Miami Community Charter Middle School in Florida City, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 26.

101 SW REDLAND RD
Florida City, FL 33034

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Herbert A. Ammons Middle School (11.5 miles):

98
Palmetto Middle School (18.1 miles):

79
Winston Park K-8 Center School (18.1 miles):

74
Miami Palmetto Senior High School (18.5 miles):

60
Centennial Middle School (13.4 miles):

47
Miami Sunset Senior High School (18.4 miles):

31
Miami Community Charter Middle School:

26
Lawrence Academy School (0.3 miles):

17
Miami Community Charter Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Miami-Dade County:

45
Florida City:

28
Miami Community Charter Middle:

26

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (305) 245-2552 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 6048
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 245-2527
Principal: Jacqueline Sera-Sirven
Regular charter school.
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Title 1 school not in need of improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 25
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 119
Senate District: 39
School Web Address: www.miamicommunitycharterschool.com

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
MIAMI COMMUNITY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

64%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

75%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

97%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

17%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

84%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

70%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

97%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
MIAMI COMMUNITY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

574
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

97%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: C

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

89%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

96%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 100 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 100 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 82 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 82 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 75

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 75
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 89 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 89 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

56%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

61%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

39%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

86%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
MIAMI COMMUNITY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

80%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

77%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

576
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: C

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

47%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

97%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

46%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

49%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

39%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

50%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

48%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

70%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

465
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

94%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

96%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (98%)

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MIAMI COMMUNITY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (98%)

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (98%)

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1702
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MIAMI COMMUNITY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

310
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

40%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

66%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1770
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

17%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

17%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

59%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1724
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

38%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

42%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
MIAMI COMMUNITY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

42%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
MIAMI COMMUNITY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

280
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

33%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

54%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
MIAMI COMMUNITY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

13%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1783
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

28%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

72%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
MIAMI COMMUNITY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1874
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

3%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

45%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

24%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

76%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1867
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

17%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

17%
State average:

17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

54%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1688
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1688
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1890
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1800
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1852
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MIAMI COMMUNITY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

322
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1882
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 25
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

5
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 16%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 100%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MIAMI COMMUNITY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1560
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1712
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MIAMI COMMUNITY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

299
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1716
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MIAMI COMMUNITY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1772
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

24
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

659
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

52
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
MIAMI COMMUNITY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

27
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

672
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

58
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
MIAMI COMMUNITY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6
State average:

6

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Florida City, FL
  5. Miami Community Charter Middle School in Florida City, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.