Miami Jackson Senior High School in Miami, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 3.

1751 NW 36TH ST
Miami, FL 33142

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Mast Academy School (6.1 miles):

94
International Studies Charter High School (3.2 miles):

67
South Pines Academy School (13.1 miles):

48
Sunset Heights Charter (Inactive 10/02) School (8.8 miles):

33
South Miami Senior High School (8.0 miles):

20
School For Applied Technology (1.1 miles):

7
Miami Jackson Senior High School:

3
Corporate Academy North School (1.1 miles):

1
Miami Jackson Senior High School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Miami-Dade County:

45
Miami:

44
Miami Jackson Senior High School:

3

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (305) 634-2621 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 7341
School type: Senior High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 634-7477
Magnet Program.
Principal: Julian Cazanas, Jr
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status:
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 18
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 109
Senate District: 36
School Web Address: http://generals.dadeschools.net/

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

16%
State average from 451 schools:

62%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

55%
State average from 451 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

83%
State average from 452 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

13%
State average from 451 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

38%
State average from 452 schools:

58%
Making Math Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 449 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

45%
State average from 452 schools:

52%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

82%
State average from 452 schools:

67%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

409
State average from 452 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 450 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: Pending

Grade in 2009: F

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: F

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: F

Grade in 2003: F

Grade in 2002: F

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 119999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

88%
State average from 454 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

100%
State average from 454 schools:

47%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 613 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 611 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 249
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 537
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 511

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 536
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 510
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 237 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 236 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 84
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 214
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 200

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 215
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 201
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 373 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 372 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 164
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 321
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 310

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 319
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 308
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 533 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 532 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 207
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 466
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 449

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 466
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 450
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 103 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 51
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 69
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 69
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 75 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 75 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 62
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

16%
State average from 443 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

46%
State average from 440 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

72%
State average from 443 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

16%
State average from 443 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

41%
State average from 441 schools:

59%
Making Math Gains
Here:

72%
State average from 442 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

58%
State average from 442 schools:

56%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

69%
State average from 441 schools:

66%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

390
State average from 441 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 448 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: F

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: F

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: F

Grade in 2003: F

Grade in 2002: F

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

78%
State average from 446 schools:

46%
Minority Rate
Here:

100%
State average from 451 schools:

45%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 679 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 679 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 333
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 602
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 578

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 602
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 577
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 258 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 258 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 133
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 234
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 226

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 232
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 224
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 416 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 416 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 198
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 364
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 348

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 366
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 349
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 542 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 542 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 260
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 482
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 462

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 482
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 461
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 138 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 137 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 66
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 96

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 101
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 97
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

15%
State average from 425 schools:

61%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

45%
State average from 425 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

84%
State average from 425 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

11%
State average from 425 schools:

45%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

41%
State average from 425 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

75%
State average from 425 schools:

74%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

56%
State average from 425 schools:

55%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

80%
State average from 425 schools:

71%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

407
State average from 425 schools:

526
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 425 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: F

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: F

Grade in 2003: F

Grade in 2002: F

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

75%
State average from 425 schools:

42%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 425 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 793 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 795 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 369
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 729
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 671

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 732
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 675
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 315 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 317 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 140
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 296
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 284

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 298
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 286
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 469 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 469 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 226
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 426
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 380

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 427
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 382
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 614 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 616 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 278
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 565
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 519

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 568
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 523
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 138 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 138 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 126
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 126
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 93
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 118 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 119 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 51
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 99

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 110
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 101
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

13%
State average from 370 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

36%
State average from 370 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

75%
State average from 370 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

13%
State average from 370 schools:

41%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

44%
State average from 370 schools:

52%
Making Math Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 370 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

70%
State average from 370 schools:

49%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

76%
State average from 370 schools:

67%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

397
State average from 370 schools:

482
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 370 schools:

97%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: F

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: F

Grade in 2003: F

Grade in 2002: F

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

67%
State average from 372 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 372 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 835 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 834 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 383
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 764
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 764
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 352 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 351 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 179
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 319
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 320
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 473 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 473 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 200
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 436
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 435
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 569 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 568 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 253
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 520
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 520
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 161 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 160 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 140
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 139
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 119 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 120 (93%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 52
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 107
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

12%
State average from 360 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

28%
State average from 361 schools:

68%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

65%
State average from 361 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

44%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Making Math Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 361 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

58%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

272
State average from 361 schools:

374
Percent Tested
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

97%
State average from 361 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: F

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: F

Grade in 2003: F

Grade in 2002: F

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

70%
State average from 362 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 362 schools:

47%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 907 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 904 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 380
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 835
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 826
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 416 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 415 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 178

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 383
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 379
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 487 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 485 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 202

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 448
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 443
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 621 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 622 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 253

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 574
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 571
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 193 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 189 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 74
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 174
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 167
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 114 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 114 (94%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 34
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 104
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 103
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

8%
State average from 348 schools:

42%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

31%
State average from 348 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

80%
State average from 348 schools:

84%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

41%
State average from 348 schools:

51%
Making Math Gains
Here:

72%
State average from 348 schools:

73%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 348 schools:

53%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

289
State average from 348 schools:

371
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 348 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: F

Grade in 2003: F

Grade in 2002: F

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

77%
State average from 347 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

98%
State average from 348 schools:

45%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1753
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

281
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

49%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

14%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

18%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

9
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1738
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

26%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

62%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

6%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

1%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

9%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

273
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

52%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

36%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

11%
State average:

30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

12%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

1870
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

24%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

9%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

1%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

43%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1917
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

307
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

66%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

51%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1752
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

280
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1723
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

262
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 72%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1835
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1873
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

296
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 351
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 62%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

1680
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

1732
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

264
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 65%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

263
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1806
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1901
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

303
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

394
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

667
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

35
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

6
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

400
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

688
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

47
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

7
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 400
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

273
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 32%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 76%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1722
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 81%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1749
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

1640
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 109

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1642
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

248
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 76%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 9
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1650
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1646
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1801
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

266
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 81%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1822
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1701
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 120

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

1820
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

1824
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1782
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 42

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 407
Mean Scale Score
Here:

669
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 37
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 414
Mean Scale Score
Here:

672
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 30
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 406
Mean Scale Score
Here:

687
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 50
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 414
Mean Scale Score
Here:

690
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 36
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 399
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

242
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 17%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
MIAMI JACKSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 65%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 47%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Miami, FL
  5. Miami Jackson Senior High School in Miami, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.