Lake Worth Community Middle School in Lake Worth, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 36.

1300 BARNETT DR
Lake Worth, FL 33461

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Bak Middle Of The Arts School (8.0 miles):	94
Christa Mcauliffe Middle School (7.2 miles):	66
Renaissance Learning Center School (9.2 miles):	57
Lincoln Elementary School (10.6 miles):	48
Okeeheelee Middle School (5.3 miles):	37
Lake Worth Community Middle School:	36
Carver Middle School (12.2 miles):	27
Bear Lakes Middle School (7.4 miles):	18

Lake Worth Community Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Palm Beach County:	45
Lake Worth:	48
Lake Worth Community Middle:	36

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (561) 540-5500 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 50
School number: 2131
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: PALM BEACH
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (561) 540-5559
Principal: Jeff B Eassa
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status:
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 22
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 85
Senate District: 30
School Web Address: www.edline.net/pages/Lake_Worth_Middle_School

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	54%
State average from 613 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	60%
State average from 612 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	86%
State average from 613 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	34%
State average from 612 schools:	51%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	65%
State average from 613 schools:	64%

Making Math Gains

Here:	79%
State average from 612 schools:	70%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	68%
State average from 613 schools:	62%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	76%
State average from 613 schools:	68%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	522
State average from 613 schools:	545

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 613 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: B

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	91%
State average from 614 schools:	56%

Minority Rate

Here:	90%
State average from 614 schools:	49%

Region: 5

Title I: YES

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 854 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 852 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 245
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 771
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 743

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	51%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 769
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 741
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 339 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 337 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 110
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	42%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 305
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 296

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	39%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 305
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 296
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 389 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 389 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 111
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	45%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 351
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 338

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 351
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 337
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 774 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 772 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 229
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	45%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 693
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 668

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	49%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 692
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 666
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 259 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 257 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 66
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	24%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 222
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 221

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	31%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 223
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 221
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 171 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 172 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	28%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 162
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 151

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	30%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 159
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 149
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	49%
State average from 613 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Math

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	54%
State average from 613 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	94%
State average from 613 schools:	92%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	30%
State average from 613 schools:	49%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	68%
State average from 613 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	67%
State average from 613 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	79%
State average from 613 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	70%
State average from 613 schools:	67%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	511
State average from 613 schools:	553

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 613 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	92%
State average from 613 schools:	52%

Minority Rate

Here:	88%
State average from 613 schools:	48%

Region: 5

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 787 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 786 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 223
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	41%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 692
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 665

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 695
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 669
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 88 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 88 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 313 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 313 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 93
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	38%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 266
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 259

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	39%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 266
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 260
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 347 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 346 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 96
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	34%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 312
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 303

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	46%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 314
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 305
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 722 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 721 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 203
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	41%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 634
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 610

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 637
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 614
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 223 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 223 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	19%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 175
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 173

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	27%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 175
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 173
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 171 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 171 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 48
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	24%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 157
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 150

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	30%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 158
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 152
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	40%
State average from 603 schools:	69%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	50%
State average from 603 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	86%
State average from 603 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	28%
State average from 602 schools:	46%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	58%
State average from 602 schools:	65%

Making Math Gains

Here:	70%
State average from 602 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	71%
State average from 602 schools:	64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	77%
State average from 602 schools:	69%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	480
State average from 602 schools:	543

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 604 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	92%
State average from 605 schools:	49%

Minority Rate

Here:	91%
State average from 605 schools:	48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 752 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 751 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 229
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	32%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 676
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 635

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	42%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 673
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 632
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 301 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 301 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 92
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	31%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 274
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 252

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	35%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 274
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 252
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 351 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 350 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 111
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	30%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 314
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 299

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	44%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 311
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 297
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 690 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 689 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 205
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	31%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 616
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 578

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	41%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 613
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 575
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 256 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 256 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 63
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	13%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 224
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 195

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	24%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 223
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 195
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 161 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 161 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	19%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 150
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 148

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	24%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 149
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 147
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	84%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	78%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	94%
State average from 539 schools:	91%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	61%
State average from 538 schools:	44%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	77%
State average from 539 schools:	61%

Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included

Making Math Gains

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	72%
State average from 539 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	79%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	68%
State average from 539 schools:	67%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	613
State average from 539 schools:	523

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 539 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	58%
State average from 541 schools:	49%

Minority Rate

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	41%
State average from 542 schools:	53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 331 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 332 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	95%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 87
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	75%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 305
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 306
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 195 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 196 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	96%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 56
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	80%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 186
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	72%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 187
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 75 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 75 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 194 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 194 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	69%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 175
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	61%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 175
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	39%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	29%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	81%
State average from 526 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	73%
State average from 526 schools:	63%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	87%
State average from 526 schools:	89%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	64%
State average from 526 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	71%
State average from 526 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	59%
State average from 526 schools:	72%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	435
State average from 526 schools:	425

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 526 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	48%
State average from 525 schools:	50%

Minority Rate

Here:	36%
State average from 526 schools:	52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 353 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 353 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 75
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 326
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 326
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 231 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 231 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 44

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	79%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 218
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	72%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 218
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 47

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	57%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	59%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 39

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	59%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 161 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 161 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 35

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 146
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	62%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 146
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	38%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 56
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	38%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 56
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	77%
State average from 505 schools:	59%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	68%
State average from 505 schools:	60%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	82%
State average from 506 schools:	83%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	70%
State average from 505 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

Here:	68%
State average from 505 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	58%
State average from 505 schools:	66%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	423
State average from 506 schools:	397

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 506 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	50%
State average from 506 schools:	51%

Minority Rate

Here:	32%
State average from 506 schools:	50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1431
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	13%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	5%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	40%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	33%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	9%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	82%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	18
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	1596
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	15%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	15%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	34%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	26%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	10%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	71%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	19
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1694
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	318
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	12%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	10%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	41%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	29%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	8%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	78%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	16
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	11
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1595
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	290
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	30%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	22%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	26%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	16%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	5%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	48%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	12
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1668
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	290
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	29%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	20%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	14%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	51%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	15
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1765
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	285
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	33%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	33%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	30%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	3%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	3%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	34%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	3
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	14
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	6
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	10%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	30%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	48%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	9%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	4%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	60%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	10
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	9
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	279
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	43%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	32%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	21%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	4%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	25%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	8
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1485
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	340
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	9%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	10%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	35%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	37%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	10%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	82%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	5
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1569
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	326
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	10%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	10%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	47%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	21%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	12%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	79%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1671
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	334
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	6%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	36%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	29%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	23%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	5%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	58%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1669
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	309
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	32%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	20%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	25%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	16%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	7%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	48%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1742
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	294
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	31%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	24%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	25%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	17%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	46%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	3
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1833
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	305
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	24%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	23%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	37%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	12%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	10%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	53%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1388
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	315
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1652
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	332
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 04%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 06%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1646
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	309
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1566
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	285
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1593
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	276
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1763
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	284
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	270
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1440
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	330
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1540
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	319
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1586
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	315
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1580
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	288
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1719
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	289
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	1836
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	305
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 80

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 91%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 251

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Unscore - Combined: 4
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 12%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 84%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1350
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	308
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1586
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	320
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1644
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	309
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1448
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	264
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1586
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	275
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1736
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	278
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	326
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	275
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1422
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	326
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1512
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	313
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1606
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	320
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1533
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	277
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1703
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	285
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1843
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	307
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	74
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

Here:	632
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	60
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	79
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

Here:	653
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

Here:	70
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	14
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	90
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

Here:	671
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

Here:	75
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	252
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

Here:	643
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

Here:	37
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	10
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	6
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	12
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	238
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

Here:	656
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

Here:	44
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	10
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	10
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	8
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	12
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	5
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	259
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	667
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	44
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	11
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	11
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	9
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 77

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	327
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 73%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 87%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 252

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	252
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 25%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 75%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1372
State average:	1342

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	312
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	1616
State average from 1875 schools:	1542

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	326
State average:	313

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1623
State average:	1546

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1424
State average:	1397

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 200

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1620
State average from 1873 schools:	1629

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	305
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1634
State average:	1632

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1489
State average:	1532

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 145

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1741
State average from 878 schools:	1661

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1740
State average:	1663

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

LAKE WORTH COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	1619
State average:	1592

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 121

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	314
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1409
State average:	1413

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1543
State average from 1874 schools:	1525

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	320
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1544
State average:	1528

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1414
State average:	1414

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 130

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1618
State average from 1872 schools:	1647

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1624
State average:	1649

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1492
State average:	1519

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 132

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1740
State average from 873 schools:	1641

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	325
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1735
State average:	1645

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1619
State average:	1620

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 116

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 79

Mean Scale Score

Here:	635
State average from 1891 schools:	633

Median NPR: 63
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 95

Mean Scale Score

Here:	653
State average from 1874 schools:	642

Median NPR: 70
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 71

Mean Scale Score

Here:	665
State average from 1870 schools:	667

Median NPR: 71
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 82

Mean Scale Score

Here:	679
State average from 874 schools:	671

Median NPR: 71
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 79

Mean Scale Score

Here:	626
State average from 1891 schools:	632

Median NPR: 64
Number Sense (max 14): 10
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 95

Mean Scale Score

Here:	658
State average from 1874 schools:	652

Median NPR: 79
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 71

Mean Scale Score

Here:	659
State average from 1870 schools:	663

Median NPR: 70
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 82

Mean Scale Score

Here:	682
State average from 874 schools:	669

Median NPR: 75
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 96

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	328
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 78%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 14
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 90%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AL	AZ	CA	CO	CT	DE	FL
GA	HI	IA	ID	IL	IN	KS
LA	MA	MD	MI	MN	MO	NC
NE	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	TN	TX	UT
VA	WA	WI	WV

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY