City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 5.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Mast Academy School (7.6 miles): | 94 |
| International Studies Charter High School (5.3 miles): | 67 |
| Dr Michael M. Krop Senior High School (9.6 miles): | 52 |
| Mcarthur High School (11.8 miles): | 33 |
| South Miami Senior High School (10.0 miles): | 20 |
| Merrick Educational Center School (6.3 miles): | 11 |
| Miami Northwestern Senior High School: | 5 |
| International Of Broward School (13.7 miles): | 2 |
Miami Northwestern Senior High School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Miami-Dade County: | 45 |
| Miami: | 44 |
| Miami Northwestern Senior High: | 5 |
1
Debbie Williams
Jul 31, 2010 @ 1:13 pm
What is the dress code for Northwestern? I know about the shirts but what about the pants for boys? Is it jeams, black, or tan pants
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 13
School number: 7411
School type: Senior High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 691-4955
Magnet Program.
Principal: Charles E Hankerson
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Year 4 in Need of Improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 17
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 109
Senate District: 33
School Web Address: http://northwestern.dadeschools.net/
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 19% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 62% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 86% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 17% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 37% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 58% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 449 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 52% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 406 |
| State average from 452 schools: | 522 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 450 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: Pending
Grade in 2009: F
Grade in 2008: D
Grade in 2007: F
Grade in 2006: D
Grade in 2005: D
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: F
Grade in 2002: F
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 119999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 454 schools: | 50% |
Minority Rate
Region: 5| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 454 schools: | 47% |
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 780 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 779 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 348
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 19% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 724
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 725
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 709 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 708 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 319
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 18% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 662
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 662
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 644 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 644 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 276
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 19% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 599
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 602
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 91 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 91 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 21% |
| State average from 443 schools: | 60% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 440 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| MIAMI NORTHWESTERN SENIOR HIGH: | 75% |
| State average from 443 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 7% |
| State average from 443 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 38% |
| State average from 441 schools: | 59% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 442 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 442 schools: | 56% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 441 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| MIAMI NORTHWESTERN SENIOR HIGH: | 377 |
| State average from 441 schools: | 522 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 448 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: F
Grade in 2008: D
Grade in 2007: F
Grade in 2006: D
Grade in 2005: D
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: F
Grade in 2002: F
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 446 schools: | 46% |
Minority Rate
Region: 5| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 45% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 938 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 934 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| MIAMI NORTHWESTERN SENIOR HIGH: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 21% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 832
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 830
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 883 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 879 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 20% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 796
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 794
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 694 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 691 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 21% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 620
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| MIAMI NORTHWESTERN SENIOR HIGH: | 48% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 619
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 148 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 147 (95%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 24% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 116
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 115
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 17% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 61% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| MIAMI NORTHWESTERN SENIOR HIGH: | 84% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 13% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 45% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 61% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 74% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 55% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 71% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 407 |
| State average from 425 schools: | 526 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: D
Grade in 2007: F
Grade in 2006: D
Grade in 2005: D
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: F
Grade in 2002: F
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 42% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 44% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1134 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1131 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 16% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1021
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 39% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1012
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1070 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1067 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 16% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 971
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| MIAMI NORTHWESTERN SENIOR HIGH: | 40% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 960
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 777 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 776 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 15% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 700
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 38% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 699
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 208 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 208 (95%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 13% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 169
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 13% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 166
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 13% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 45% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 36% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 84% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 9% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 41% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 33% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 52% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 49% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
| Here: | 334 |
| State average from 370 schools: | 482 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: NO| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 97% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: F
Grade in 2006: D
Grade in 2005: D
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: F
Grade in 2002: F
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 372 schools: | 38% |
Minority Rate
| MIAMI NORTHWESTERN SENIOR HIGH: | 99% |
| State average from 372 schools: | 48% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1382 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1364 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| MIAMI NORTHWESTERN SENIOR HIGH: | 12% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 29% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1281 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1266 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 12% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 29% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 87 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (95%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 72
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 923 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 909 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 10% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 27% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 286 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 281 (94%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 7% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 6% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 15% |
| State average from 360 schools: | 45% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 37% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 68% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 83% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 53% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 53% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 290 |
| State average from 361 schools: | 374 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: NO| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 98% |
Grade in 2006: D
Grade in 2005: D
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: F
Grade in 2002: F
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| MIAMI NORTHWESTERN SENIOR HIGH: | 67% |
| State average from 362 schools: | 38% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 362 schools: | 47% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1404 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1382 (96%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 13% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 32% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1304 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1283 (96%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 13% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 31% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 90 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 89 (91%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 18% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 957 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 942 (96%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 12% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 30% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 246 (89%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 244 (88%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 215
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 214
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 14% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 42% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 67% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 84% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 42% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 51% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 73% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 53% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 297 |
| State average from 348 schools: | 371 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%| Here: | 97% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 98% |
Grade in 2005: D
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: F
Grade in 2002: F
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| MIAMI NORTHWESTERN SENIOR HIGH: | 87% |
| State average from 347 schools: | 38% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 45% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1775 |
| State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 285 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 43% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 12% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 11 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| MIAMI NORTHWESTERN SENIOR HIGH: | 1819 |
| State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 280 |
| State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 54% |
| State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 12% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 15 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 275 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 55% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 5% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| MIAMI NORTHWESTERN SENIOR HIGH: | 14% |
| State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1872 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 287 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| MIAMI NORTHWESTERN SENIOR HIGH: | 2% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 46% |
| State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| MIAMI NORTHWESTERN SENIOR HIGH: | 1934 |
| State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 311 |
| State average: | 326 |
Percent Passing
| Here: | 72% |
| State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 54% |
| State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1794 |
| State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%| Here: | 288 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1769 |
| State average: | 1921 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 28%| Here: | 271 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 69%| Here: | 249 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1863 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%| Here: | 284 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1919 |
| State average: | 1972 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 64%| Here: | 307 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 478
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Unscore - Combined: 1| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 72%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| MIAMI NORTHWESTERN SENIOR HIGH: | 1746 |
| State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%| Here: | 279 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1726 |
| State average: | 1935 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 24%| Here: | 263 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%| Here: | 266 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1836 |
| State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%| Here: | 276 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1884 |
| State average: | 1984 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 59%| MIAMI NORTHWESTERN SENIOR HIGH: | 299 |
| State average: | 323 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 562 |
| State average: | 273 |
Mean Scale Score
| MIAMI NORTHWESTERN SENIOR HIGH: | 677 |
| State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Median NPR
| MIAMI NORTHWESTERN SENIOR HIGH: | 45 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| MIAMI NORTHWESTERN SENIOR HIGH: | 11 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 11 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 11 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 482 |
| State average: | 237 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 695 |
| State average from 2096 schools: | 709 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 53 |
| State average: | 65 |
Literary (max 18)
| MIAMI NORTHWESTERN SENIOR HIGH: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 10 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 512
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 31%| Here: | 273 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 33%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 77%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1668 |
| State average from 612 schools: | 1849 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%| Here: | 265 |
| State average: | 298 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1676 |
| State average: | 1837 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 36| Here: | 1640 |
| State average: | 1779 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1686 |
| State average from 573 schools: | 1879 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 21%| Here: | 256 |
| State average: | 291 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 10
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1692 |
| State average: | 1873 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -29| Here: | 1721 |
| State average: | 1876 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 65%| Here: | 251 |
| State average: | 295 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 5
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1776 |
| State average from 613 schools: | 1884 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%| Here: | 259 |
| State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| MIAMI NORTHWESTERN SENIOR HIGH: | 1783 |
| State average: | 1869 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 69| Here: | 1714 |
| State average: | 1821 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1843 |
| State average from 581 schools: | 1950 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 49%| MIAMI NORTHWESTERN SENIOR HIGH: | 289 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1846 |
| State average: | 1939 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 28| Here: | 1818 |
| State average: | 1901 |
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 661
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 39| Here: | 671 |
| State average from 597 schools: | 696 |
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 655
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 38| Here: | 679 |
| State average from 575 schools: | 695 |
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 657
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 48| Here: | 686 |
| State average from 597 schools: | 708 |
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 652
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 42| Here: | 694 |
| State average from 575 schools: | 710 |
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 663
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 48%| MIAMI NORTHWESTERN SENIOR HIGH: | 249 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 22%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 5%| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 66%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 48%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.