City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 54.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Bevis Elementary School (14.6 miles): | 91 |
| Seffner Elementary School (10.0 miles): | 65 |
| Wesley Chapel Elementary School (18.6 miles): | 55 |
| Shiloh Elementary Charter School: | 54 |
| North Lakeland Elementary Of Choice School (11.0 miles): | 46 |
| Mintz Elementary School (13.6 miles): | 38 |
| Combee Elementary School (14.2 miles): | 29 |
| Sheehy Elementary School (17.3 miles): | 18 |
Shiloh Elementary Charter School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Hillsborough County: | 42 |
| Plant City: | 38 |
| Shiloh Elementary Charter School: | 54 |
1
Reina
Aug 16, 2012 @ 4:16 pm
My son is 3 years old and i am a singel mother and not sure how to enroll my son to starter school anbd needs some advice and help if possible..thank you
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 29
School number: 6637
School type: Elementary
District Name: HILLSBOROUGH
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (813) 707-8060
Principal: Shirley Sanchez
Regular charter school.
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 9
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 62
Senate District: 10
School Web Address: shilohcharterschool.org
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 40% |
| State average from 733 schools: | 53% |
Making Reading Gains
| SHILOH ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL: | 71% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 64% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 733 schools: | 67% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 58% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 539 |
| State average from 734 schools: | 543 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 733 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 31% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 57% |
Minority Rate
Region: 4| Here: | 13% |
| State average from 735 schools: | 46% |
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 141 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 140 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 53
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 125
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 124
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 121 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 120 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 110
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 109
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 735 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 36% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 51% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 67% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 735 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| SHILOH ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL: | 39% |
| State average from 735 schools: | 65% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 435 |
| State average from 734 schools: | 557 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| SHILOH ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL: | 100% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: NO
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 21% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 53% |
Minority Rate
Region: 4| Here: | 11% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 45% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 194 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 194 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 174
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 174
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 174 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 174 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 157
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 157
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 711 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 711 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 711 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 711 schools: | 47% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 711 schools: | 65% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 711 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| SHILOH ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL: | 64% |
| State average from 711 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 711 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 556 |
| State average from 711 schools: | 544 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 711 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 16% |
| State average from 711 schools: | 50% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 11% |
| State average from 711 schools: | 44% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| SHILOH ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 62
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 62
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1488 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| SHILOH ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL: | 331 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 42% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| SHILOH ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL: | 12% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 81% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| SHILOH ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL: | 18 |
| State average: | 17 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1607 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 324 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 44% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| SHILOH ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL: | 79% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 19 |
| State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| SHILOH ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1572 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 296 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 51% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 67% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 3 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 312 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| SHILOH ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL: | 26% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| SHILOH ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL: | 9% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 4% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 40% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1491 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 341 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 40% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 84% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1584 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 329 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| SHILOH ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL: | 4% |
| State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 44% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| SHILOH ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL: | 4% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 78% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| SHILOH ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1672 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 334 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 62% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| SHILOH ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1409 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%| Here: | 318 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1538 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| Here: | 312 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 07%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1553 |
| State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| Here: | 293 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1822 |
| State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%| Here: | 331 |
| State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%| Here: | 296 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| SHILOH ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL: | 1545 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%| Here: | 353 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| SHILOH ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL: | 1497 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%| Here: | 309 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1542 |
| State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%| Here: | 306 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1778 |
| State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| Here: | 334 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 44
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 64%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1423 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%| Here: | 320 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1618 |
| State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%| Here: | 326 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1697 |
| State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%| Here: | 319 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%| Here: | 297 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1472 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%| Here: | 337 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1604 |
| State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%| Here: | 334 |
| State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1720 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%| Here: | 344 |
| State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 22 |
| State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 631 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 59 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| SHILOH ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 27 |
| State average: | 97 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 658 |
| State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Median NPR
| SHILOH ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL: | 74 |
| State average: | 69 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| SHILOH ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 24 |
| State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 670 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR
| SHILOH ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL: | 75 |
| State average: | 71 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| SHILOH ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 27
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 15%| Here: | 299 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 63%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 74%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.