70
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 72
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 592 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 592 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 188
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 547
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 521

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 548
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 520
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 101 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 101 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 81
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 80
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 81
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 80
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 192 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 192 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 184
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 178

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 184
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 177
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

80%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

77%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

98%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

59%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

73%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

72%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

606
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

31%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

44%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1632 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1632 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 488
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1577
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1505

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1576
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1504
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 914 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 914 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 280
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 894
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 855

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 893
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 854
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 177 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 177 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 56
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 171
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 159

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 171
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 159
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 361 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 361 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 109
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 337
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 328

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 337
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 328
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 492 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 492 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 158
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 466
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 438

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 466
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 437
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 101 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 101 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 82
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 82
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 172 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 172 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 160
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 153

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 160
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 153
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

77%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

78%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

96%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

49%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

68%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

80%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

72%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

587
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

30%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

43%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1531 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1530 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 474
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1455
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1332

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1454
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1331
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 874 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 873 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 273
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 841
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 773

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 840
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 772
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 147 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 147 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 128
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 115

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 128
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 115
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 338 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 338 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 106
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 322
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 290

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 322
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 290
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 453 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 452 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 139
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 423
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 380

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 422
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 380
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 81 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 81 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 153 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 153 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 53
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 141
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 119

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 141
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 117
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

73%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

72%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

97%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

47%
State average from 538 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

79%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

70%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

72%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

576
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

26%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

41%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1273 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1272 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

99%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 363
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1182
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1182
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 740 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 739 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 206
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 704
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 704
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 137 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 137 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 119
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 119
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 256 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 256 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 72
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 235
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 235
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 340 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 340 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 88
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 300
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 301
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 116 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 116 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 103
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 104
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1837
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

12%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

32%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

81%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1928
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

31%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

14%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

82%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1953
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

21%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

64%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

324
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

52%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

10
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1738
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

325
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

17%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

21%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

22%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

62%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1896
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

9%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

24%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

14%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

76%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1954
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

42%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

15%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

79%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1827
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1879
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1966
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

333
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1768
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1861
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1965
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

338
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 493
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 97%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1794
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1867
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1919
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1734
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1892
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1955
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

335
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

551
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

685
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

76
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

14
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

9
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

492
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

694
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

77
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

482
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

696
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

72
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 486
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

312
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 59%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 94%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1779
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1793
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1712
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 81

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1836
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1851
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1755
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 96

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1899
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 83%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1909
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1819
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 89

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1718
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 81%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1724
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1666
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 58

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1867
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1875
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1718
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 156

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1918
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 84%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1921
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1830
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 92

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 429
Mean Scale Score
Here:

683
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 74
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 429
Mean Scale Score
Here:

688
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 73
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 394
Mean Scale Score
Here:

697
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 73
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 429
Mean Scale Score
Here:

682
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 74
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 429
Mean Scale Score
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

700
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 79
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 394
Mean Scale Score
DR JOHN LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL:

711
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 79
Number Sense (max 9): 7
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 388
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

307
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 56%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 94%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Wesley Chapel, FL
  5. Dr John Long Middle School in Wesley Chapel, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.