Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-23-2008, 11:10 PM
 
Location: New Mexico to Texas
4,552 posts, read 15,038,432 times
Reputation: 2171

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by JMT View Post
Actually I would also put Albuquerque on this list. I've spent some time in ABQ and have always enjoyed it. It's a beautiful city in a cool setting, and I never experienced much traffic there, at least nothing that lasted more than just a few minutes. Certainly nothing as maddening as Atlanta, DC, Houston, L.A., or even SLC.

true, your right, it is nothing compared to most other cities, I dont think I could live anywhere much bigger.Traffic is only bad here when trying to cross the river during rush hour.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-23-2008, 11:14 PM
 
3,631 posts, read 10,244,152 times
Reputation: 2039
Quote:
Originally Posted by City_boi View Post
Do Chicago and New York have a lot of traffic like LA, SF, ATL, or Houston do?
Chicago can be a nightmare.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2008, 11:17 PM
 
Location: Omaha
1,137 posts, read 2,282,893 times
Reputation: 326
Omaha is light on traffic. I think Kansas City is also if I remember right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2008, 11:52 PM
 
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
3,941 posts, read 14,726,219 times
Reputation: 2287
Denver's traffic flows pretty easily because most of the roads stay in good condition and they're wide and straight. If I-25 wasn't the only north-south thoroughfare it may even be better.

Minneapolis traffic wasn't too bad either. The occassional standstill close to downtown but there was a lot of construction.

I've heard that Atlanta and Seattle traffic is the worst in the US.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2008, 11:53 PM
 
Location: outer boroughs, NYC
904 posts, read 2,875,376 times
Reputation: 453
Quote:
Originally Posted by City_boi View Post
Do Chicago and New York have a lot of traffic like LA, SF, ATL, or Houston do?
Oh yeah. The difference between New York, Chicago and LA traffic is barely perceptible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2008, 09:57 AM
 
769 posts, read 2,234,480 times
Reputation: 421
Quote:
Originally Posted by supernerdgirl View Post
Chicago can be a nightmare.
Chicago is a nightmare. I always have a tough time finding parking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2008, 10:04 AM
 
Location: City of Thorns
536 posts, read 2,156,026 times
Reputation: 283
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Adam29 View Post
Omaha is light on traffic. I think Kansas City is also if I remember right.
Some areas can be a pain, but most of the main streets have expanded with more lanes and the Dodge expressway really lightens city traffic, for those driving west. One thing I noticed about Omaha living there most of my life is there is always road construction. It's a good thing in the long run but i've been in many traffic jams.

Portland is actually not bad at all.... my 14 mile trip home takes about 20 minutes at 5:00, and I live near downtown. Again some parts can be a pain, and people in the NW seems to drive slower than people in the midwest.... more laid back I guess?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2008, 10:10 AM
 
Location: Indianapolis
1 posts, read 1,696 times
Reputation: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by City_boi View Post
atlanta?!?! You must be joking.
atlanta, seattle?!?! You must be joking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2008, 12:21 PM
 
Location: hopefully NYC one day :D
411 posts, read 1,166,427 times
Reputation: 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by neonwattagelimit View Post
Oh yeah. The difference between New York, Chicago and LA traffic is barely perceptible.
New York and Chicago are as bad as Los Angeles??!!??!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2008, 01:03 PM
hsw
 
2,144 posts, read 7,168,846 times
Reputation: 1540
Of major economic regions, SF-SiliconValley easily wins as having most efficient traffic flow...

280 fwy from SF-SiliconValley is prob fastest (and most scenic) urban fwy in world....

Many who work in SF's financial district live in PacificHts....an easy 10min drive down the sleepy hills of the little socialist town...

And SF region's near-perfect weather means less weather-related slowdowns in traffic flow than NYC/Chicago...

Those who live in "bridge and tunnel" land, EastBay/Marin, have larger QOL issues than just far worse traffic vs SF Peninsula...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top