Williams Middle Magnet School in Tampa, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 82.

5020 N 47TH ST
Tampa, FL 33610

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Terrace Community Middle School (5.8 miles):	92
Williams Middle Magnet School:	82
Walker Middle School (13.4 miles):	74
Trinity Upper School (4.7 miles):	60
Pierce Middle School (6.8 miles):	45
Roland Park K-8 School (7.2 miles):	36
Franklin Middle Magnet School (1.6 miles):	19
Carl Sagan Academy School (0.9 miles):	4

Williams Middle Magnet School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Hillsborough County:	42
Tampa:	41
Williams Middle Magnet School:	82

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (813) 744-8600 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 29
School number: 4741
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: HILLSBOROUGH
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (813) 744-8665
Magnet School.
Principal: Patricia Harrell
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 11
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 59
Senate District: 18

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	88%
State average from 613 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	87%
State average from 612 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	97%
State average from 613 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	79%
State average from 612 schools:	51%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	73%
State average from 613 schools:	64%

Making Math Gains

Here:	80%
State average from 612 schools:	70%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	74%
State average from 613 schools:	62%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	71%
State average from 613 schools:	68%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	649
State average from 613 schools:	545

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 613 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 119999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	44%
State average from 614 schools:	56%

Minority Rate

Here:	71%
State average from 614 schools:	49%

Region: 4

Title I: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 794 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 794 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 239
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 791
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 788

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 791
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 788
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 229 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 229 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 77
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 226
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 225

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 226
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 225
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 220 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 220 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 48
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 220
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 220

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	70%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 220
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 220
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 123 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 123 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 123
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 123
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 164 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 164 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 164
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 164
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 164
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 164
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 347 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 347 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 86
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	79%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 346
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 344

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	75%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 346
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 344
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	86%
State average from 613 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	87%
State average from 613 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	97%
State average from 613 schools:	92%

Meeting High Standards in Science

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	78%
State average from 613 schools:	49%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	69%
State average from 613 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	78%
State average from 613 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	71%
State average from 613 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	68%
State average from 613 schools:	67%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	634
State average from 613 schools:	553

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 613 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	40%
State average from 613 schools:	52%

Minority Rate

Here:	69%
State average from 613 schools:	48%

Region: 4

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 855 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 856 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 288
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 850
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 835

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 851
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 837
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 269 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 270 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 100
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 269
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 265

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 270
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 266
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 221 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 221 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 70
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 217
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 210

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	61%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 217
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 211
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 145 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 145 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 53
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 145
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 143

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 145
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 143
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 160 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 160 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 159
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 157
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 159
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 157
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 342 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 343 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 101
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	69%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 337
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 330

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 338
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 332
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	82%
State average from 603 schools:	69%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	83%
State average from 603 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	99%
State average from 603 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	65%
State average from 602 schools:	46%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	71%
State average from 602 schools:	65%

Making Math Gains

Here:	77%
State average from 602 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	66%
State average from 602 schools:	64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	62%
State average from 602 schools:	69%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	605
State average from 602 schools:	543

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 604 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	36%
State average from 605 schools:	49%

Minority Rate

Here:	67%
State average from 605 schools:	48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 897 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 897 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 274
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 891
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 872

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 892
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 871
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 296 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 296 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 84
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 296
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 290

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 296
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 289
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 227 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 227 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 78
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 224
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 214

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	61%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 225
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 214
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 166 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 166 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 56
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	79%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 164
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 162

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 164
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 162
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 140 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 140 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 139
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 139
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 327 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 327 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 99
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	65%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 322
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 313

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	65%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 323
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 312
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	81%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	84%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	97%
State average from 539 schools:	91%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	70%
State average from 538 schools:	44%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	66%
State average from 539 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	80%
State average from 539 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	61%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	70%
State average from 539 schools:	67%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

Here:	609
State average from 539 schools:	523

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 539 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	36%
State average from 541 schools:	49%

Minority Rate

Here:	65%
State average from 542 schools:	53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 900 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 899 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	95%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 287
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 898
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 895
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 315 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 315 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	97%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 102
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 314
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 313
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 249 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 248 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 93
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	50%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 248
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 247
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 160 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 160 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	98%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 160
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 159
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 109 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 109 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	100%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 109
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	95%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 109
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 328 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 327 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 100
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 327
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	63%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 324
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	79%
State average from 526 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	81%
State average from 526 schools:	63%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	96%
State average from 526 schools:	89%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	67%
State average from 526 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	82%
State average from 526 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	62%
State average from 526 schools:	72%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	467
State average from 526 schools:	425

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 526 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	40%
State average from 525 schools:	50%

Minority Rate

Here:	65%
State average from 526 schools:	52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 855 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 855 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	97%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 274
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	77%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 849
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	78%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 850
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 301 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 301 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	99%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 102

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 298
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 298
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 256 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 256 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 80

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 254
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 255
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 155 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 155 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	96%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 51

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	79%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 154
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	77%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 154
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 89 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 89 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	100%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 32
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 89
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 89
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 343 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 343 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	95%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 106

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	59%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 339
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	59%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 340
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 44

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	52%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 23

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	44%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 68

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	48%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 69
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	76%
State average from 505 schools:	59%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	81%
State average from 505 schools:	60%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	93%
State average from 506 schools:	83%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	62%
State average from 505 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

Here:	76%
State average from 505 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	61%
State average from 505 schools:	66%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	449
State average from 506 schools:	397

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 506 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	42%
State average from 506 schools:	51%

Minority Rate

Here:	63%
State average from 506 schools:	50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	1386
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	314
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	17%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	3%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	36%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	35%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	9%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	80%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	1582
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	320
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	14%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	13%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	33%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	35%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	5%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	73%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	19
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1678
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	315
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	12%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	10%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	38%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	35%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	5%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	78%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	3
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	16
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	11
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1981
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	360
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	6%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	5%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	24%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	34%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 5

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	31%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	89%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	9
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	5
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2051
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	363
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	2%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	10%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	26%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	31%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	30%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	87%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	19
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	8
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	5
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2085
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	352
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	3%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	12%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	30%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	41%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	14%
State average:	3%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	85%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	20
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	8
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	323
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	11%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	36%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	41%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	10%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	4%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	53%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	10
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	8
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	368
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	6%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	16%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	38%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	29%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	11%
State average:	2%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	78%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	11
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	10
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	11
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1538
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	352
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	5%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	9%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	34%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	34%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	19%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	87%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1553
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	322
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	13%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	13%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	46%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	22%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	7%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	75%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1740
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	348
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	9%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	17%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	27%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	33%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	14%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	74%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1934
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	370
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	7%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	9%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	20%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	25%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 5

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	39%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	84%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	7
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1994
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	357
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	5%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	10%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	17%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	35%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	32%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	84%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	7
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2064
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	363
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	2%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	8%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	24%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	25%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	42%
State average:	10%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	91%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	9
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	9
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	10
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	8
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1347
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	308
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1622
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 09%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 07%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1658
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	312
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1908
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	347
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	2003
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	354
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2073
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	349
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	314
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	362
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 10
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 11

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1457
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	334
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1593
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	331
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1746
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	349
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1878
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	357
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1991
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	356
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 34%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2042
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	357
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 40%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 121

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Unscore - Combined: 3
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 280

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	5
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 19%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 13%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 97%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	1346
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	308
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1552
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	315
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1654
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	311
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1937
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	352
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2006
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	355
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2033
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	341
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	323
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	348
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1490
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	341
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1571
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	326
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1723
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	345
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1886
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	359
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1987
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	355
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 32%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2011
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	350
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	141
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	632
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

Here:	60
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	120
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

Here:	650
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

Here:	68
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	14
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	138
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

Here:	669
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

Here:	74
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	298
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

Here:	702
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	86
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	15
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	17
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	309
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

Here:	715
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

Here:	88
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	11
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	266
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	713
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

Here:	84
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	14
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	15
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	11
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 116

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	295
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 59%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 75%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 267

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	349
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 77%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	5
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 13%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 10%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 98%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	1907
State average from 878 schools:	1661

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	347
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1912
State average:	1663

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1850
State average:	1592

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 62

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1933
State average from 808 schools:	1746

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	341
State average:	305

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 97%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1939
State average:	1743

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1872
State average:	1668

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 67

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1966
State average from 819 schools:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	294

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 8
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1980
State average:	1807

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	1935
State average:	1738

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 45

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	346
State average:	290

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1892
State average from 873 schools:	1641

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	361
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 30%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1897
State average:	1645

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1842
State average:	1620

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 55

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1938
State average from 804 schools:	1777

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	343
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 97%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1941
State average:	1774

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1864
State average:	1645

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 77

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	2015
State average from 815 schools:	1851

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	351
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 37%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 8
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	2024
State average:	1845

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

WILLIAMS MIDDLE MAGNET SCHOOL:	1977
State average:	1755

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 47

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 334

Mean Scale Score

Here:	702
State average from 874 schools:	671

Median NPR: 86
Literary (max 18): 16
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 270

Mean Scale Score

Here:	699
State average from 796 schools:	675

Median NPR: 80
Literary (max 18): 16
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 278

Mean Scale Score

Here:	715
State average from 810 schools:	685

Median NPR: 84
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 10): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 14): 11
Strategies (max 10): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 334

Mean Scale Score

Here:	711
State average from 874 schools:	669

Median NPR: 89
Number Sense (max 10): 8
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 271

Mean Scale Score

Here:	719
State average from 796 schools:	685

Median NPR: 87
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 278

Mean Scale Score

Here:	737
State average from 810 schools:	698

Median NPR: 90
Number Sense (max 9): 8
Operations (max 9): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 278

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	340
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 73%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 95%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 91%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AB	BC	MB	NB	NL	NS	NT
NU	ON	PE	QC	SK	YT