City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
54.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Olsen Middle School rating compared to average state and city schools ratings:Florida: | 45 |
Dania Beach: | 54 |
Olsen Middle School: | 54 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (754) 323-3800 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 6
School number: 471
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: BROWARD
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (754) 323-3885
Principal: Kim Flynn
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 20
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 100
Senate District: 31
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 89% |
State average from 613 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 86% |
State average from 612 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 96% |
State average from 613 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 72% |
State average from 612 schools: | 51% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 69% |
State average from 613 schools: | 64% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 67% |
State average from 612 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 62% |
State average from 613 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 53% |
State average from 613 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 594 |
State average from 613 schools: | 545 |
Percent TestedOLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 100% |
State average from 613 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 119999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 31% |
State average from 614 schools: | 56% |
Minority RateHere: | 19% |
State average from 614 schools: | 49% |
Region: 4
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 379 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 379 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 113
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 86% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 363
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 354
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 83% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 363
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 354
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 311 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 311 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 90
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 300
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 293
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 85% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 300
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 293
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 107 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 107 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 72% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 98
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 95
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 72% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 98
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 95
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 92% |
State average from 613 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in MathOLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 87% |
State average from 613 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 98% |
State average from 613 schools: | 92% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceOLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 69% |
State average from 613 schools: | 49% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 74% |
State average from 613 schools: | 66% |
Making Math GainsOLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 64% |
State average from 613 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 67% |
State average from 613 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathOLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 59% |
State average from 613 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 610 |
State average from 613 schools: | 553 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 613 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 26% |
State average from 613 schools: | 52% |
Minority RateHere: | 18% |
State average from 613 schools: | 48% |
Region: 4
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 388 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 388 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 132
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 380
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 370
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 380
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 370
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 320 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 320 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 111
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 90% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 314
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 305
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 86% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 314
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 305
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 107 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 107 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 76% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 101
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 97
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 72% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 101
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 97
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 94% |
State average from 603 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 93% |
State average from 603 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 95% |
State average from 603 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 83% |
State average from 602 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 63% |
State average from 602 schools: | 65% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 70% |
State average from 602 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 74% |
State average from 602 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 77% |
State average from 602 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 649 |
State average from 602 schools: | 543 |
Percent TestedOLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 100% |
State average from 604 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 19% |
State average from 605 schools: | 49% |
Minority RateHere: | 14% |
State average from 605 schools: | 48% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 390 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 390 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 132
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 91% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 378
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 372
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 90% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 378
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 372
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 334 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 334 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 111
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 93% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 324
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 320
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 324
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 320
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 77 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 77 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 82% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientOLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 75% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingOLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 55% |
State average from 539 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 55% |
State average from 539 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 85% |
State average from 539 schools: | 91% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 38% |
State average from 538 schools: | 44% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 57% |
State average from 539 schools: | 61% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 61% |
State average from 539 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 63% |
State average from 539 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 58% |
State average from 539 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsOLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 472 |
State average from 539 schools: | 523 |
Percent TestedHere: | 99% |
State average from 539 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 65% |
State average from 541 schools: | 49% |
Minority RateHere: | 63% |
State average from 542 schools: | 53% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1297 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1296 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 93% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 460
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientOLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 49% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1215
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 49% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1212
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 479 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 478 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 95% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 164
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 62% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 456
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 61% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 457
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 316 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 316 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 109
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientOLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 32% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 294
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 31% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 292
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 441 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 441 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 91% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 167
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 44% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 409
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 48% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 407
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 840 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 839 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 301
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 41% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 786
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 42% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 784
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 155 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 154 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 81% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 53
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 16% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 134
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 35% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 133
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 149 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 149 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 67% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 20% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 140
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 17% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 141
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 58% |
State average from 526 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 62% |
State average from 526 schools: | 63% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 87% |
State average from 526 schools: | 89% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 67% |
State average from 526 schools: | 66% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 74% |
State average from 526 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 71% |
State average from 526 schools: | 72% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere: | 419 |
State average from 526 schools: | 425 |
Percent TestedHere: | 98% |
State average from 526 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 65% |
State average from 525 schools: | 50% |
Minority RateHere: | 64% |
State average from 526 schools: | 52% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1399 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1398 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 95% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 523
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 51% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1306
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1302
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 513 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 510 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 95% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 201
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 63% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 487
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 69% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 483
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 328 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 329 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 93% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 130
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 34% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 305
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 38% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 304
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 478 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 479 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 95% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 163
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 48% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 442
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 50% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 443
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 74% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 79% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 898 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 899 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 95% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 320
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 44% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 830
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 49% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 828
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 186 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 186 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 89% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 63
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 29% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 163
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 40% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 163
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 158 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 160 (97%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 78% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 58
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 20% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 150
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 18% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 152
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 50% |
State average from 505 schools: | 59% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 56% |
State average from 505 schools: | 60% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 74% |
State average from 506 schools: | 83% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 61% |
State average from 505 schools: | 61% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 69% |
State average from 505 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 69% |
State average from 505 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsOLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 379 |
State average from 506 schools: | 397 |
Percent TestedHere: | 98% |
State average from 506 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 62% |
State average from 506 schools: | 51% |
Minority RateHere: | 60% |
State average from 506 schools: | 50% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1620 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 353 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 30% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 36% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 89% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 5 |
State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1737 |
State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 346 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 12% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 21% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 40% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 19% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 81% |
State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1811 |
State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 339 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 11% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 24% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 42% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 82% |
State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 17 |
State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1883 |
State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 342 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 27% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 44% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 85% |
State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1757 |
State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 307 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 22% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 22% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 29% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 19% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 56% |
State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1859 |
State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 304 |
State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 24% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 25% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 32% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 16% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 50% |
State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1962 |
State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 319 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 19% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 34% |
State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 28% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 13% |
State average: | 12% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 47% |
State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2001 |
State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 314 |
State average: | 302 |
Percent PassingOLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 62% |
State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 27% |
State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 33% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 20% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 13% |
State average: | 12% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 40% |
State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 346 |
State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 26% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 41% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 18% |
State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 68% |
State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 9 |
State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 296 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 32% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 28% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 33% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 40% |
State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 307 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 25% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 38% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 32% |
State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 37% |
State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1658 |
State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 377 |
State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 9% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 22% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 33% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 34% |
State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 89% |
State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1659 |
State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 346 |
State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 13% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 26% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 34% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 19% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 80% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1791 |
State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 359 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 16% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 21% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 33% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 23% |
State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 76% |
State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1833 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 347 |
State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 10% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 11% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 34% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 28% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 79% |
State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreOLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1781 |
State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 304 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 30% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 20% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 26% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 15% |
State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 10% |
State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveOLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 50% |
State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 4 |
State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1891 |
State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 319 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 16% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 22% |
State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 33% |
State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 20% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 10% |
State average: | 10% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 62% |
State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1961 |
State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 313 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 24% |
State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 37% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 22% |
State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 5OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 9% |
State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 67% |
State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2021 |
State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 332 |
State average: | 326 |
Percent PassingHere: | 87% |
State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 16% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 33% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 37% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 77% |
State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 8 |
State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 5 |
State average: | 5 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1622 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 353 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1725 |
State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 344 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 05%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1819 |
State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 340 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1931 |
State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 351 |
State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1770 |
State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 310 |
State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1848 |
State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 302 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreOLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1972 |
State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 321 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1942 |
State average: | 1921 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 303 |
State average: | 299 |
Percent Passing: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 338 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 295 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 292 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1612 |
State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 367 |
State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 34%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreOLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1692 |
State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 354 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1775 |
State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 355 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1827 |
State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 346 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1791 |
State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 306 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1884 |
State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 317 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1971 |
State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 316 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreOLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1971 |
State average: | 1972 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 320 |
State average: | 321 |
Percent Passing: 77%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 132
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedOLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 5 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 11%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 95%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 414
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 5 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 11%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 96%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 458
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 65%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1616 |
State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 352 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1742 |
State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 347 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 21
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1815 |
State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 340 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreOLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1856 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 337 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreOLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1735 |
State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 303 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1826 |
State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 297 |
State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreOLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1946 |
State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 316 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1970 |
State average: | 1935 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 308 |
State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 348 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 295 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 305 |
State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1646 |
State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 375 |
State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1704 |
State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 357 |
State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1793 |
State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 359 |
State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1813 |
State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 342 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1808 |
State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 311 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1888 |
State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 318 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1930 |
State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 304 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2005 |
State average: | 1984 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 328 |
State average: | 323 |
Percent Passing: 82%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 137 |
State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 657 |
State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 10 |
State average: | 9 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 10 |
State average: | 9 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 674 |
State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Median NPROLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 84 |
State average: | 69 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 122 |
State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 689 |
State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 16 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 138 |
State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 696 |
State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 10 |
State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 8 |
State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 433 |
State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 675 |
State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Literary (max 18)OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 14 |
State average: | 14 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 342 |
State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 679 |
State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 458 |
State average: | 273 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 692 |
State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Median NPROLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 60 |
State average: | 61 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 356 |
State average: | 237 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 710 |
State average from 2096 schools: | 709 |
Literary (max 18)OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 14 |
State average: | 14 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 134
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 362 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 84%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 10%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 339
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 294 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 46%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 89%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 454
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 292 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 47%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - CombinedOLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 4 |
State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 74%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1596 |
State average from 878 schools: | 1661 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 291 |
State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1598 |
State average: | 1663 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1542 |
State average: | 1592 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 56
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1721 |
State average from 808 schools: | 1746 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 300 |
State average: | 305 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1748 |
State average: | 1743 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1652 |
State average: | 1668 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 97
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1809 |
State average from 819 schools: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 294 |
State average: | 294 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1820 |
State average: | 1807 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1753 |
State average: | 1738 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 68
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 287 |
State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1616 |
State average from 873 schools: | 1641 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 296 |
State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1626 |
State average: | 1645 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1633 |
State average: | 1620 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -7
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1778 |
State average from 804 schools: | 1777 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 303 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1794 |
State average: | 1774 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006OLSEN MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1678 |
State average: | 1645 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 117
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1842 |
State average from 815 schools: | 1851 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 307 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1854 |
State average: | 1845 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1790 |
State average: | 1755 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 63
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 438
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 662 |
State average from 874 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR: 55
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 367
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 670 |
State average from 796 schools: | 675 |
Median NPR: 57
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 472
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 684 |
State average from 810 schools: | 685 |
Median NPR: 61
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 437
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 664 |
State average from 874 schools: | 669 |
Median NPR: 59
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 368
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 686 |
State average from 796 schools: | 685 |
Median NPR: 69
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 472
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 697 |
State average from 810 schools: | 698 |
Median NPR: 69
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 481
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 274 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 35%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 80%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 68%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Dania Beach, FL
- Olsen Middle School in Dania Beach, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: