Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Ohio
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-17-2021, 05:45 PM
 
Location: USA
509 posts, read 790,354 times
Reputation: 463

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by GraniteStater View Post
The US is certainly not pro-natal due to a lack of longer maternity leave policies or even paternity leave policies that are found in the vast majority of the developed world. People can't afford to take time off work due to leave constraints that many employers have. Throw in the inflated costs of healthcare and still rising, and the closure of MANY rural hospitals and you have a large number of counties across the country with a greater percentage of the population over age 65 than under age 18. This will become the norm in many areas due to the baby boomer population aging into their senior years over the next 8 years or so- by 2030 the entire cohort will be over age 65.
Yeah I guess you have a point, however policy obviously isn't the main driver of birth rates, as we see Europe and Japan with very low birth rates.

It's not a perfect system here, but we get by. If daycare is too expensive then usually the grandparents chip in.

Overall it seems that having kids is more encouraged in US vs Europe and Asia. We have about 2 kids per couple and they have less than 2 and in some cases less than 1. That's very low. The Euro's just want to enjoy life, kid's are too much work. And the Asians aren't having enough sex - not a joke - it's a crisis in Japan, many young people are not dating, not having sex, very alone. Kinda sad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-23-2021, 07:31 AM
 
Location: Clifton, Cincinnati
183 posts, read 198,939 times
Reputation: 365
Quote:
Originally Posted by dustin183 View Post
Yeah I guess you have a point, however policy obviously isn't the main driver of birth rates, as we see Europe and Japan with very low birth rates.

It's not a perfect system here, but we get by. If daycare is too expensive then usually the grandparents chip in.

Overall it seems that having kids is more encouraged in US vs Europe and Asia. We have about 2 kids per couple and they have less than 2 and in some cases less than 1. That's very low. The Euro's just want to enjoy life, kid's are too much work. And the Asians aren't having enough sex - not a joke - it's a crisis in Japan, many young people are not dating, not having sex, very alone. Kinda sad.

It is utterly insane that I pay nearly double for childcare versus my rent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2021, 07:35 AM
 
Location: Cleveland and Columbus OH
11,078 posts, read 12,541,693 times
Reputation: 10431
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nomomo07 View Post
It is utterly insane that I pay nearly double for childcare versus my rent.
I think at the end of the day, a parent staying home is the simplest and probably more cost effective solution.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2021, 07:36 AM
 
Location: Clifton, Cincinnati
183 posts, read 198,939 times
Reputation: 365
Quote:
Originally Posted by bjimmy24 View Post
I think at the end of the day, a parent staying home is the simplest and probably more cost effective solution.



That'd be great if wages had kept pace with inflation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2021, 08:12 AM
 
Location: Cleveland and Columbus OH
11,078 posts, read 12,541,693 times
Reputation: 10431
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nomomo07 View Post
That'd be great if wages had kept pace with inflation.
But as is, for the average person, you are spending basically the same amount as the salary you're making to pay for daycare and related expenses. Not to mention the logistical headache.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2021, 10:26 AM
 
6,601 posts, read 9,023,625 times
Reputation: 4699
Quote:
Originally Posted by bjimmy24 View Post
I think at the end of the day, a parent staying home is the simplest and probably more cost effective solution.
It is definitely the simplest, but the long term career costs to staying home for 5+ years can be very high.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2021, 12:33 PM
 
166 posts, read 136,325 times
Reputation: 402
Quote:
Covid is forcing telework onto the boomer management people who have always been in the office & small towns hopefully see the benefits as people move back to small towns for cheaper costs of living & higher quality of life.
It would be interesting to see the long term impact - how much work from home remains and what that means for say, Ohio cites and towns for that matter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2021, 02:29 PM
 
6,601 posts, read 9,023,625 times
Reputation: 4699
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickms55 View Post
It would be interesting to see the long term impact - how much work from home remains and what that means for say, Ohio cites and towns for that matter.
Statewide, it has to be good right? Lots of Ohioans have moved elsewhere in the country, and I have to think a decent number of them will move back if they can keep their current employment.

On the downside, I think it could hurt a lot of urban revitalization efforts and lead to further sprawl since commutes won't matter as much. I expect to see not only with where people choose to live, and also with where companies choose to locate (presuming they still have some degree of physical operations, even if not a full time 40 hour on-site workforce)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2021, 08:56 PM
 
Location: USA
509 posts, read 790,354 times
Reputation: 463
How is your city doing nowadays? Is it improving or declining? I think Columbus is improving. As are the surrounding counties. How about elsewhere in Ohio?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2021, 06:13 AM
 
Location: Springfield, Ohio
14,757 posts, read 14,744,193 times
Reputation: 15520
Quote:
Originally Posted by dustin183 View Post
How is your city doing nowadays? Is it improving or declining? I think Columbus is improving. As are the surrounding counties. How about elsewhere in Ohio?
Dayton has actually improved over the past few years with a lot of new dining, drinking and entertainment places opening up. It was in a pretty bad place 10 years ago and the outer neighborhoods need a lot of work, but things are improving.
Springfield has been declining for decades but it seems to be improving somewhat with a revitalized downtown area.
I expect the small towns in counties neighboring Columbus like Delaware and London will continue to grow as commuter towns. Not sure about the rest of the state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Ohio
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top