City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 58.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Imagine Charter At Weston School (18.3 miles): | 98 |
| Youth Co-Op Charter School (7.3 miles): | 78 |
| E.W.F. Stirrup Elementary School (12.4 miles): | 64 |
| Golden Glades Elementary School: | 58 |
| Olympia Heights Elementary School (14.9 miles): | 52 |
| W. R. Thomas Middle School (15.8 miles): | 42 |
| Flagami Elementary School (12.2 miles): | 32 |
| Horace Mann Middle School (5.5 miles): | 12 |
| Robert Renick Education Center School (2.8 miles): | 0 |
Golden Glades Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Miami-Dade County County: | 32 |
| Opa-locka: | 32 |
| Golden Glades Elementary School: | 58 |
1
Basheba smallwood
Aug 6, 2011 @ 9:09 am
Do the children wear mandatory uniforms and what are the colors
2
Alex
Jan 9, 2013 @ 6:18 pm
The school uniform colors are khaki, yellow, white and green.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 13
School number: 2161
School type: Elementary
District Name: DADE
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 6
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 628-5760
Principal: Theron Clark
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 17
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 103
Senate District: 33
School Web Address: http://gglades.dadeschools.net/
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 95% |
| State average from 68 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 68 schools: | 79% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 68 schools: | 86% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 68 schools: | 55% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 68 schools: | 64% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 68 schools: | 67% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 68 schools: | 59% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 68 schools: | 65% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 657 |
| State average from 68 schools: | 549 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 68 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 119999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 15% |
| State average from 68 schools: | 57% |
Minority Rate
Region: 5| Here: | 32% |
| State average from 68 schools: | 46% |
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 400 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 400 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 125
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 378
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 376
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 284 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 284 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 86
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 269
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 269
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 68 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 95% |
| State average from 68 schools: | 78% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 68 schools: | 90% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 68 schools: | 51% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 68 schools: | 68% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 68 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 68 schools: | 65% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 68 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 676 |
| State average from 68 schools: | 561 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 68 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 12% |
| State average from 68 schools: | 54% |
Minority Rate
Region: 5| Here: | 31% |
| State average from 68 schools: | 46% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 416 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 415 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 128
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 390
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 390
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 295 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 295 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 91
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 283
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 283
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 65 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 65 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 65 schools: | 84% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 65 schools: | 47% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 65 schools: | 64% |
Making Math Gains
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 76% |
| State average from 65 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 83% |
| State average from 65 schools: | 59% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 65 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 666 |
| State average from 65 schools: | 536 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 65 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 9% |
| State average from 65 schools: | 52% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 65 schools: | 46% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 423 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 423 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 147
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 398
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 399
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 302 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 302 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 287
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 287
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 60 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 60 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 86% |
| State average from 60 schools: | 84% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 16% |
| State average from 60 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 60 schools: | 69% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 60 schools: | 65% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 63% |
| State average from 60 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 56% |
| State average from 60 schools: | 65% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
| Here: | 425 |
| State average from 60 schools: | 538 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 60 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 91% |
| State average from 60 schools: | 55% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 60 schools: | 55% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 232 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 232 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 96% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 46% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 223 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 223 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 95% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 204 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 204 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 95% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 14% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 61 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 61 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 61 schools: | 83% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 61 schools: | 64% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 61 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 61 schools: | 64% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 336 |
| State average from 61 schools: | 421 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 61 schools: | 100% |
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 61 schools: | 55% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 61 schools: | 54% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 216 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 216 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 208 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 208 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 196 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 196 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 66% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 85% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 67% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 51% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 62% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 362 |
| State average from 59 schools: | 418 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 100% |
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 95% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 56% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 54% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1578 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 346 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 47% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 91% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 20 |
| State average: | 17 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1776 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 353 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 89% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 22 |
| State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1865 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 348 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 4% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 51% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 94% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 3 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 18 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 10 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1629 |
| State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 297 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 55% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1753 |
| State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 307 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 58% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1827 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 298 |
| State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 41% |
| State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 15 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 355 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 3% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 52% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 4% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 78% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 9 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 295 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 34% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 2% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1604 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 366 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 6% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 41% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 93% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1702 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 356 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 91% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1815 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 364 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 43% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 20% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 86% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1616 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 297 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 40% |
| State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1735 |
| State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 293 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 29% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 3% |
| State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 46% |
| State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1849 |
| State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 309 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 10% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 52% |
| State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1563 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%| Here: | 343 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1766 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 02%| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 351 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 05%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1808 |
| State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%| Here: | 338 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1650 |
| State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%| Here: | 300 |
| State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1744 |
| State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| Here: | 305 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1833 |
| State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%| Here: | 299 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%| Here: | 342 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%| Here: | 293 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1632 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%| Here: | 372 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 35%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1737 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 364 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1797 |
| State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 360 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1639 |
| State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%| Here: | 302 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1737 |
| State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 293 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1859 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| Here: | 311 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 134
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 12%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 99%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 451
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1597 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%| Here: | 349 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1752 |
| State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 349 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 21
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1805 |
| State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%| Here: | 338 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1669 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| Here: | 304 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1733 |
| State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| Here: | 303 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1833 |
| State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%| Here: | 299 |
| State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%| Here: | 346 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%| Here: | 287 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1625 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%| Here: | 370 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1722 |
| State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%| Here: | 361 |
| State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1821 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%| Here: | 365 |
| State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1603 |
| State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%| Here: | 294 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1732 |
| State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%| Here: | 292 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1853 |
| State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| Here: | 310 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 127 |
| State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 652 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 76 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 149 |
| State average: | 97 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 674 |
| State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 84 |
| State average: | 69 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 10 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 17 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 8 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 146 |
| State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale Score
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 689 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 87 |
| State average: | 71 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 434 |
| State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 662 |
| State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 55 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 507 |
| State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 672 |
| State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 59 |
| State average: | 66 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 12 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 495 |
| State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale Score
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 679 |
| State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 57 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 12 |
Informational (max 18)
| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 12 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 148
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 6%| Here: | 344 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 84%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 87%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 490
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 27%| Here: | 277 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 32%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 46%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 89%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1124 |
| State average: | 1342 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 271 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1407 |
| State average from 1875 schools: | 1542 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%| Here: | 290 |
| State average: | 313 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 84%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1421 |
| State average: | 1546 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 121| Here: | 1300 |
| State average: | 1397 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1488 |
| State average from 1873 schools: | 1629 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%| Here: | 281 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1499 |
| State average: | 1632 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 36| Here: | 1463 |
| State average: | 1532 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1529 |
| State average from 878 schools: | 1661 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 278 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1544 |
| State average: | 1663 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 73| Here: | 1471 |
| State average: | 1592 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%| Here: | 269 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1253 |
| State average: | 1413 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%| Here: | 290 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1501 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 1525 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 310 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 84%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1504 |
| State average: | 1528 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 124| Here: | 1381 |
| State average: | 1414 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1506 |
| State average from 1872 schools: | 1647 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%| Here: | 299 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1526 |
| State average: | 1649 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 53| Here: | 1473 |
| State average: | 1519 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1575 |
| State average from 873 schools: | 1641 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%| Here: | 287 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1580 |
| State average: | 1645 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 105| Here: | 1474 |
| State average: | 1620 |
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 69
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 42| Here: | 611 |
| State average from 1891 schools: | 633 |
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 51
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 50| Here: | 630 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 642 |
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 55
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 54| Here: | 647 |
| State average from 1870 schools: | 667 |
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 55
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 51| Here: | 658 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 671 |
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 69
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 50| Here: | 610 |
| State average from 1891 schools: | 632 |
Number Sense (max 14): 9
Operations (max 11): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 51
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 64| Here: | 635 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 652 |
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 55
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 44| Here: | 631 |
| State average from 1870 schools: | 663 |
Number Sense (max 12): 7
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 55
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 52| Here: | 656 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 669 |
Number Sense (max 10): 5
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 50
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 22%| GOLDEN GLADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 286 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 50%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 76%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 56%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.