City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 39.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Alexander W Dreyfoos Junior Of The Arts School (3.0 miles): | 98 |
| Forest Hill Community High School (4.2 miles): | 64 |
| Village Academy On The Art & Sara Jo Kobacker Campus School (17.1 miles): | 55 |
| John I. Leonard High School (4.9 miles): | 44 |
| Gold Coast Community School: | 39 |
| William T. Dwyer High School (12.1 miles): | 35 |
| John F. Kennedy Middle School (5.6 miles): | 24 |
| South Tech Academy School (14.3 miles): | 9 |
| Palm Beach Juvenile Correctional Facility School (5.6 miles): | 0 |
Gold Coast Community School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Palm Beach County: | 45 |
| West Palm Beach: | 47 |
| Gold Coast Community School: | 39 |
1
Samantha
Mar 27, 2013 @ 5:17 pm
Does Gold Coast take in pregnant teens to go to their school?
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 50
School number: 1641
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: PALM BEACH
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 9
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (561) 687-6350
Principal: Gwendolyn Johnson
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status:
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 23
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 84
Senate District: 27
School Web Address: www.edline.net/pages/Gold_Coast_Community_School
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 53% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 52% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 31% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 60% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 610 |
| State average from 4 schools: | 471 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 81% |
Minority Rate
Region: 5| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 91% |
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 135 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 135 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 13% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 19% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 90 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 90 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 10% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 16% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 119 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 119 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 13% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 20% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 82
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 52% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 45% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 40% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 33% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 61% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 60% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 61% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 500 |
| State average from 4 schools: | 467 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 100% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: B
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 74% |
Minority Rate
Region: 4| Here: | 37% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 75% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 152 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 152 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 141
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 141
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 94 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 94 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 25% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 80
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 80
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 63% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 55% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 87% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 25% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 29% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 64% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 65% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 72% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 529 |
| State average from 3 schools: | 507 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 100% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 60% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 67% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 68% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 186 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 186 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 158
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 158
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 102 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 102 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 72 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 72 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 39% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 30% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 108 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 108 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 98
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 42% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 98
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 29% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 61% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 60% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 55% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 87% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 26% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 28% |
Making Reading Gains
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 66% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included| Here: | 44% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 63% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
| Here: | 461 |
| State average from 4 schools: | 491 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 68% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 89% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 442 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 441 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 369 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 368 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 302 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 301 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 67% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 54% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 90% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 72% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 72% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 402 |
| State average from 4 schools: | 424 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 99% |
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 72% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 89% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 462 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 461 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 400 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 399 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 67% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 295 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 294 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 56 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 50% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 45% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 87% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 56% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 63% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 58% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 380 |
| State average from 4 schools: | 358 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 98% |
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 66% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 72% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 88% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1291 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 298 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 42% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 65% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 17 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1669 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 335 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 76% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 21 |
| State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1625 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 306 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 67% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 3 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1630 |
| State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 283 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 39% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 44% |
| State average: | 33% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 44% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1686 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 268 |
| State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 43% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 45% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 33% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1654 |
| State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 263 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 73% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 12% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 11 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 324 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 27% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 42% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 4% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 57% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 248 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 64% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 31% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 1499 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 343 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 82% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1572 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 327 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 74% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1727 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 345 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 20% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 40% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 70% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1682 |
| State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 279 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 50% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 22% |
| State average: | 31% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1740 |
| State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 281 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 42% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 1% |
| State average: | 10% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1795 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 264 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 49% |
| State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 31% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1293 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| Here: | 299 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1628 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%| Here: | 328 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 08%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1585 |
| State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%| Here: | 298 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1481 |
| State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%| Here: | 255 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1676 |
| State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%| Here: | 266 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1729 |
| State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%| Here: | 276 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%| Here: | 288 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 69%| Here: | 247 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 1274 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%| Here: | 294 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1590 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 331 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1659 |
| State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%| Here: | 331 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1473 |
| State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 76%| Here: | 228 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1755 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%| Here: | 285 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1855 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%| Here: | 282 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 40
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 75%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 71
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1311 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%| Here: | 302 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1470 |
| State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 301 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1556 |
| State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%| Here: | 293 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1358 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 248 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1499 |
| State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 51%| Here: | 258 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1657 |
| State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%| Here: | 262 |
| State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1728 |
| State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%| Here: | 276 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%| Here: | 287 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%| Here: | 223 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1439 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%| Here: | 330 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1520 |
| State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| Here: | 315 |
| State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1586 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| Here: | 315 |
| State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1392 |
| State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 70%| Here: | 245 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1566 |
| State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 251 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1721 |
| State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%| Here: | 276 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1815 |
| State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%| Here: | 270 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 58 |
| State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 627 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 56 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 64 |
| State average: | 97 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 643 |
| State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 61 |
| State average: | 69 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 10 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 65 |
| State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 655 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 62 |
| State average: | 71 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 629 |
| State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 25 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 33 |
| State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 643 |
| State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 33 |
| State average: | 66 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 12 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 58 |
| State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 645 |
| State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 25 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 12 |
Informational (max 18)
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 10 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 33 |
| State average: | 273 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 663 |
| State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 32 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 11 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 11 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 11 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 64
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 19%| Here: | 290 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 47%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 65
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 63%| Here: | 232 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 12%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 74%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 1269 |
| State average: | 1342 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%| Here: | 295 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1407 |
| State average from 1875 schools: | 1542 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%| Here: | 290 |
| State average: | 313 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1415 |
| State average: | 1546 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 95| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 1320 |
| State average: | 1397 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1551 |
| State average from 1873 schools: | 1629 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%| Here: | 292 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1591 |
| State average: | 1632 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 65| Here: | 1526 |
| State average: | 1532 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%| Here: | 286 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1356 |
| State average: | 1413 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| Here: | 312 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1441 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 1525 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%| Here: | 297 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1453 |
| State average: | 1528 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 100| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 1353 |
| State average: | 1414 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1612 |
| State average from 1872 schools: | 1647 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 321 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 79%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1655 |
| State average: | 1649 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 107| GOLD COAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: | 1548 |
| State average: | 1519 |
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 146
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 51| Here: | 621 |
| State average from 1891 schools: | 633 |
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 150
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 47| Here: | 627 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 642 |
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 142
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 66| Here: | 659 |
| State average from 1870 schools: | 667 |
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 146
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 58| Here: | 619 |
| State average from 1891 schools: | 632 |
Number Sense (max 14): 10
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 150
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 62| Here: | 634 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 652 |
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 142
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 64| Here: | 651 |
| State average from 1870 schools: | 663 |
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 142
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 19%| Here: | 289 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 53%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 48%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 82%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 70%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.