City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
85.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Lakeside Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida: | 45 |
Broward County: | 47 |
Pembroke Pines: | 62 |
Lakeside Elementary School: | 85 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (754) 323-6400 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 6
School number: 3591
School type: Elementary
District Name: BROWARD
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (754) 323-6440
Principal: Linda Pazos
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 21
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 101
Senate District: 34
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 91% |
State average from 963 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in MathLAKESIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 89% |
State average from 963 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 98% |
State average from 963 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 70% |
State average from 962 schools: | 53% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 73% |
State average from 963 schools: | 64% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 64% |
State average from 963 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 66% |
State average from 963 schools: | 58% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 64% |
State average from 963 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 615 |
State average from 963 schools: | 543 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 963 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 119999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 30% |
State average from 963 schools: | 58% |
Minority RateHere: | 70% |
State average from 963 schools: | 47% |
Region: 5
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 437 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 436 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 147
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 410
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 395
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 85% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 410
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 394
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 135 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 135 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 130
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 124
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 130
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 124
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 84 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 81% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 78
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 80% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 77
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 179 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 179 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 90% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 163
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 160
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientLAKESIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 86% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 163
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 160
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 129 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 129 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 48
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 80% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 116
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 114
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 78% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 116
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 113
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 85 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 79% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 67
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 67
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 91% |
State average from 959 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 93% |
State average from 959 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 98% |
State average from 959 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 74% |
State average from 959 schools: | 52% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 79% |
State average from 959 schools: | 67% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 77% |
State average from 959 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 75% |
State average from 959 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 74% |
State average from 959 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)LAKESIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 661 |
State average from 959 schools: | 560 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 959 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateLAKESIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 21% |
State average from 959 schools: | 54% |
Minority RateHere: | 69% |
State average from 959 schools: | 46% |
Region: 3
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 432 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 432 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 128
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 86% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 412
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 402
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 89% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 412
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 402
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 139 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 139 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 89% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 136
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 132
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 90% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 136
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 132
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 81% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 81
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 80
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 85% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 81
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 80
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 171 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 171 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 163
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 158
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 163
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 158
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 97 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 97 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 75% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 77% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 77% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 85% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 89% |
State average from 954 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 89% |
State average from 954 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 96% |
State average from 954 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 57% |
State average from 954 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 76% |
State average from 954 schools: | 65% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 74% |
State average from 954 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 74% |
State average from 954 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 71% |
State average from 954 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 626 |
State average from 954 schools: | 544 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 954 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 19% |
State average from 954 schools: | 51% |
Minority RateHere: | 69% |
State average from 954 schools: | 45% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 449 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 449 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 147
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 83% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 434
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 422
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 86% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 434
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 422
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 150 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 150 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 85% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 148
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 146
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 148
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 146
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 85 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 85 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 74% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 65% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 164 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 164 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 57
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 87% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 158
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 154
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 89% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 158
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 154
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 66% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 72% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 85% |
State average from 862 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 86% |
State average from 862 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 95% |
State average from 862 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 61% |
State average from 862 schools: | 43% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 83% |
State average from 862 schools: | 70% |
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math GainsHere: | 67% |
State average from 862 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 74% |
State average from 862 schools: | 66% |
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 64% |
State average from 862 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsLAKESIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 615 |
State average from 862 schools: | 539 |
Percent TestedLAKESIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 100% |
State average from 862 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 17% |
State average from 865 schools: | 58% |
Minority RateHere: | 68% |
State average from 865 schools: | 56% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 526 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 526 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 98% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 164
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 81% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 504
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 82% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 504
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 161 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 161 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 98% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 157
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 83% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 157
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 98 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 61% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 74% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 211 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 211 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientLAKESIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 98% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 64
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 89% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 202
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 83% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 202
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 66% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 73% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingLAKESIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 89% |
State average from 848 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 88% |
State average from 848 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 95% |
State average from 848 schools: | 79% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 73% |
State average from 848 schools: | 62% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 80% |
State average from 848 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 71% |
State average from 848 schools: | 61% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere: | 496 |
State average from 848 schools: | 413 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 848 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 16% |
State average from 848 schools: | 58% |
Minority RateHere: | 66% |
State average from 848 schools: | 55% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 532 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 532 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 96% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 181
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 510
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 85% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 510
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 174 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 174 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 98% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 58
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 89% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 167
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 90% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 167
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 82 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 82 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 74% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 72
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 67% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 72
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 230 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 230 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 98% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 80
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 83% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 225
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 225
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 85% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 33
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 85% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 73% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 79
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 81% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 79
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 50% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 42
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 67% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 79 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 79 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 68% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 74
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 73% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 74
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 90% |
State average from 834 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 87% |
State average from 834 schools: | 67% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingLAKESIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 98% |
State average from 834 schools: | 79% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 76% |
State average from 834 schools: | 66% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 78% |
State average from 834 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 74% |
State average from 834 schools: | 60% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere: | 503 |
State average from 834 schools: | 412 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 834 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 14% |
State average from 834 schools: | 60% |
Minority RateHere: | 65% |
State average from 832 schools: | 54% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1567 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 344 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 26% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 48% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 89% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1690 |
State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500LAKESIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 338 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 34% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 37% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 13% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 85% |
State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9LAKESIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 5 |
State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1758 |
State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 329 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 29% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 45% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 85% |
State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 333 |
State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 25% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 53% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 10% |
State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 66% |
State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1617 |
State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 369 |
State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 27% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 39% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 27% |
State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 93% |
State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6LAKESIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 5 |
State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1675 |
State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 350 |
State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 10% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 40% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 27% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 19% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 86% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1768 |
State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500LAKESIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 354 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 22% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 18% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 42% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 75% |
State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8LAKESIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1464 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 327 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1736 |
State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 346 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 04%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 06%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1801 |
State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 337 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 334 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1560 |
State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 356 |
State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1754 |
State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 368 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1791 |
State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 359 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 130
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 5 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 12%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 96%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1505 |
State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 334 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreLAKESIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1734 |
State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 346 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 21
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreLAKESIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1757 |
State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 329 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 323 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1624 |
State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 370 |
State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1728 |
State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 362 |
State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreLAKESIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1767 |
State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500LAKESIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 354 |
State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 131 |
State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 649 |
State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Literary (max 18)LAKESIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 14 |
State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)LAKESIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 14 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)LAKESIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 16 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 668 |
State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Median NPRLAKESIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 81 |
State average: | 69 |
Informational (max 18)LAKESIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 14 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)LAKESIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 10 |
State average: | 10 |
Interpretation (max 20)LAKESIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 16 |
State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 166 |
State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 681 |
State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)LAKESIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 153
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 349 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 84%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 97%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1543 |
State average: | 1342 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 340 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000LAKESIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1651 |
State average from 1875 schools: | 1542 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 331 |
State average: | 313 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1666 |
State average: | 1546 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1502 |
State average: | 1397 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 164
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1775 |
State average from 1873 schools: | 1629 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 332 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1808 |
State average: | 1632 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006LAKESIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1692 |
State average: | 1532 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 116
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 326 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1597 |
State average: | 1413 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 364 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1618 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 1525 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500LAKESIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 337 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1627 |
State average: | 1528 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1533 |
State average: | 1414 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 94
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1769 |
State average from 1872 schools: | 1647 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500LAKESIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 354 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1791 |
State average: | 1649 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1710 |
State average: | 1519 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 81
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 168
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 656 |
State average from 1891 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR: 78
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 173
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 655 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 642 |
Median NPR: 72
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 184
Mean Scale ScoreLAKESIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 686 |
State average from 1870 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR: 85
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 168
Mean Scale ScoreLAKESIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 658 |
State average from 1891 schools: | 632 |
Median NPR: 84
Number Sense (max 14): 12
Operations (max 11): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 9
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 173
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 670 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 652 |
Median NPR: 85
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 184
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 686 |
State average from 1870 schools: | 663 |
Median NPR: 86
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 175
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 335 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 79%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 14
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 93%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Pembroke Pines, FL
- Lakeside Elementary School in Pembroke Pines, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: