City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 37.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Terrace Community Middle School (14.7 miles): | 92 |
| Bartels Middle School (18.2 miles): | 69 |
| Jennings Middle School (13.9 miles): | 53 |
| Lawton Chiles Middle Academy School (9.4 miles): | 43 |
| Marshall Middle School: | 37 |
| Rosabelle W. Blake Academy School (8.7 miles): | 35 |
| Hospital/Homebound/Homebased Programs School (19.0 miles): | 21 |
| Polk Life And Learning Center School (18.5 miles): | 11 |
Marshall Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Hillsborough County: | 42 |
| Plant City: | 38 |
| Marshall Middle School: | 37 |
1
kim parrish
Aug 5, 2011 @ 8:20 pm
I was wondering if someone could inform me of who was the Male Dean there in the year of 1981?
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 29
School number: 2841
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: HILLSBOROUGH
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (813) 707-7385
Principal: Daphne Blanton
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status:
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 12
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 62
Senate District: 10
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 612 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 49% |
| State average from 612 schools: | 51% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 64% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 612 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 537 |
| State average from 613 schools: | 545 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 614 schools: | 56% |
Minority Rate
Region: 4| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 614 schools: | 49% |
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 866 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 866 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 251
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 779
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 55% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 779
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 436 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 436 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 131
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 395
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 395
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 88 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 88 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 82
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 82
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 303 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 303 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 71
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 263
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 263
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 641 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 641 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 161
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 565
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 565
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 148 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 148 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 23% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 119
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 119
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 191 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 191 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 63
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 20% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 171
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 25% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 171
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 92% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 49% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 542 |
| State average from 613 schools: | 553 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 52% |
Minority Rate
Region: 4| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 48% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 925 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 926 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 289
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 829
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 830
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 468 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 468 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 165
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 435
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 435
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 104 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 105 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 95
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 97
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 303 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 303 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 82
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 42% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 258
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 257
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 608 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 609 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 164
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 521
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 522
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 159 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 159 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 24% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 120
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 30% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 119
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 203 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 203 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 24% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 178
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 26% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 178
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 603 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 603 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 603 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 36% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains
| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 62% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 65% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 509 |
| State average from 602 schools: | 543 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 604 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 605 schools: | 49% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 605 schools: | 48% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 951 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 951 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 291
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 863
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 864
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 489 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 489 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 147
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 453
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 452
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 129 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 129 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 57
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 36% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 118
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 37% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 120
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 291 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 291 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 76
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 39% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 256
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 44% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 256
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 575 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 576 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 174
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 41% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 505
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 506
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 169 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 169 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 27% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 143
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 34% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 143
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 197 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 197 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 20% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 184
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 25% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 184
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 94% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 91% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 538 schools: | 44% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 61% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
| Here: | 513 |
| State average from 539 schools: | 523 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 541 schools: | 49% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 542 schools: | 53% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 974 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 978 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 521 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 522 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 97% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 138 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 141 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 282 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 282 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 95% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 567 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 570 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 95% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 40% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 144 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 144 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 31% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 37% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 190 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 192 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 19% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 27% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 63% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 89% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 72% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 433 |
| State average from 526 schools: | 425 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 99% |
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 525 schools: | 50% |
Minority Rate
| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 45% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 52% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 894 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 895 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 95% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 487 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 488 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 97% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 138 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 138 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 36% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 41% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 235 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 235 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 95% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 39% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 553 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 554 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 127 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 127 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 23% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 34% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 185 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 186 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 34% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 55% |
| State average from 505 schools: | 59% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 62% |
| State average from 505 schools: | 60% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 506 schools: | 83% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 505 schools: | 61% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 505 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 505 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 392 |
| State average from 506 schools: | 397 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 506 schools: | 99% |
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 506 schools: | 51% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 44% |
| State average from 506 schools: | 50% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1629 |
| State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 297 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 56% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1719 |
| State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 300 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 20% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 56% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 15 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1856 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 304 |
| State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 3% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 48% |
| State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 307 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 2% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 39% |
| State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1648 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 304 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 15% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 47% |
| State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1763 |
| State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 300 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 48% |
| State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1891 |
| State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 319 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 45% |
| State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 10% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 66% |
| State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1614 |
| State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%| Here: | 294 |
| State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1738 |
| State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%| Here: | 304 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1861 |
| State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| Here: | 305 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%| Here: | 306 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1615 |
| State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%| Here: | 296 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1780 |
| State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%| Here: | 304 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1899 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| Here: | 321 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 306
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 5 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 10%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 93%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1663 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 303 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1749 |
| State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%| Here: | 306 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1795 |
| State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 291 |
| State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%| Here: | 286 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1655 |
| State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%| Here: | 305 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1818 |
| State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 313 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1865 |
| State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| Here: | 313 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 308 |
| State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 670 |
| State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 62 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 323 |
| State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 679 |
| State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 65 |
| State average: | 66 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 12 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 315 |
| State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 679 |
| State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Median NPR
| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 56 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 12 |
| State average: | 12 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 10 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 310
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 25%| Here: | 293 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 45%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 93%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1665 |
| State average from 878 schools: | 1661 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%| Here: | 303 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1664 |
| State average: | 1663 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 68| Here: | 1596 |
| State average: | 1592 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1681 |
| State average from 808 schools: | 1746 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%| Here: | 293 |
| State average: | 305 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1693 |
| State average: | 1743 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 67| Here: | 1627 |
| State average: | 1668 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1833 |
| State average from 819 schools: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%| Here: | 299 |
| State average: | 294 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1835 |
| State average: | 1807 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 85| Here: | 1750 |
| State average: | 1738 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%| Here: | 303 |
| State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1653 |
| State average from 873 schools: | 1641 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 305 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1654 |
| State average: | 1645 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 12| Here: | 1642 |
| State average: | 1620 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1795 |
| State average from 804 schools: | 1777 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%| Here: | 308 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1810 |
| State average: | 1774 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 149| Here: | 1661 |
| State average: | 1645 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1893 |
| State average from 815 schools: | 1851 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%| Here: | 320 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1894 |
| State average: | 1845 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 95| Here: | 1799 |
| State average: | 1755 |
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 336
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 67| Here: | 675 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 671 |
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 307
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 55| Here: | 668 |
| State average from 796 schools: | 675 |
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 311
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 67| Here: | 691 |
| State average from 810 schools: | 685 |
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 336
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 66| MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 672 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 669 |
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 307
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 69| Here: | 684 |
| State average from 796 schools: | 685 |
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 311
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 74| Here: | 704 |
| State average from 810 schools: | 698 |
Number Sense (max 9): 7
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 309
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 24%| Here: | 297 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 51%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 89%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.