City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 4.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
2450 PRINCE ST
Ft. Myers, FL 33916
Ft. Myers, FL 33916
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| City Of Cape Coral Charter High School (11.0 miles): | 79 |
| Richard Milburn Academy School (1.8 miles): | 64 |
| Estero High School (15.0 miles): | 57 |
| Buckingham Excep. Student Center School (8.8 miles): | 50 |
| Life Institute For Education Academy School (2.0 miles): | 40 |
| Mariner Middle School (9.6 miles): | 28 |
| Advantage Academy Of Lee County School (0.7 miles): | 11 |
| Sw Fl Addiction Services-The Vince Smith Center School: | 4 |
Sw Fl Addiction Services-The Vince Smith Center School rating compared to average state and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Ft. Myers: | 32 |
| This School: | 4 |
1
Jennifer
May 24, 2012 @ 10:10 am
This is truly a wonderful place! The staff are so good with these kids, they really care. My son has done a complete 360 in 2 months time! Thank you thank you thank you VSC!
2
patti
Jun 29, 2012 @ 8:08 am
I agree with Jenifer. The staff are great .They not only care ,they know what their doing .It's so comforting to know that the person you know in the program is getting help and not just doing time.Thank God their here for the kids.I would hate to think if they weren't.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 36
School number: 682
School type: Senior High
District Name: LEE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 12
School's status regarding neglected and delinquent criteria: Delinquent, Residential
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (239) 338-2383
Principal: Herman Williams
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 14
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 73
Senate District: 37
School Web Address: www.leeschools.net/schools/djj/vince.htm
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 39% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 66% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 39% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER: | 91% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 22% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 47% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 61% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 132 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 57% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 443 |
| State average from 133 schools: | 522 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 132 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: C
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 119999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 137 schools: | 57% |
Minority Rate
Region: 4| SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER: | 93% |
| State average from 137 schools: | 53% |
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 564 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 554 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 163
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 444
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 34% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 446
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 351 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 351 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 101
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 26% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 280
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 23% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 281
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 138 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 131 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 104
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 104
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 543 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 534 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 154
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 429
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 33% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 430
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 68 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (91%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 133 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 132 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 22% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 103
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 21% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 32% |
| State average from 141 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER: | 39% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 139 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 25% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 47% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 65% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 136 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 439 |
| State average from 133 schools: | 540 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 134 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER: | 95% |
| State average from 132 schools: | 53% |
Minority Rate
Region: 4| SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER: | 92% |
| State average from 139 schools: | 52% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 644 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 646 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 29% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 532
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 533
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 414 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 414 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 157
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 25% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 355
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 29% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 356
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 145 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 148 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 38% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 108
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 109
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 609 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 611 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER: | 28% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 503
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 34% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 503
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 68 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 144 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 143 (96%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 18% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 118
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER: | 21% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 116
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 36% |
| State average from 124 schools: | 66% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 124 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER: | 90% |
| State average from 125 schools: | 84% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 17% |
| State average from 122 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 122 schools: | 63% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 122 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER: | 67% |
| State average from 122 schools: | 61% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 122 schools: | 70% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 437 |
| State average from 122 schools: | 535 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES| SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER: | 99% |
| State average from 124 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 126 schools: | 49% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 125 schools: | 52% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 691 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 690 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 31% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 575
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 32% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 575
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 439 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 439 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 122
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 372
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 31% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 371
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 153 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 151 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 32% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 119
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 119
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 631 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 630 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 31% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 527
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 31% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 527
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 99 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 146 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 145 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 16% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 124
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER: | 22% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 122
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 34% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 49% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 33% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 55% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 26% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 37% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 53% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 55% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 63% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
| Here: | 421 |
| State average from 63 schools: | 461 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 97% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 55% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 55% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 800 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 801 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 29% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 30% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 74 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 74 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 505 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 506 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 27% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 180 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 180 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 24% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 27% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 753 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 754 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 30% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 116 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 116 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 18% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 23% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 170 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 171 (96%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 14% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 19% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 36% |
| State average from 62 schools: | 49% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 40% |
| State average from 62 schools: | 55% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 62 schools: | 82% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 62 schools: | 57% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 62 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 62 schools: | 62% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 386 |
| State average from 62 schools: | 371 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 62 schools: | 97% |
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 54% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 53% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 810 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 812 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 95% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 31% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER: | 35% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 84 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (97%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 42% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 500 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 500 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 97% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 29% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 32% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 172 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 174 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 29% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 740 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 742 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 95% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER: | 31% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 97 (98%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 23% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 19% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 185 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 185 (96%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 20% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 23% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 27% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 48% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 56% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER: | 82% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 79% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 54% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 67% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 59% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 325 |
| State average from 53 schools: | 362 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 97% |
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 54% |
Minority Rate
| SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER: | 87% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 51% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1577 |
| State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 273 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER: | 41% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER: | 24% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1646 |
| State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 271 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 47% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 19% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1448 |
| State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%| Here: | 264 |
| State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1587 |
| State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%| Here: | 275 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1482 |
| State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%| Here: | 265 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1662 |
| State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%| SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER: | 275 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1464 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%| Here: | 267 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1555 |
| State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%| SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER: | 269 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1521 |
| State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%| Here: | 275 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1675 |
| State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%| Here: | 278 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 229 |
| State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale Score
| SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER: | 643 |
| State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 37 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 247 |
| State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale Score
| SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER: | 661 |
| State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Median NPR
| SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER: | 48 |
| State average: | 66 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 12 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 1 |
| State average: | 192 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
| SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER: | 5 |
| State average: | 273 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 237 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 6
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1470 |
| State average from 878 schools: | 1661 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%| Here: | 268 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1474 |
| State average: | 1663 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 89| SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER: | 1385 |
| State average: | 1592 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1570 |
| State average from 808 schools: | 1746 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%| Here: | 272 |
| State average: | 305 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1572 |
| State average: | 1743 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 90| Here: | 1482 |
| State average: | 1668 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1712 |
| State average from 819 schools: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%| Here: | 274 |
| State average: | 294 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1717 |
| State average: | 1807 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 96| Here: | 1621 |
| State average: | 1738 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%| Here: | 262 |
| State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1467 |
| State average from 873 schools: | 1641 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%| Here: | 262 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1488 |
| State average: | 1645 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -7| Here: | 1496 |
| State average: | 1620 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER: | 1674 |
| State average from 804 schools: | 1777 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%| Here: | 278 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1683 |
| State average: | 1774 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 158| Here: | 1525 |
| State average: | 1645 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1778 |
| State average from 815 schools: | 1851 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%| Here: | 291 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER: | 1782 |
| State average: | 1845 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 106| Here: | 1676 |
| State average: | 1755 |
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 270
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 47| Here: | 654 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 671 |
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 246
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 45| Here: | 658 |
| State average from 796 schools: | 675 |
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 260
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 47| SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER: | 669 |
| State average from 810 schools: | 685 |
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 269
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 41| Here: | 645 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 669 |
Number Sense (max 10): 4
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 245
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 54| SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER: | 667 |
| State average from 796 schools: | 685 |
Number Sense (max 9): 4
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 260
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 59| Here: | 686 |
| State average from 810 schools: | 698 |
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 264
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 41%| Here: | 263 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 32%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 85%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 72%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.