City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 82.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Bay Haven Charter Academy School (4.6 miles): | 88 |
| Shaw Adult Center School: | 82 |
| Tyndall Elementary School (3.2 miles): | 78 |
| Bozeman School (6.5 miles): | 60 |
| Hiland Park Elementary School (3.8 miles): | 54 |
| West Bay Elementary School (17.9 miles): | 46 |
| Callaway Elementary School (2.4 miles): | 35 |
| Margaret K. Lewis Exceptional School (5.2 miles): | 19 |
| Bay County Superintendent's Office School (4.2 miles): | 1 |
Shaw Adult Center School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Bay County: | 42 |
| Panama City: | 39 |
| Shaw Adult Center School: | 82 |
1
Mary Bailey
Apr 18, 2011 @ 10:10 am
i am looking for my diploma. i took 3 subjects to graduate back in 1974-75. Can anyone help me?
2
jammie
Jul 25, 2011 @ 5:17 pm
need to know how much it will cost to take the ged test.What nights are available.
3
Carol A. Swarts
Jan 7, 2016 @ 12:12 pm
I am looking for my diploma from 1974. I attended the Callaway School at night to earn my high school credits.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 3
School number: 311
School type: Adult
District Name: BAY
Grade range: ADULT
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (850) 872-7587
Principal: Mike Heptinstall
The function/setting of the school: Adult Education
The main educational program offered at the school: Adult
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 2
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 6
Senate District: 4
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 92% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 87% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 52% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 63% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 59% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 65% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 670 |
| State average from 133 schools: | 541 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 100% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 119999: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 31% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 52% |
Minority Rate
Region: 1| Here: | 12% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 43% |
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (94%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 34% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 26% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 26% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 26% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 95% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 95% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 91% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 82% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 51% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 67% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 65% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 76% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 674 |
| State average from 133 schools: | 557 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 31% |
| State average from 132 schools: | 48% |
Minority Rate
Region: 1| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 11% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 42% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (93%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 18% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 33% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 18% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 33% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 18% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 33% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 131 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 131 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 90% |
| State average from 131 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 131 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 131 schools: | 64% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 131 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 131 schools: | 61% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 131 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 666 |
| State average from 131 schools: | 540 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 131 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 25% |
| State average from 131 schools: | 47% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 14% |
| State average from 131 schools: | 44% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (93%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 26% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 22% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 26% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 22% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 26% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 22% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1626 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 354 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 47% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 92% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 20 |
| State average: | 17 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1837 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 363 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 4% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 44% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 95% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 23 |
| State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1804 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 338 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 41% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 87% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 4 |
| State average: | 3 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 17 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 10 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1918 |
| State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 349 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 35% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 85% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1990 |
| State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 352 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 85% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 19 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 1516 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 232 |
| State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 78% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 2 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 1754 |
| State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 281 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 50% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 12% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 11 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 356 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 42% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 4% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 74% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 10 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 245 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 65% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 31% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 6 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1674 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 381 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 48% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 96% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1759 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 369 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 41% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 94% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 9 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1804 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 362 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 28% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 45% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 88% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 8 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 1865 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 354 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 28% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 79% |
| State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1948 |
| State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 346 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 84% |
| State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 7 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1645 |
| State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 257 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 56% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 10% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 22% |
| State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1750 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 251 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 40% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 47% |
| State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 21% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1649 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%| Here: | 357 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 20
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1760 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 02%| Here: | 350 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 08%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1841 |
| State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%| Here: | 344 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1907 |
| State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%| Here: | 347 |
| State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1988 |
| State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%| Here: | 351 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1540 |
| State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%| Here: | 237 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1735 |
| State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%| Here: | 277 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1641 |
| State average: | 1921 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 8%| Here: | 247 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 357 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 80%| Here: | 204 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1684 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%| Here: | 383 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 37%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1742 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%| Here: | 366 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1816 |
| State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%| Here: | 364 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 1850 |
| State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%| Here: | 351 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1964 |
| State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%| Here: | 349 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1611 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%| Here: | 248 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1777 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%| Here: | 259 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1846 |
| State average: | 1972 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 67%| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 290 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 142
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 11%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 93%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 16
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 6%| Here: | 3 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 38%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 13
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 23%| Here: | 3 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 23%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1585 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%| Here: | 347 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1821 |
| State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%| Here: | 360 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 22
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1861 |
| State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%| Here: | 348 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1896 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%| Here: | 345 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1992 |
| State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%| Here: | 352 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1625 |
| State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%| Here: | 255 |
| State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1702 |
| State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 65%| Here: | 271 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%| Here: | 353 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%| Here: | 236 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1581 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%| Here: | 361 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 96%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1746 |
| State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%| Here: | 366 |
| State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 1831 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%| Here: | 367 |
| State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1840 |
| State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%| Here: | 349 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1967 |
| State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%| Here: | 350 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1595 |
| State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%| Here: | 244 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1753 |
| State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%| Here: | 252 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 135 |
| State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 657 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 80 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 17 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 132 |
| State average: | 97 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 674 |
| State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 84 |
| State average: | 69 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 11 |
| State average: | 10 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 16 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 8 |
Strategies (max 10)
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 132 |
| State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale Score
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 689 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 87 |
| State average: | 71 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 384 |
| State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 699 |
| State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 84 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 17 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 358 |
| State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 714 |
| State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 88 |
| State average: | 66 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 12 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 21 |
| State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 645 |
| State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 25 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 12 |
Informational (max 18)
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 8 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 10 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| SHAW ADULT CENTER: | 9 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 10 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 17 |
| State average: | 273 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 662 |
| State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 31 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 11 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 11 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 237 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 132
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 4%| Here: | 355 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 87%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 14
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 89%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 12
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 83%| Here: | 210 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 8%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 8%| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 42%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 11
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 91%| Here: | 173 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 9%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 45%| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.