Lakeland Highlands Middle School in Lakeland, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 49.

740 LAKE MIRIAM DR
Lakeland, FL 33813

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Union Academy School (9.5 miles):

91
Lakeland Highlands Middle School (0.0 miles):

63
South Mckeel Academy School (3.2 miles):

51
Lakeland Highlands Middle School:

49
Denison Middle School (14.3 miles):

41
Lake Gibson Middle School (10.7 miles):

36
Sleepy Hill Middle School (8.5 miles):

24
Compass Middle Charter School (9.4 miles):

12
Sabal Palm School (16.0 miles):

0
Lakeland Highlands Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Polk County:

41
Lakeland:

44
Lakeland Highlands Middle School:

49

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (863) 648-3500 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 53
School number: 1771
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: POLK
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (863) 648-3580
Principal: Robert Hartley
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 12
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 63
Senate District: 17

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

77%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

86%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

54%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

60%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

553
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

41%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

33%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 4

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1290 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1289 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 373
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1218
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1168

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1218
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1166
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 866 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 866 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 258
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 836
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 795

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 836
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 795
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 198 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 197 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 165
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 162

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 165
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 162
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 154 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 154 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 48
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 150
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 147

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 150
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 146
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 531 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 530 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 132
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 479
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 464

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 479
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 462
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 159 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 159 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 142
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 133

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 142
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 133
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

76%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

53%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

72%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

61%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

557
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

35%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

32%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1250 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1249 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 391
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1182
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1131

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1182
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1126
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 860 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 860 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 279
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 832
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 799

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 832
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 796
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 176 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 176 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 150
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 144

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 150
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 143
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 139 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 138 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 423 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 422 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 112
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 378
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 360

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 378
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 357
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 151 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 151 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 140
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 137

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 140
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 137
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

74%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

90%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

52%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

59%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

69%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

553
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

30%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

33%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1250 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1248 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 395
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1185
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1114

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1182
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1113
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 846 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 845 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 278
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 817
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 769

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 815
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 769
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 190 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 189 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 56
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 168
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 162

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 167
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 161
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 143 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 143 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 133
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 125

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 133
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 125
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 373 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 373 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 96
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 336
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 315

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 335
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 315
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 154 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 153 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 145
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 140

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 144
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 139
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

75%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

72%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

54%
State average from 538 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

63%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

64%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

548
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

29%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

29%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1194 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1195 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 374
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1123
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1118
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 843 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 844 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 272
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 806
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 804
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 159 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 158 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 139
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 137
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 123 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 124 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 111
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 343 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 345 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 99
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 304
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 303
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 151 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 151 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 140
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 141
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

73%
State average from 526 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 526 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 526 schools:

89%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 526 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 526 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

76%
State average from 526 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

455
State average from 526 schools:

425
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 526 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

28%
State average from 525 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

30%
State average from 526 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1154 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1141 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 378
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1109
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1106
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 815 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 810 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 276

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 793
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 791
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 167 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 161 (95%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 46
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 153
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 153
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 110 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 109 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 34

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 103
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 102
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 40

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 315 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 308 (95%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 89
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 292
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 292
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 144 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 142 (96%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 48
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 134
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 136
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 505 schools:

59%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

67%
State average from 505 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

90%
State average from 506 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

57%
State average from 505 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 505 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

61%
State average from 505 schools:

66%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

410
State average from 506 schools:

397
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 506 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

28%
State average from 506 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

27%
State average from 506 schools:

50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1602
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

350
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

5%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

24%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

50%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

15%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

89%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

20
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1777
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

353
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

39%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

21%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

88%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

22
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1742
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

17%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

25%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

70%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1918
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

338
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

33%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

16%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

78%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1913
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

59%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1809
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

42%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

29%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

19%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

29%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

10
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1800
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

277
State average:

302
Percent Passing
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

32%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

58%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

12%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

2%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

15%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

26%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

46%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

29%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

35%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

5%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

36%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1678
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

382
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

4%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

13%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

45%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

37%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

96%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1747
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

367
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

22%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

45%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

25%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

92%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1698
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

27%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

19%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

56%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1857
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

323
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

16%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

25%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

69%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1926
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

17%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

17%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

70%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1913
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

20%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

17%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

58%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1969
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

74%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

19%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

26%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

59%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1520
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1709
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 06%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 08%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1814
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1782
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1847
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1931
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1784
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1875
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

274
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1626
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

371
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 32%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1655
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

346
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1759
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

352
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1757
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1836
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1926
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1910
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1998
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 81%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 134
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 87%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 416
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 87%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 125
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 65%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1528
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

338
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1634
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1743
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1729
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1869
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1931
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1786
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1770
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

317
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

259
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1601
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

365
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1594
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1774
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

355
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1699
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1843
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1936
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1930
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1955
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

217
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

649
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

74
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

194
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

660
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

75
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

16
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

206
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

680
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

82
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

410
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

678
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

69
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

423
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

698
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

79
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

412
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

702
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

76
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

11
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

142
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

682
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

50
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

11
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

152
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

692
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

50
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 196
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

311
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 66%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 410
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

298
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 43%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 87%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 162
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

268
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 29%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 46%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 74%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1773
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1775
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1684
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 92

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1865
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

328
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1860
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1789
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 71

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1907
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

314
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 8
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1908
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1851
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 57

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1709
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1713
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1685
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 28

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1846
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1855
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1743
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 112

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1905
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1907
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1825
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 82

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 402
Mean Scale Score
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

684
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 75
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 409
Mean Scale Score
Here:

689
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 74
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 392
Mean Scale Score
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

699
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 74
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 402
Mean Scale Score
Here:

680
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 73
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 409
Mean Scale Score
Here:

699
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 78
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 392
Mean Scale Score
LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

709
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 77
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 388
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

291
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 42%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 87%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 70%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Lakeland, FL
  5. Lakeland Highlands Middle School in Lakeland, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.