City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 28.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Oviedo High School (10.4 miles): | 83 |
| Lake Brantley High School (11.5 miles): | 67 |
| Gateway School (7.6 miles): | 55 |
| Timber Creek High School (10.0 miles): | 42 |
| Ocoee High School (15.3 miles): | 32 |
| Drop Back In School: | 28 |
| Wekiva High School (11.8 miles): | 15 |
| Pace Center For Girls School (1.3 miles): | 6 |
| Ae Yop School (10.6 miles): | 0 |
Drop Back In School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Orange County: | 44 |
| Orlando: | 42 |
| Drop Back In School: | 28 |
1
toni
Sep 9, 2011 @ 2:14 pm
is there an age limit? i am 20 and a half a credit short. i couldnt graduate but i want my diploma not a ged.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 48
School number: 123
School type: Senior High
District Name: ORANGE
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (407) 658-9559
Principal: Felicia N Walker
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
School Web Address: alternativesunlimited.com
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| DROP BACK IN: | 61% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 62% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 86% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 37% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 58% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 449 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 52% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 489 |
| State average from 452 schools: | 522 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| DROP BACK IN: | 99% |
| State average from 450 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: Pending
Grade in 2009: B
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: N
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| DROP BACK IN: | 57% |
| State average from 454 schools: | 50% |
Minority Rate
Region: 2| DROP BACK IN: | 18% |
| State average from 454 schools: | 47% |
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 120 (49%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 109 (46%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 84 (47%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 78 (45%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23 (48%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21 (44%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (57%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (54%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16 (50%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14 (45%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26 (54%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23 (50%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| DROP BACK IN: | 57% |
| State average from 443 schools: | 60% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 440 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 443 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 443 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 441 schools: | 59% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 442 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 442 schools: | 56% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 441 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 509 |
| State average from 441 schools: | 522 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 448 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: B
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: N
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 446 schools: | 46% |
Minority Rate
Region: 2| Here: | 18% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 45% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 891 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 889 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 799
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 796
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 731 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 730 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 660
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 658
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 78 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 77 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 75
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 69
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 505 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 503 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 439
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 438
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 144 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 144 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 27% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 119
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 33% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 118
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 61% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 36% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 45% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 61% |
Making Math Gains
| DROP BACK IN: | 72% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 74% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 55% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10| DROP BACK IN: | 72% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 71% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 512 |
| State average from 425 schools: | 526 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 42% |
Minority Rate
| DROP BACK IN: | 19% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 44% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 929 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 930 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 824
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| DROP BACK IN: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 823
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 758 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 759 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 676
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 675
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 75
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 75
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 501 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 502 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 438
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 438
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 161 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 161 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 133
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 31% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 133
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 45% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 84% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 39% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 41% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 52% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 49% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
| Here: | 473 |
| State average from 370 schools: | 482 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 97% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 372 schools: | 38% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 18% |
| State average from 372 schools: | 48% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 946 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 944 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 767 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 766 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 85 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 503 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 501 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| DROP BACK IN: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 160 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 160 (94%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 21% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 29% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 360 schools: | 45% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 68% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| DROP BACK IN: | 80% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 83% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 53% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 53% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| DROP BACK IN: | 369 |
| State average from 361 schools: | 374 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 98% |
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: N
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 362 schools: | 38% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 18% |
| State average from 362 schools: | 47% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 994 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 993 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 815 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 815 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 93 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 92 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| DROP BACK IN: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 18% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 30% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 531 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 531 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 40% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 164 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| DROP BACK IN: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 19% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 26% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 42% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 67% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 84% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 51% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 73% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 53% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 352 |
| State average from 348 schools: | 371 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 98% |
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: N
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 347 schools: | 38% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 18% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 45% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1056 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 260 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| DROP BACK IN: | 44% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| DROP BACK IN: | 6% |
| State average: | 32% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 44% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 17 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| DROP BACK IN: | 2 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1330 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 277 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 29% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 46% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| DROP BACK IN: | 1829 |
| State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 333 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 79% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| DROP BACK IN: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1829 |
| State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 321 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| DROP BACK IN: | 12% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| DROP BACK IN: | 26% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 70% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 17 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| DROP BACK IN: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1869 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 306 |
| State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 3% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| DROP BACK IN: | 48% |
| State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1651 |
| State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 262 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| DROP BACK IN: | 61% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| DROP BACK IN: | 27% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| DROP BACK IN: | 1% |
| State average: | 12% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 11 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1509 |
| State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 223 |
| State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 89% |
| State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 28% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 15 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| DROP BACK IN: | 313 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 42% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 2% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 40% |
| State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| DROP BACK IN: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| DROP BACK IN: | 240 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 90% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| DROP BACK IN: | 6% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 30% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1090 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 255 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 44% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 32% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| DROP BACK IN: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1293 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 263 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 46% |
| State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 26% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1728 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 323 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 60% |
| State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| DROP BACK IN: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1796 |
| State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 308 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| DROP BACK IN: | 19% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| DROP BACK IN: | 33% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| DROP BACK IN: | 4% |
| State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 61% |
| State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| DROP BACK IN: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1891 |
| State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 319 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| DROP BACK IN: | 9% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 40% |
| State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 10% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| DROP BACK IN: | 60% |
| State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1708 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 239 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 62% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| DROP BACK IN: | 29% |
| State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 21% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| DROP BACK IN: | 1757 |
| State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 268 |
| State average: | 326 |
Percent Passing
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 53% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| DROP BACK IN: | 2% |
| State average: | 33% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| DROP BACK IN: | 3 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 5 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1721 |
| State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| Here: | 313 |
| State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1826 |
| State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%| Here: | 320 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| DROP BACK IN: | 1869 |
| State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| Here: | 306 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1554 |
| State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 81%| Here: | 244 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1512 |
| State average: | 1921 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 3%| Here: | 223 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 94%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%| Here: | 303 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 81%| Here: | 235 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1689 |
| State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%| Here: | 313 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| DROP BACK IN: | 1796 |
| State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%| Here: | 308 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1874 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| Here: | 315 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1762 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%| Here: | 254 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| DROP BACK IN: | 1808 |
| State average: | 1972 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 21%| Here: | 280 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 1
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 146
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 92%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 42
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 7%| DROP BACK IN: | 3 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 36%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| DROP BACK IN: | 1705 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%| Here: | 310 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1793 |
| State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%| Here: | 314 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1850 |
| State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%| Here: | 303 |
| State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1907 |
| State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%| Here: | 309 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1977 |
| State average: | 1935 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 59%| Here: | 309 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%| Here: | 297 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%| Here: | 296 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1661 |
| State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%| Here: | 307 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1789 |
| State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%| Here: | 306 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1856 |
| State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%| Here: | 310 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1919 |
| State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%| Here: | 301 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1994 |
| State average: | 1984 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 80%| Here: | 326 |
| State average: | 323 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 188 |
| State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 668 |
| State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 60 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| DROP BACK IN: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 152 |
| State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 675 |
| State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 62 |
| State average: | 66 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 12 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| DROP BACK IN: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 179 |
| State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 684 |
| State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 61 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 12 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Strategies (max 10)
| DROP BACK IN: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 226 |
| State average: | 273 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 692 |
| State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 60 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| DROP BACK IN: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| DROP BACK IN: | 11 |
| State average: | 11 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 11 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 146 |
| State average: | 237 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 711 |
| State average from 2096 schools: | 709 |
Median NPR
| DROP BACK IN: | 69 |
| State average: | 65 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| DROP BACK IN: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 187
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 28%| DROP BACK IN: | 278 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 34%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 81%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 157
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 22%| DROP BACK IN: | 289 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 45%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 74%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1689 |
| State average from 878 schools: | 1661 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%| Here: | 307 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| DROP BACK IN: | 1775 |
| State average from 808 schools: | 1746 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| Here: | 311 |
| State average: | 305 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1826 |
| State average from 819 schools: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%| Here: | 297 |
| State average: | 294 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 6
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1876 |
| State average from 612 schools: | 1849 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%| Here: | 303 |
| State average: | 298 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 4
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1915 |
| State average from 573 schools: | 1879 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 50%| DROP BACK IN: | 298 |
| State average: | 291 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 12
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%| Here: | 295 |
| State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%| Here: | 304 |
| State average: | 295 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 8
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1661 |
| State average from 873 schools: | 1641 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%| Here: | 307 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1765 |
| State average from 804 schools: | 1777 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%| Here: | 300 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1844 |
| State average from 815 schools: | 1851 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%| Here: | 307 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1901 |
| State average from 613 schools: | 1884 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%| DROP BACK IN: | 295 |
| State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 4
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1970 |
| State average from 581 schools: | 1950 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 78%| Here: | 320 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 4
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 159
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 65| Here: | 672 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 671 |
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 175
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 62| Here: | 676 |
| State average from 796 schools: | 675 |
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 200
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 61| Here: | 683 |
| State average from 810 schools: | 685 |
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 235
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 65| Here: | 698 |
| State average from 597 schools: | 696 |
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 131
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 50| Here: | 692 |
| State average from 575 schools: | 695 |
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 159
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 68| Here: | 673 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 669 |
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 175
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 67| Here: | 683 |
| State average from 796 schools: | 685 |
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 202
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 66| Here: | 693 |
| State average from 810 schools: | 698 |
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 234
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 66| DROP BACK IN: | 705 |
| State average from 597 schools: | 708 |
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 8
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 132
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 60| Here: | 709 |
| State average from 575 schools: | 710 |
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 214
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 48%| Here: | 257 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 22%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%| DROP BACK IN: | 3 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 74%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 45%
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 148
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 36%| Here: | 272 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 30%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 2%| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 58%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 37%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.