City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
70.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Oakleaf School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:| Florida: | 45 |
| Clay County: | 54 |
| Orange Park: | 65 |
| Oakleaf School: | 70 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (904) 213-5500 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 10
School number: 611
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: CLAY
Grade range: GRADES KINDERGARTEN TO 8
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (904) 291-2549
Principal: Larry Davis
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 79 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 79 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 79 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 79 schools: | 52% |
Making Reading Gains | Here: | 70% |
| State average from 79 schools: | 64% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 78 schools: | 67% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading | Here: | 58% |
| State average from 79 schools: | 61% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 60% |
| State average from 79 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)| Here: | 575 |
| State average from 79 schools: | 530 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 78 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 119999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 80 schools: | 54% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 80 schools: | 47% |
Region: 2
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 336 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 336 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 98
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 316
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 316
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 200 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 200 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 190
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 190
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 165 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 165 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 155
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 155
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 74 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 74 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 74 schools: | 87% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 75% |
| State average from 74 schools: | 52% |
Making Reading Gains | Here: | 80% |
| State average from 74 schools: | 69% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 74 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading | OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 76% |
| State average from 74 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 74 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)| Here: | 661 |
| State average from 74 schools: | 556 |
Percent Tested| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 100% |
| State average from 74 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 74 schools: | 47% |
Minority Rate| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 40% |
| State average from 74 schools: | 44% |
Region: 3
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 287 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 288 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 93
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 258
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 256
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 170 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 171 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 57
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 156
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 155
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 121 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 121 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 103
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 101
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 73 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 73 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 73 schools: | 81% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 64% |
| State average from 73 schools: | 47% |
Making Reading Gains | Here: | 71% |
| State average from 73 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 59% |
| State average from 73 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading | Here: | 67% |
| State average from 73 schools: | 63% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 73 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 585 |
| State average from 73 schools: | 537 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 73 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 39% |
| State average from 72 schools: | 45% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 38% |
| State average from 73 schools: | 43% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 291 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 290 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 266
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 264
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 178 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 178 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 165
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 164
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 119 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 118 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 101
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 99
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 75% |
| State average from 66 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 66 schools: | 66% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 66 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 66 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 66 schools: | 67% |
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
Making Math Gains| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 66 schools: | 65% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 66 schools: | 68% |
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 66 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns| Here: | 544 |
| State average from 66 schools: | 534 |
Percent Tested| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 100% |
| State average from 66 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 19% |
| State average from 66 schools: | 44% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 44% |
| State average from 66 schools: | 49% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1198 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1198 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 97% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 632 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 632 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 98% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 327 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 327 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 130 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 130 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 63% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 68 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 68 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 253 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 253 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 118 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 118 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 95% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 38% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1502 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 333 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 40% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 86% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1671 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 335 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 79% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1753 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 329 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 82% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1663 |
| State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 303 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 21% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 60% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1812 |
| State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 318 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 18% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 65% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1885 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 310 |
| State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 52% |
| State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 343 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 42% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 66% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 313 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 44% |
| State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1576 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 360 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 26% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 87% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1654 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 345 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 44% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 88% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1731 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 346 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 69% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1704 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 317 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 57% |
| State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1849 |
| State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 321 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 9% |
| State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 72% |
| State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1938 |
| State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 331 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 42% |
| State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 10% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 77% |
| State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1476 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 329 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1744 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 347 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 05%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 03%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 1732 |
| State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 325 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1663 |
| State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 303 |
| State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1764 |
| State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 309 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1888 |
| State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 311 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 340 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 310 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1612 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 368 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1728 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 362 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1757 |
| State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 352 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1683 |
| State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 312 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1841 |
| State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 319 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1914 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 325 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 96
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 508
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 5 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 10%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 95%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1537 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 339 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1641 |
| State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 330 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1739 |
| State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 326 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1672 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 304 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1760 |
| State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 308 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1863 |
| State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 305 |
| State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 334 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 305 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1572 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 359 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1636 |
| State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 341 |
| State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1740 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 348 |
| State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1700 |
| State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 316 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1838 |
| State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 318 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1931 |
| State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 329 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 647 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 72 |
| State average: | 61 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 658 |
| State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 106 |
| State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 679 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students| Here: | 577 |
| State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale Score| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 667 |
| State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Literary (max 18)| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 12 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 542 |
| State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 677 |
| State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Functional (max 18)| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 12 |
| State average: | 12 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students| Here: | 401 |
| State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 688 |
| State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 90
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 316 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 68%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 46%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 415
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 295 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 46%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1437 |
| State average: | 1342 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 323 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1623 |
| State average from 1875 schools: | 1542 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 327 |
| State average: | 313 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 73%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1612 |
| State average: | 1546 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1470 |
| State average: | 1397 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 142
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 1730 |
| State average from 1873 schools: | 1629 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 325 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 78%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1756 |
| State average: | 1632 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1653 |
| State average: | 1532 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 103
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1826 |
| State average from 878 schools: | 1661 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 332 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 72%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1826 |
| State average: | 1663 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 1707 |
| State average: | 1592 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 119
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1800 |
| State average from 808 schools: | 1746 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 315 |
| State average: | 305 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 73%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1811 |
| State average: | 1743 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1777 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 34
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1879 |
| State average from 819 schools: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 308 |
| State average: | 294 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 83%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1893 |
| State average: | 1807 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 1835 |
| State average: | 1738 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 58
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 320 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 299 |
| State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1413 |
| State average: | 1413 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 324 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1544 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 1525 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 320 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 72%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1547 |
| State average: | 1528 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1541 |
| State average: | 1414 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 6
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 1729 |
| State average from 1872 schools: | 1647 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 346 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 79%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1755 |
| State average: | 1649 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1653 |
| State average: | 1519 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 102
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1782 |
| State average from 873 schools: | 1641 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 335 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 72%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1777 |
| State average: | 1645 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1704 |
| State average: | 1620 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 73
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1847 |
| State average from 804 schools: | 1777 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 320 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 74%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1871 |
| State average: | 1774 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1771 |
| State average: | 1645 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 100
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1915 |
| State average from 815 schools: | 1851 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 325 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 84%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1930 |
| State average: | 1845 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1843 |
| State average: | 1755 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 87
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 165
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 647 |
| State average from 1891 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR: 72
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 153
Mean Scale Score| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 654 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 642 |
Median NPR: 71
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 154
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 678 |
| State average from 1870 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR: 81
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 148
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 689 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR: 78
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 305
Mean Scale Score| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 683 |
| State average from 796 schools: | 675 |
Median NPR: 69
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 280
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 696 |
| State average from 810 schools: | 685 |
Median NPR: 72
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 165
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 635 |
| State average from 1891 schools: | 632 |
Median NPR: 71
Number Sense (max 14): 11
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 153
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 658 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 652 |
Median NPR: 80
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 154
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 672 |
| State average from 1870 schools: | 663 |
Median NPR: 80
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 148
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 688 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 669 |
Median NPR: 79
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 9
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 305
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 700 |
| State average from 796 schools: | 685 |
Median NPR: 79
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 280
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 708 |
| State average from 810 schools: | 698 |
Median NPR: 77
Number Sense (max 9): 7
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 156
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 303 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 58%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 14
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 76%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 62%
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 278
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 286 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 39%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined| OAKLEAF SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 84%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 68%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Orange Park, FL
- Oakleaf School in Orange Park, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: