Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Just to be the devils advocate, the wife killed the children, he killed the wife. Instead of calling the police, he disposes of the bodies and then claims they are "missing" and "pleads" for their return. How can he or anyone else possibly retain a calm demeanor having had this happen to his children. Oh, and he was cunning enough to create a massive lie. He's guilty.
He was trying to protect Shan'ann's friends and family who all thought she was great. Her poor parents would be even more devastated if they knew she had killed her own daughters and their granddaughters.
He was trying to protect Shan'ann's friends and family who all thought she was great. Her poor parents would be even more devastated if they knew she had killed her own daughters and their granddaughters.
I didn't think his demeanor calm in the least; not in the video posted. But odd he believed K-9 dogs there to track his wife and kids.
In all the TV interviews of Chris Watts, it shows no scratches on his arms or neck. He had a short arm sleeve shirt on. If someone has a link to show me there were any scratches, I d be convinced.
AGAIN, watch the video. His. Neck.
Quote:
Originally Posted by puginabug
You can see red marks/scratches towards the left side of his neck in this interview video.
The prosecution has not yet giving out the autopsy of the killings, but if the husband did strangled her there would be long nail scratches on his arms, unless he knocked her out first.
Just to be the devils advocate, the wife killed the children, he killed the wife. Instead of calling the police, he disposes of the bodies and then claims they are "missing" and "pleads" for their return. How can he or anyone else possibly retain a calm demeanor having had this happen to his children. Oh, and he was cunning enough to create a massive lie. He's guilty.
If this really happened the wife killed the kids , the husband mad and killed her, he would know the law would convict him of killing them all is why he hid them.
There are a many cases of women killing their husband kids for leaving them, the defense has to prove she did do it.
If this really happened the wife killed the kids , the husband mad and killed her, he would know the law would convict him of killing them all is why he hid them.
There are a many cases of women killing their husband kids for leaving them, the defense has to prove she did do it.
Thanks for the rep note. You don't see any scratches. Um, ok.
Ok, we get it, you believe him. You're about -1% of the population.
The kids were killed in the exact same manner as the wife as part of the same sequence, which points to a single perpetrator. You'd also expect someone who knew the kids were strangled only seconds ago to try CPR and/or call for help, as they may have been able to be revived. He didn't.
The fact that he dumped the children's bodies so unceremoniously severely undercuts any claims he might make about being distraught over their deaths. It's not even like he made graves for them in a secret but respectful place. He tossed them like garbage.
The prosecution has not yet giving out the autopsy of the killings, but if the husband did strangled her there would be long nail scratches on his arms, unless he knocked her out first.
The true crime stories I've seen, the scratches seem to be mainly on the face and chest if the perp strangled them from the front. Arms scratches often indicate the perp was behind the victim and that's all the vic could reach -- arms and hands.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.